On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:21:22 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
The added complication is that the criterion is when the package was last
touched before being orphaned (and some people say it should be
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Could a flag be added to only output the package names, so that I can
pipe the output directly to yum? Or even better, have that flag
automatically cause the bodhi client to invoke yum with
--enable-repo=updates-testing
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:35:20 +0200, Till wrote:
1) To make such run-time deps BuildRequires would be helpful (because it
doesn't make much sense to build something for a target that is missing
something). Several broken deps in old dist branches have been because
of a discrepancy between
Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
One can quickly see that several (if not many) of them are due
to orphans/retired packages in Fedora 12. And due to violated upgrade
paths (e.g. compat-db):
Summary of broken
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:35:20 +0200, Till wrote:
1) To make such run-time deps BuildRequires would be helpful (because it
doesn't make much sense to build something for a target that is missing
something). Several
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS
http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/RPMS
Working F13 packages are available if anyone wants to try or make comments
on them. (Might not meet package guidelines yet)
Create review requests, Cc: me on
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 12:33:56 +0200, Michel wrote:
This is not semantically part of building, though. I see two possible
solutions:
1. Koji should check the explicitly-listed Requirements and refuse to
build a package if these
are not available
As I wrote in the previous msg, it would
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
And there would be drawbacks, too, for a hardcoded Req = BR rule.
It would make circular deps impossible: Pkg A requires Pkg A-extras,
and Pkg A-extras BR Pkg A. It would make bootstrapping a dist more
complicated.
For this
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Could a flag be added to only output the package names, so that I can
pipe
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
One can quickly see that several (if not many) of them are due
to orphans/retired packages in Fedora 12. And due
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:22:16 +0200, Till wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
And there would be drawbacks, too, for a hardcoded Req = BR rule.
It would make circular deps impossible: Pkg A requires Pkg A-extras,
and Pkg A-extras BR Pkg A. It would
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:32:14 +0200, Till wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
One can quickly see that several (if not many) of them are
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:06:08PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:32:14 +0200, Till wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
also enabling Fedora 12 + updates +
Compose started at Sun Jul 4 08:15:10 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686
ok :)
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS
http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/RPMS
Working F13 packages are available if anyone wants to try
you're in now Michel
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
ok :)
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:40:20 +0200, Till wrote:
It's fairly easy to verify other broken deps, too:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/compat-db-4.7.25-3.fc13
For me it is not that easy, because the information is confusion (or not
clearly arranged) or not directly accessible, e.g. to
I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
%check. The odd thing is, up to F-13 the same checks fail, but for
some reason the failure does not generate an error number that is
propagated back to rpm,
2010/7/4 Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com:
I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
%check. The odd thing is, up to F-13 the same checks fail, but for
some reason the failure
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/4 Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com:
I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
%check. The odd thing
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:40:20 +0200, Till wrote:
It's fairly easy to verify other broken deps, too:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/compat-db-4.7.25-3.fc13
For me it is not that easy, because the information is
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
rebuilt.
...
seed
Does not build right now due to the reorganization of files in
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PartialDump:
54c96daed7cab9f36ac371a209d1c445 Devel-PartialDump-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-PartialDump/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17364/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Devel-PartialDump.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-PartialDump/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17364/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Devel-PartialDump.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-PartialDump/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17364/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Devel-PartialDump.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE
Sorry for my late joining.
A Zope specific mailing list may not be in urgent need by now. We can
just use this mailing list, which is for Python packaging in general.
The traffic of this mailing list is low and some of our decisions for
Zope packagine may affect wider Python packaging
30 matches
Mail list logo
