On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
Days until Release Candidate Compose = 8
Here's the run down on the current open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker
bugs
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 07:03 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
And while Thunderbird 3 was included due to the slow development pace of
the upstream (we used to have a very old Tb 2), Firefox 4 comes with at
least a killer feature, WebM (IIRC, another killer feature is the new js
engine)
2010/7/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/7/29 Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au:
I'm not going to pretend that I'm not pleased about the delay. I plan
to keep using G2 for as long as I possible can, long after the Gnome 3
release.
Is it possible to disable gnome-shell in the
So will Chromium get into the third-party repos like RPM Fusion? RPM Fusion
has ffmpeg packages.
The problem is that RPM Fusion needs much more time and more resources to
build such a big package.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:47
Le 28/07/2010 19:11, Kai Engert a écrit :
Remi does:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/07/28/Firefox-4.0-Beta-2-en
F12 + F13, i386 + x86_64 build available.
+
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/29/2010 12:01 PM, Liang Suilong wrote:
So will Chromium get into the third-party repos like RPM Fusion? RPM
Fusion has ffmpeg packages.
The problem is that RPM Fusion needs much more time and more resources
to build such a big package.
Since ffmpeg can be runtime detected by
Le 28/07/2010 19:11, Kai Engert a écrit :
Remi does:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/07/28/Firefox-4.0-Beta-2-en
F12 + F13, i386 + x86_64 build available.
+
P.S. spec and patches
http://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/tree/master/firefox/
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a distribution that's lost their
It looks that copr will come soon. I have a question about it.
Could we add some dependencies from other copr repo? Fedora official repo
sometimes could not offer the latest one but some packages need them.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:14 AM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Wed,
On 07/28/2010 11:13 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 17:00:01 -0500,
Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.comwrote:
That is assuming that the other repo uses the same name as Fedora's.
Fedora could
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:33:46 -0700,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images from
nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615443
--This bug was reported on July 16,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:08:13 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images
from nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) ::
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 02:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:08 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
Days until Release Candidate
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:17 AM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Yesterday, July 27, 2010, we reached Feature Freeze for Fedora 14
As previously noted, at Feature Freeze it is expected that all features
are *significantly* feature complete and ready for testing:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish
On 07/28/2010 06:11 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Fedora just can't
include ffmpeg for obvious reasons,
How many more years are we talking about for ffmpeg?
Speaking of which, when can we include a mp3 decoder library in
Fedora? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a
On 07/29/2010 02:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Over 10K repos have been converted, but I do have to run a script over
those repos and make sure the conversion actually succeeded. We've
also gotten dist-f14, dist-f13, dist-f12, and el6 in a state that we can
build with, however we do have to do
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
This may be a dumb question (I'm full of dumb questions sometimes),
Even dumber question. Are bugzilla fedora-cvs flags getting renamed?
And do we need to make New Package Git Requests now?
--
Iain.
--
devel
Hello my Fedora friends!
Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be
compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are
different types of talking points for different types of people:
general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins. For the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:10 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/29/2010 02:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Over 10K repos have been converted, but I do have to run a script over
those repos and make sure the conversion actually succeeded. We've
also gotten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:18 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
This may be a dumb question (I'm full of dumb questions sometimes),
Even dumber question. Are bugzilla fedora-cvs flags
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Option C:
fedpkg clone -B libfoo
cd libfoo/f13/
This doesn't seem to work... perhaps because of the transition?
http://fpaste.org/FV5g/
If I can get this working, I'd be willing to help write wiki pages. :)
~spot
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:51 AM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Option C:
fedpkg clone -B libfoo
cd libfoo/f13/
This doesn't seem to work... perhaps because of the transition?
http://fpaste.org/FV5g/
If I
Am Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:31:39 +0200
schrieb Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org:
Hi list,
with a recent rpmlint, there will be a new warning
'private-shared-object-provides'. This will always trigger a *.so file
inside of %{python_sitearch} as a wrong dependency:
A shared object soname
Kevin Fenzi said the following on 07/28/2010 10:08 PM Pacific Time:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com wrote:
597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: SELinux is
preventing firefox from making its memory writable and executable.
crashes rawhide firefox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
I see active build targets in koji for dist-olpc{2,3,4},
olpc2-{ship2,trail3,update1}. Are you saying we could remove all of
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
I see active build targets in koji for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 02:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
But for the typical tasks here we go:
I want to build a new libfoo for rawhide:
fedpkg clone libfoo
cd libfoo
edit files
fedpkg commit
input commit message
fedpkg push (this step could
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
fedpkg: error: invalid choice: 'push' (choose from 'clog', 'help',
'mockbuild', 'sources', 'diff', 'gimmespec', 'build', 'import',
'verrel', 'local', 'prep', 'tag-request', 'clean', 'build_common',
I'd love to know
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
fedpkg: error: invalid choice: 'push' (choose from 'clog', 'help',
'mockbuild', 'sources', 'diff', 'gimmespec', 'build', 'import',
'verrel', 'local',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above to the latest builds. We're
working on getting them pushed out in updates for people.
- --
Jesse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 04:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above to the latest builds. We're
working on getting them
Hello all,
I am orphaning Glade3, I don't use it at all anymore since I've
transitioned to Qt4 for the most part. There are quite a few bugs open
but a large portion of them are duplicates from abrt that I just never
got around to triaging (hence the orphaning).
There are three co-maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.07.2010 22:15, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
Just updated to the latest build. 'fedpkg diff' fails with: File
/usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module args.command(args) File
/usr/bin/fedpkg, line 440, in diff mymodule =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 04:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 07/29/2010 04:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/29/2010 12:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This didn't work for me. 'fedpkg push' just gives me:
You need a newer fedpkg. I linked above to the
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Never mind, turns out this was me trying to use fedpkg 0.5.0 against a
checkout made for 0.4.2 (against the test environment)
Note that fedpkg 0.5.1 is out now.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to individual
fedora-13-spot / fedora-13-mmcgrath
Ankur Sinha reported a SELinux message about an unsafe memory access in
Wine.
On 07/28/2010 07:46 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Instead it tells you using this program can be a risk (dangerous?)
But if you really need this program:
su
/usr/sbin/setsebool -P mmap_low_allowed 1
Does that enable
On Wed 28 July 2010 02:38:24 Ankur Sinha wrote:
hi,
I've recently come across an selinux issue.
Is this another selinux issue with the package?
The detailed description says exactly why the notice came up, dude. It's not
an SElinux issue, it's a
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: SELinux is preventing
firefox from making its memory writable and executable. crashes rawhide
firefox start ::
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:04 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 03:21:51PM +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
It looks that copr will come soon. I have a question about it.
Could we add some dependencies from other copr repo? Fedora official repo
sometimes could not offer the latest one but some packages need them.
yes. The idea is
I've been asked by FESCo to post this public service announcement :)
We'd just like to remind those who test Fedora, in whatever
way...running a stable release with updates-testing, running Rawhide,
being a proven tester (especially)...that it's best if you test with
SELinux enabled and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 12:05 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
There will be an outage starting at 2010-07-28 07:15 UTC, which will
last approximately 48 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
for our package specs, patches, and source files. This has been a long
time coming and a massive effort. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost
rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting
confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552616
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552616
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-29
21:04:23 EDT ---
perl-Glib-1.223-1.el5.1 has been
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Throwable:
f048e133a92eab91a1975001d2a55a38 Throwable-0.102080.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-String-Formatter:
c53463f6c226faf3f61e3a25ede18849 String-Formatter-0.102080.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
52 matches
Mail list logo
