Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: building hangs in testsuite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
Summary: building hangs in testsuite
Product: Fedora
Hi folks,
todays yum update spit out some errors and warnings not too hard to fix:
Warning in file
/usr/share/applications/gnome-nautilus-folder-handler.desktop: usage
of MIME type x-directory/gnome-default-handler is discouraged
(x-directory is an old media type that should be replaced with a
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 00:57 -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 23:26 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
How about this?
import os
p = set()
for pkg in os.popen('repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps python(abi) =
2.6'):
pkg =
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:55:15AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
BTW since a python mass-rebuild is looming anyway, we might want to
consider pulling in Aurélien Bompard's python-egg dependency extractors
while at it: http://rpm.org/ticket/15
That sounds good. One note: we might want to
#3780: Grant CVS write access for all perl packages to ppisar
-+--
Reporter: ppisar | Owner: toshio
Type: task| Status: closed
Milestone: | Component: cvs
Resolution: fixed |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2010-06-25 04:32:37
EDT ---
Could be I am not patient enough. The
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 06/25/2010 01:24 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On 06/20/2010 05:08 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The spec file for each per-module package I just created is generated
through a little and nasty script which converts spec files generated by
setuptools to ones complying with Fedora
I have two easy reviews to trade:
xnoise, a tracklist-centric media player:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60
and
xnoise-plugins-core, some plugins that ship with it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778
I've been running development versions for a while, so now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607896
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Uninitialized warnings on $magnitude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607982
Summary: Uninitialized warnings on $magnitude
Product:
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:56:39AM +0200, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
hello, i try create 2 package: ldc and tango.
I have a big question where i put *.d file ?
for C/C++ it's in /usr/include but D they are nothing
attached my ancient gcc + D(v1.x) rpm specfile.
Have not done this lately and
Compose started at Fri Jun 25 08:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-ShareLite/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18185/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
Log Message:
Update EL-5 and EL-6 branch to 0.13
Index: perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-ShareLite/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18185/EL-5
Modified Files:
perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec sources
Log Message:
Update EL-5 and EL-6 branch to 0.13
Index: perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert-More - request for EL-6 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608024
Summary: perl-Carp-Assert-More - request for EL-6 branch
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
So... AFAIK, libtool does solve this which is why I'm wondering why you're
seeing this. Is the package that's giving you problems checked into the
rawhide cvs right now?
What changed is simply that I'm using my script
- Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:38:27PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 June 2010 09:50, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
“/sbin/upsdrvctl is used as the near final step in
/etc/init.d/halt to
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com said:
Ideally your UPS is smart enough to sense when the load drops to 0,
and do whatever it needs to do w/o system intervention of any sort. If
your UPS can't do that, maybe it is time to look for alternatives :)
That's nice if you only have a
Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
to my email, but I noticed:
1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
This is really strange because the latest libguestfs package built in
Rawhide is 1.3.21, see:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8391
Richard Jones wrote, at 06/25/2010 10:40 PM +9:00:
Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
to my email, but I noticed:
1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
This is really strange because the latest libguestfs package built in
Rawhide is 1.3.21, see:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:52:44PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard Jones wrote, at 06/25/2010 10:40 PM +9:00:
Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access
to my email, but I noticed:
1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc]
This is really strange because
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
If a proven packager can just do a bump and rebuild it ought
to fix the issue.
OK I see that failed with:
guestfsd: error: cannot find required program mke2fs
[...]
mkfs.ext2: No such file or directory
guestfsd: error: ext2:
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC a compiler for the D programming language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
bad link for tango = https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
Le vendredi 25 juin 2010 à 17:15 +0200, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
None of the above. Why libtool isn't handling this rpath (and the binaries
created during the build process) correctly when it does in other software.
No, libtool is adding an rpath fine; see below:
So if you have
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:34:34AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
None of the above. Why libtool isn't handling this rpath (and the binaries
created during the build process) correctly when it does in other software.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that you have to use those sed lines shows that there's something
wrong somewhere as we normally don't need them to produce rpath-free
binaries if we're using Fedora or Red Hat libtool. Since you have the
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
As far as using that, note the glib2 tarballs are actually typically
created on an Ubuntu system. So...
What makes you think so ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-06-25 14:22:18 EDT
---
Hello!
Could you, please, clarify whether
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589261
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-06-25 14:23:41 EDT
---
Hello!
Could you, please, clarify whether
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Burstein dmitryburst...@netscape.net 2010-06-25
14:51:29 EDT ---
Yep.. unfortunately it still exists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589261
--- Comment #2 from lejeczek pawel.elj...@jatymy.org 2010-06-25 15:28:20 EDT
---
I think it does,
but there is that thing in
Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?
Just a thought.
-AdamM (From Android)
On Jun 25, 2010 6:27 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13912
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14350/F-12
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Number-Compare/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14350/F-13
Modified Files:
perl-Number-Compare.spec
Added Files:
Number-Compare-0.01-uninitialized.patch
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 26 2010 Ralf Corsépius
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:27 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update? It was submitted
at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was
submitted for stable two hours later. Between
On 06/26/2010 07:33 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?
Would you mind to explain how could have happened:
#
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608024
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: xavierb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IPC-ShareLite/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22038
Modified Files:
perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
Log Message:
update to 0.17
Index: perl-IPC-ShareLite.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormFu:
afe68a74e7cf52a61537d9dce7a6c9b3 HTML-FormFu-0.07002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601232
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-06-25 14:12:39 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601232
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601232
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601232
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-06-25 14:20:36 EDT ---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-ShareLite:
54c7aa08dc065b6c946c48491d33450d IPC-ShareLite-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563937
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563935
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-25
18:40:18 EDT ---
perl-IPC-ShareLite-0.13-4.el5
52 matches
Mail list logo
