this week's i18n meeting

2010-09-29 Thread Jens Petersen
We have the regular weekly i18n project meeting scheduled for tomorrow. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2010-09-30 If you have some agenda topic to discuss particularly for F14, or package updates you want to highlight, etc, please add to the agenda page or follow up to this mail.

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-29 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:14:28 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:45:11 +0200 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: Ok - that's one problem - we sucks in selective updates and information for users. Other could be - change release scheme: 1. very similar to current

Build fails on Koji x86_64 rawhide but not on any other release or arch.

2010-09-29 Thread Randall Berry
Hi, I keep getting the same error trying to build fldigi on rawhide x64 but not on rawhide i686 I don't know what to do to fix it. Attached is the koji build report[1]. I've successfully built the package locally using mock for rawhide on i686 but for some reason the koji build fails on x64

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-29 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu writes: [...] On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:17:23 +0200 Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote: Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca writes: Most of us KDE users want deliberate visible changes to the user. That's the point in having the latest version. Sorry if

Re: poppler update to 0.15.0 (0.16 alpha)

2010-09-29 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:07:02 +0200 Marek Kasik wrote: I plan to update update poppler in rawhide (Fedora 15) to new development version 0.15 next week (at Monday, October 4th). Changes against 0.14.x are: [...] Please check whether your package builds against this new version of poppler

Re: Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test

2010-09-29 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly have been hit by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091 which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD and

Heads Up - xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15)

2010-09-29 Thread Martin Stransky
There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration and so on, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634596#c3 https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_4_for_developers

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Rich Megginson
Gary Morris wrote: ok.. it pulled 389-ds-base-1.2.6-2.fc13.x86_64.. is that ok or do i need to be on 1.2.6-1? On 1.2.6-2 I'm having the same problem. As soon as I start an application that is ldap intensive, the directory server crashes real quick. No errors of any sort reported. No, it

Re: Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly have been hit by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091 which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD and a lot of manual intervention. A

Re: Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test

2010-09-29 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly have been hit by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091 which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD and a lot of

Re: Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test

2010-09-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly have been hit by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091 which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD and a lot of

Re: Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test

2010-09-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 à 09:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly have been hit by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091 which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD and

X Test Week: Radeon Test Day today!

2010-09-29 Thread Adam Williamson
Just a quick reminder that X Test Week continues today with Radeon Test Day - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-29_Radeon . Please do come along and help us test. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

1000 Bug reports

2010-09-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd take a look at my statistics. First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0) Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days Most bugs filed in a day: 7 7

Re: 1000 Bug reports

2010-09-29 Thread James Laska
Greetings, This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list as well since I think this is of value there. On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug report at bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:34:13 -0400 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Brandon Lozza wrote: It seems like the policy would kill the use of an upgraded KDE (4.5 to 4.6) because KDE almost always makes UI changes. The kde-sig

Re: bodhi v0.7.9 deployed

2010-09-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: Again, you're extrapolating way too far from a single problem case. The problem is simply that we have the xorg-x11-drivers metapackage which requires every single X driver and is in the critpath. There's various ways we could adjust this so it's no longer the case. It's

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Noriko Hosoi
On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Gary Morris wrote: ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. / [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch 389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc13.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64

Re: poppler update to 0.15.0 (0.16 alpha)

2010-09-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michal Schmidt wrote: Is poppler_page_get_selected_text() the correct replacement for the old poppler_page_get_text() ? Yes, but you also need to change the y coordinates, see: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/?id=b257428150e2c13dcc24fd8f75e4ee2c679ab414 Kevin Kofler

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Gary Morris
sure.. i'll do that and rerun them.. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Gary Morris wrote: ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. / [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389

Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Meeting 2010-10-01 @ 16:00 UTC

2010-09-29 Thread John Poelstra
When: Friday, 2010-10-01 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT) Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net After a short break from getting the Beta release out the door, it is now time to start focusing on bugs that could block the final release. We can ship the final release of Fedora 14 on time if we

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Could you do thread apply all bt, once you see this Segmentation fault message? Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fe4a23e9710 (LWP 9557)] 0x7fe4d1fc601c in attrlist_find_or_create_locking_optional () from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libslapd.so.0 (gdb)

Re: 1000 Bug reports

2010-09-29 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/29/2010 01:10 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd take a look at my statistics. First bug

[dspam] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 1b263497210129600a54978af0a347ca5903688e Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 14:06:59 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 dspam.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec index

Re: bodhi v0.7.9 deployed

2010-09-29 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 4:15:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Today it's this package. Tomorrow it'll be another one. Sure we can solve this particular problem (but it's taking WEEKS!), but why would that be the only one? See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmxyj6iInMc Now that the

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

2010-09-29 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 29 September 2010 at 18:29, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/9/29 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com: There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration and so on, see:

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-29 Thread dexter
On 29 September 2010 21:07, Kevin Fenzi kevin scrye.com wrote: Currently, it's 4.5.1. So, if we release with that, and then 4.6 comes out and changes the user experence, we would need to see about granting an exception to push that version in F14. Speaking for myself, etc. This fedora kde

Re: REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

2010-09-29 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35:01 +0200,  Tomas Mraz wrote: - Avoid changing the user experence if at all possible. - this is too strong condition. In some cases fixing a bug might inevitable change the user experience and in some cases

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

2010-09-29 Thread Takanori MATSUURA
Hi Chen, For modules/libimg/png, mozilla products use aPNG which was rejected by upstream. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG So we have to use internal png. For media/libvorbis, mozilla has custom patches in the source tree. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517422 Fro

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

2010-09-29 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Chen, For modules/libimg/png, mozilla products use aPNG which was rejected by upstream. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG So we have to use internal png. For media/libvorbis, mozilla has custom patches in the

[perl-Class-XSAccessor] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 3171b7b3b425f0e7468175fe49238ecd3bd86d24 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 14:59:10 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec

[perl-BerkeleyDB] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit a0afb941770b95c4446624700fb7ff893f636989 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 14:58:57 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec

[perl-DBD-SQLite] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit d387a58d1e930acbb75eb1be6bb60d7458bd7792 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 14:59:42 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-DBD-SQLite.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec

[perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit c28849a122093ccd896e7cc64f4130ca7a37ecba Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 14:59:23 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Devel-NYTProf] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 58fa2dd8046442a075ee9a2c45712c1ea4f9fc73 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:01:12 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Devel-NYTProf.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-NYTProf.spec

[perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit ff2d6df9166cc507f8919deddfe996999625f47d Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:01:43 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Mozilla-LDAP] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 0a4b8128a593ce7c3270d4d7bcbbb5412d3c0a52 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:01:58 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec

[perl-PAR-Packer] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 15562d736df9e1e7014d73a458cf8ee657af2d40 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:02:11 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-PAR-Packer.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec

[perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 84d9fd6cde23beb09ee2359c65f50207430a93f8 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:02:26 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Text-Hunspell] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit cf6564420113ea947fb875f96ab86edf92cbd4f9 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:02:49 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Text-Hunspell.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Text-Hunspell.spec

[perl-Variable-Magic] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 49789b5f7e186c77c16816c772bd2dcd71f139a9 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:03:03 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-Variable-Magic.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Variable-Magic.spec

[perl-YAML-LibYAML] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit 9fb2c5397a4a2622ef87c97841dd1239f3eb6493 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 15:03:32 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec

[dspam/f14/master] - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757

2010-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
commit d7a56e15200b3786772c34f5a8dceba2d1feb786 Author: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com Date: Wed Sep 29 22:11:03 2010 -0700 - Rebuilt for gcc bug 634757 dspam.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec index

Re: [389-devel] 1.2.6-1 crash

2010-09-29 Thread Gary Morris
ah.. sorry.. ok.. just retried with 1.2.6.1-1.. [r...@dalp-ct02 logs]# rpm -qa | grep 389 389-dsgw-1.1.5-1.fc13.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.5-1.fc13.noarch 389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc13.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64 389-ds-console-1.2.3-1.fc13.noarch