On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:50 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:48 -0430, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
> > Why is this happening?
> >
> > rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
> > dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
> > Operation failed with the error
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:48 -0430, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
> Why is this happening?
>
> rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
> dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
> Operation failed with the error:
> koji.TagError: build rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 not
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
> bunch of proposed new wiki p
Why is this happening?
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
Operation failed with the error:
koji.TagError: build rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 not in tag
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending
Is it something i can fix? (
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
> > vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
> > rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time t
inclua sua empresa na internet e aumente os lucros de seu negócio,
[#E-mail]12:16:16!
Oferecemos:
- criação de sites e Lojas Virtuais
- Otimização de Sites (SEO)
- Links Patrocinados
- E-mail Marketing
- criação de logomarcas
- criação de multimÃdia
Ligue e peça um orçamento se
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:11 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> In principle, the system for extracting %changelog from git might work,
> with two provisos:
>
> - people understand that git changelogs have slightly different purpose
> than RPM changelogs: git records 'what' changed, while RPM shou
On 09/24/2010 01:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The rpm changelog should be more like NEWS than a changelog; and usually
> a summary of NEWS, at that. (imho, no packaging guidelines currently
> mandate this, etc.)
I could swear I had written "don't copy the upstream changelog into the
rpm change
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
> vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
> rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time to time that deserve a
> commit in git but don't deserve a mention in th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630091
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449474&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:43:47PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > Is it really necessary to in
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 17:43:47 +0100,
Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> For the fact that its gone from version X to version Y yes. For the
> actual application changed between version X and version Y they can
> see the ChangeLog that's in the %doc or alternatively check the
> release notes for the n
On 09/24/2010 12:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire package c
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
>> > rpm changelog? What is wron
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> > rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> > changelog or a URL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570321
Mark Chappell changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Compose started at Fri Sep 24 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
evolution-cou
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:57:41 +0200, Milan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm so sorry for a late notice, but there was a soname bump of
> libedataserverui library from evolution-data-server package in time for
> 2.31.91 update, but I didn't notice this change, and because this update
> didn't get it to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557485
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
commit df4968db479bcdb91a4321e5e658ce4756b0dae0
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Sep 24 14:41:36 2010 +0100
Filter LWP::Protocol and other bogus provides (#557485)
- Filter bogus provide of perl(LWP::Protocol) (#557485)
- Filter additional bogus provides:
- perl(My::PingPon
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> changelog or a URL to a changelog that people can go and reference. I
> remember this being dis
Hi all,
I'm so sorry for a late notice, but there was a soname bump of
libedataserverui library from evolution-data-server package in time for
2.31.91 update, but I didn't notice this change, and because this update
didn't get it to the testing repo, then I realized just now, when I
finishe
Compose started at Fri Sep 24 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
claws-ma
Hi,
On 09/22/2010 07:37 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
>> Eric Smith wrote:
>>
>>> A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
>>> added a patch to resolve it and submitted a
Michał Piotrowski, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:32:49 +0200:
> PostgreSQL 9 was released
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235
>
> Are there any chances to get this for F14? The new version supports
> basic replication scenarios, so I would not have to use PgPool :)
I think this is an ideal project
24.09.2010 13:27, Mamoru Tasaka пишет:
> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/24/2010 06:11 PM +9:00:
>> I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora 12
>> and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
>>
>> /usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/24/2010 06:11 PM +9:00:
> I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora 12
> and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
>
> /usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such
> file or dir
I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora
12 and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
/usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such
file or directory
I try figure out what happened and go step by step add includes in
CFLAGS l
28 matches
Mail list logo
