I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
(somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
join up.
Please everyone that is interested add yourself to
Greetings,
Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
Several problems have been reported when preupgrading to F-14 Alpha,
this day we will focus on preupgrade[1] to summarize the issues. The
tests were designed to cover general circumstances,
2010/8/31 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Heads up to
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/31 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:52 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
(master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free
to CC me for other fallout.
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64 boxes I normally use, and I
keep borrowing prebuilt compilers off others (usually Al Viro - thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2010 06:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: new version available and shipped version has disappeared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629229
Summary: new version available and shipped version
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:21:51AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2010 06:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep
On 09/01/2010 12:41 PM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64 boxes I normally use, and I
keep borrowing
On 09/01/2010 12:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:41 PM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64
Hi,
- A cross compiler alone is not worth it, you need a whole zoo of
further cross-target packages to make it usable.
Without massive changes to the infrastructure, this would add a
significant amount of packages to the distro.
Depends on what you wanna do with it. For linux kernel
On 09/01/2010 01:53 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:41 PM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200 2010:
I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
In case you missed Alexander's mail the wiki is created [1]
I am planning first IRC meeting.
Compose started at Wed Sep 1 08:15:32 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:20:23 -0400,
Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Please do not ignore that the browser is there for the user to use,
not for Fedora to stream information in spite of the user's
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:20 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
snip
entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
snip
gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.i686 requires
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:20 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
snip
entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64
On 09/01/2010 01:06 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/01/2010 01:53 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/01/2010 12:41 PM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and
binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the
commit 86f3b34d4612ca3bed1841cba35229909525c283
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 1 09:02:40 2010 -0400
update to 0.19
.gitignore |1 +
perl-OLE-Storage_Lite.spec |9 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:41:34 +0100,
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64 boxes I
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org writes:
The problematic part is GCC, with its horrid incestuous dependencies --
in particular, the way you have to build everything twice because it
insists on building libgcc in the *same* pass as the one it uses to
build gcc itself, and it wants to link
On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 6:41:34 AM, David Howells wrote:
Would it be worth our while putting into Fedora basic gcc and binutils rpms
for cross compilers for all the Linux arches? I keep finding the need to
compile kernels for arches other than the x86_64 boxes I normally use, and I
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:20 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:47 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:36 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
Perhaps local and so forth could be given a --dist=foo switch, and these
sorts of errors could say can't figure out
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
Or make it a branch config (eg. git config branch.$branch.dist f14).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG
On 08/28/2010 05:37 PM, Till Maas wrote:
With the FPCA, the board could relicense everything. But RedHat appoints
the board chair, who has veto power. If this is right, then this could
be changed by making the chair seat another normal seat, that is voted
for by the community and make the
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I personally don't like fedpkg doing magic based on the name of the VCS
branch I am on and would use a branch file. I don't see what the big
deal is about having the branches identical; I think seeing the
difference in the dist value could
b) To equippe the rpm/yum/mock etc. infrastructure with a mechanism to
pull-in foreign binaries into a sys-root (E.g. to install Fedora
*.ppc.rpm rpms into /usr/ppc-redhat/sys-root). So far, such mechanism
doesn't exist.
No need for that eithr. They can figure out
rpm2cpio package | cpio
On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 9:35:16 AM, I wrote:
On July 7th, 2009, Mark Salter made a post crossbuilding rpms with
koji on the fedora-buildsys-list.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-buildsys-l...@redhat.com/msg02148.html
And for folks who prefer the official archive,
On 09/01/2010 03:37 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
b) To equippe the rpm/yum/mock etc. infrastructure with a mechanism to
pull-in foreign binaries into a sys-root (E.g. to install Fedora
*.ppc.rpm rpms into /usr/ppc-redhat/sys-root). So far, such mechanism
doesn't exist.
No need for that eithr.
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:58 -0700, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a package (ghemical) which requires a courier 12 font for use in
its xwindow gui. I clearly need some dependency that will drag in
xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
or
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:03:17PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Where, keep in mind, slow is defined as twice a year, right?
Yes.
I think this is a remarkable definition of slow. Especially if we can
provide options for people who want a faster path to do so.
I don't think that's fair at
On 09/01/2010 02:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:06:37PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- Fedora's rpm and some components the build-infrastructure have serious
issues related to cross-building.
- A cross compiler alone is not worth it, you need a whole zoo of
further
On 09/01/2010 03:02 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:46 AM, David Woodhousedw...@infradead.org wrote:
There's a reason the 'crosstool' and similar scripts are so bloody sick.
Speaking of which, it looks like there's a stalled review of crosstool-ng in
the works [1].
On 09/01/10 16:46, Andrew Haley wrote:
rpm2cpio package | cpio -i -
Isn't that easy, you'll have to do a bunch of fixups after doing so to
have things actually work.
Usually not. Nine times out of ten, (probably 99 out of 100) all you
need for cross-devel is the headers and the libraries,
On 09/01/2010 04:37 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
b) To equippe the rpm/yum/mock etc. infrastructure with a mechanism to
pull-in foreign binaries into a sys-root (E.g. to install Fedora
*.ppc.rpm rpms into /usr/ppc-redhat/sys-root). So far, such mechanism
doesn't exist.
No need for that eithr.
commit 175b442591c86daed9cb0f605335e3bd57495363
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:17 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Trigger-0.13-2.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Trigger.spec | 21 -
commit 26e92c452be1d789b53a477f2187cf43769214c3
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:37 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Data-Inheritable-0.08-3.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest
RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Data-Inheritable.spec |
commit 66adfd475d87cbd96beb23723a2530c30cce3c24
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:55 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Accessor-0.31-6.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Accessor.spec |6 +-
2 files
commit 82c630adf58162b622eb8ac6193c6820e74e4110
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:06:53 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.38-4.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore|1 +
perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec |8
On 09/01/2010 04:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 09/01/10 16:46, Andrew Haley wrote:
rpm2cpio package | cpio -i -
Isn't that easy, you'll have to do a bunch of fixups after doing so to
have things actually work.
Usually not. Nine times out of ten, (probably 99 out of 100) all you
need for
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
Or make it a branch config (eg. git config branch.$branch.dist f14).
This, please. Using magical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/1/10 9:01 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
Or make
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:06 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 9/1/10 9:01 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that
For cross gcc I guess the important question is, do we want
gcc-4*.src.rpm to build all the cross compilers (and, is C enough, or
do we need C++ too?), or do we have one cross-gcc-4*.src.rpm that
semi-loosely tracks gcc-4*.src.rpm and builds all the cross compilers
(BuildRequires all the
On 09/01/2010 06:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200
2010:
I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
In case you missed Alexander's mail the wiki
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Florian has already been working that out. He's got a pure-python script
that grabs up the icons and we'll work on implementing them at the pkgdb
layer.
Hmm, you're saying the client code would talk to pkgdb?
--
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 16:47 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Florian has already been working that out. He's got a pure-python script
that grabs up the icons and we'll work on implementing them at the pkgdb
layer.
On Thursday, August 19, 2010 05:46 pm, seth vidal wrote
I mentioned this on:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/fedora-app-market-proof-of-concept/
last night but I thought I'd bring it up here:
Yesterday someone was talking about installing apps in fedora and how it
was hard to
The lightweight tag 'perl-Term-Shell-0.02-2.fc15' was created pointing to:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Term-Shell-0.02-2.fc14' was created pointing to:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Term-Shell-0.02-2.fc13' was created pointing to:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Term-Shell-0.02-2.el6' was created pointing to:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010/9/2 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
[..]
Well, the version of Mozilla Firefox in Fedora 14 should support WebM,
so try this: http://www.youtube.com/html5
Unfortunately does not work here
http://i54.tinypic.com/11ayg6d.png
Any ideas why Adobe Flash does not work on F14? Once
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:01 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net writes:
I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a branch
file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
Or make it a branch config (eg.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 02:28 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/9/2 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
[..]
Well, the version of Mozilla Firefox in Fedora 14 should support WebM,
so try this: http://www.youtube.com/html5
Unfortunately does not work here
I'm trying to build perl-Bio-SamTools for EPEL5. As part of this, I
need an EPEL build of perl-bioperl and its associated dependencies.
One problem I've run into is that the Fedora .spec for perl-SOAP-Lite
uses the filtering macros available in F11 to remove some unwanted
Requires entries,
commit 8bf64cd1c2544471add46b9c24e71b64358a8e70
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 11:41:42 2010 +0100
Update to match RHEL SRPM
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec | 22 +++---
2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: new version available and shipped version has disappeared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629228
Summary: new version available and shipped version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624397
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629228
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-01
09:08:23 EDT ---
perl-OLE-Storage_Lite-0.19-1.el5
commit dea70009ba77dc91404f8bdd9b7f60bb73018fc5
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:05:33 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-HTML-Format-2.04-11.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore|1 +
perl-HTML-Format.spec | 14 ++
2 files
commit db053cf7a34374028e0b97717885c26b2e91d0bd
Author: Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:06:16 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Font-AFM-1.20-3.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Font-AFM.spec | 14 ++
2 files changed, 7
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Term-Shell:
273042f90af469c674f5b44ed011326b Term-Shell-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 85529dace33c1fc4aa6299d39e94b1e20c743d60
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Wed Sep 1 22:37:58 2010 +0200
Import, rhbz#624699
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Term-Shell.spec | 60 ++
sources |1 +
Summary of changes:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
85529da... Import, rhbz#624699 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629228
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
24668f4... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
a862f95... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
186f890... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
35ebb1a... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
4f5048f... Initialize
commit c9c98d7e7550236db8816f24ad7855f1c0d4f40b
Merge: 1e62acd 6ebe798 f0c380b 1e62acd 6ebe798
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Sep 2 04:57:16 2010 +0200
initial pseudo-merge for dist-git setup
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Summary of changes:
dafd4ba... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Linux-Inotify2 (*)
24668f4... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
c916af5... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
186f890... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
4f5048f...
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-Stem:
a236b5d85ac49f84aad447c1383ad2de Lingua-Stem-0.84.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e34f4529da1f1f539f37b2f3eeca973538ccf7f2
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Sep 2 05:00:52 2010 +0200
initial import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem.spec | 59 +
sources |1 +
3 files
commit 7ed8600059c687ec0e3d3c79a59f504ac8163ce0
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Sep 2 05:57:20 2010 +0200
skip t/generated_app
because RHEL's Test::More doesn't support subtest
perl-Catalyst-Devel.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2
77 matches
Mail list logo
