On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 09:42 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> If an update is known to break dependent software, it breaks it
> whether the
> affected software is in Fedora or not.
I just read up the update policy.[1]
This means you either use rawhide for latest packages (no one uses
rawhide for dev
On Saturday 09 October 2010, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Does this mean that no other package needs openlayers? If this is the
> case, can we update since there won't be any breakages?
If an update is known to break dependent software, it breaks it whether the
affected software is in Fedora or not.
--
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 00:17 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
> No, sorry.
>
> According to the new fedora update rules, an update like openlayers
> 2.8
> -> 2.10 is no longer allowed as the it could break code that is using
> openlayers (e.g. with the OpenLayers.Layer.Google changes).
>
> I have just bu
Hi!
I would like to introduce reviewing package q4wine: Qt4 GUI for wine. It can:*
Work with different wine versions at same time;* Creat, delete and manage
prefixes (WINEPREFIX);* Cd-image use;* Backup and restore for managed
prefixes;* Winetriks support.And other.
Review request is on https://
I've just updated perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to the latest upstream
version in rawhide and f14. This brings a license change from "GPL+ or
Artistic" (aka "same as perl") to "Artistic 2.0".
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Note that yubikeys are not (yet) usable for this. You cannot request the
>> AES key from it (AFAIK), only an OTP. And the OTP can also not be used to
>> unlock
>> an AES key on the harddisk because it is different for each activation.
>
> Can't you use
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 17:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Oh your right. Lemme rethink if there is a better way to articulate my
> thoughts. I was searching for a generic way to say, potentially
> disruptive changes to core packages aren't a good fit for NTH. The NTH
> xorg bug#596557 discussed d
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:31:00PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Will OpenLayers see any more updates for F13? The version available is
> 2.8-5.fc12 while latest upstream is 2.10.
> I'll file an RFE for update if necessary.
No, sorry.
According to the new fedora update rules, an update like openl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 2:48 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
>>> encryption key for disk encryption.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
>> encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
>> not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphras
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH
> > > bugs?
> >
> > I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> > I'd propose
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
> encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
> not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphrase. It would be
> nice to have it on a yubikey instead
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 08:48, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> It sounds like you do not fully understand how the yubikeys work. either that
>> or i dont understand the attack you are describing?
>
> It all comes down to this being based on symmetric crypto, no
On 10/08/2010 08:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able
On 10/08/2010 08:49 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not ab
On 10/08/2010 04:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
> differences.
>
> After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
> for each available branches something similar:
> fedpkg switch-bran
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400
"Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrote:
> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to
> make differences.
...snip...
I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a security
or bugfix only update, right?
kevin
signa
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH bugs?
>
> I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> I'd propose that NTH bugs must be tested and have appropriate bodhi
> karma for them to
=
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=538277&hide_resolved=1
===
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:33 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> All,
>
> I shall be working on some web frontends for ResultsDB, and I have
> been told that y'all already have some mock-ups/ideas for such a
> beast. If so, could y'all point me in the right direction.
I think this was intended for autoq
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
> >>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
> >>> m
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
>> After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
>> for each available branches something similar:
>> fedpkg switch-branch el5;
>> git pull
>> git merge origin/master
>> git push
>> fedpkg bu
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> rhel-6 beta2's
> >> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> >> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> >> new cert ie:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> rhel-6 beta2's
> >> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> >> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> >> new cert i
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > rhel-6 beta2's
> > nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> > anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> > new cert ie
On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:19:46 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >
> > [lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedora-cert -v
> > Verifying Certificate
> > cert expires: 2011-04-06
> > CRL Checking not implemented yet
> > [lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedpkg -v build
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631993
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452403&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 11:09 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> rhel-6 beta2's
>>> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
>>> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot a
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> rhel-6 beta2's
>> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
>> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
>> new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
>> i can't bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> rhel-6 beta2's
> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
> i can't build a
On 10/08/2010 07:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am
Hello,
Will OpenLayers see any more updates for F13? The version available is
2.8-5.fc12 while latest upstream is 2.10.
I'll file an RFE for update if necessary.
--
Thanks!
Regards,
Ankur
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
"FranciscoD"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
On 2010-10-08 10:57:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> > If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
> > Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
>
> Fixing the pam module to not crash mi
All,
I shall be working on some web frontends for ResultsDB, and I have
been told that y'all already have some mock-ups/ideas for such a
beast. If so, could y'all point me in the right direction.
Thanks
John Dulaney
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> On the other hand it has taken us a *long* time to get to the place
> where we are today where churn in RC has been reduced to a bare minimum.
> I still subscribe to the theory (realizing some in Fedora don't) that
> every additional c
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
> for each available branches something similar:
> fedpkg switch-branch el5;
> git pull
> git merge origin/master
> git push
> fedpkg build
> fedpkg update
Does th
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
frysk-0.
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
> Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
Fixing the pam module to not crash might be good. :)
Have you considerd packaging up the server
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Even if you use your yubikey with yubicos servers. and auth against multiple
> different providers your AES key is never exposed to to any of the places that
> you auth to.
That is correct if different service providers auth the OTP against
yubicos serv
Dear Fedora Comunity,
We would like to draw your attention to forthcoming Fedora Test Day focused on
OpenLDAP [1] with TLS encryption.
The crypto implementation for TLS/SSL was recently changed from OpenSSL to
Mozilla Network Security Services (MozNSS). And there are 88 packages
depending on open
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
> >> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
> >>
> >> Farkas Levente wrote:
> >>> hi,
> >>> while try to make a scratch build
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
>>
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> while try to make a scratch build i always got:
>>> -
>>> # fedpkg scra
On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:06:58 am Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > My understanding on this is, and I reserve the right to misunderstand
> > this, is that once the AES key is on the yubikey, there is no way to get
> > it off of there. That key is just used to
In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
differences.
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch el5;
git pull
git merge origin/master
git push
fedpkg build
fedpkg update
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
>
> Farkas Levente wrote:
> > hi,
> > while try to make a scratch build i always got:
> > -
> > # fedpkg scratch-build
> > Could not log into koji: Opening a S
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
> to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
>
> If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
> Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just h
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 08:15:19 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
0:1.3.0
cl
On Fri, 08.10.10 01:21, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It would seem that systemd employs some kind of arbitrary timeout (30
> seconds?) by default and will log "operation timed out. Terminating" if
> things take longer than this time to start up. I would like to know h
Martin Sourada, Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:55:52 +0200:
> but unless someone announces API/ABI changes, you'll notice them only
> after someone fills a bug that your plugin does not work (yes, this is
> precisely the kind of thing that could be caught by usual dependency
> check if mozilla used properly v
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
>>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
>>> much as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process
Hi,
I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
be interesting to add a README.Fedora to
On 10/08/2010 10:49 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote:
> Hello and thanks for minutes; should we consider free to contribute to
> the draft
> page directly, or maybe in the discussion page? Or better in this ml?
I think it would be best to discuss possible improvements on java-devel
mailing list. If propos
2010/10/8 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> * New packaging guidelines (sochotnicky, 17:19:37)
> * LINK:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
> (akurtakov_, 17:22:21)
> * LINK:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
> page
Hi all,
seems that I forgot to send meeting minutes from our last Java SIG
meeting. So here goes...
Summary:
* New packaging guidelines are being created:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
* Wiki to collect monitored packages
- https://fedoraproject
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 01:21:03 -0400 Jon Masters wrote:
> It would seem that systemd employs some kind of arbitrary timeout (30
> seconds?)
60 s
> Certain services, such as kdump.service might require some time to
> recreate their initramfs and will thus never be able to start normally
> (I'm very
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:37:19 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/5/10 2:30 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > Well, how about creating "dist-f14-for-chainbuild" build target and
> > allow people to tag or untag build as/from that tag freely?
> >
> > F
58 matches
Mail list logo
