Re: Default partitioning

2010-10-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/23/2010 06:39 PM, Javier Prats wrote: Hello all, I was wondering if this is the correct place to discuss the default partitioning scheme after installation. If not, could someone please direct me to the correct place? It's as good a

Re: Yubikeys are now supported

2010-10-25 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com writes: On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to not be on the disk

Re: Yubikeys are now supported

2010-10-25 Thread Simon Josefsson
Maxim Burgerhout ma...@wzzrd.com writes: Hi, I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices! If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler.

rawhide report: 20101025 changes

2010-10-25 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Oct 25 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PyKDE4-4.5.2-5.fc15.x86_64 requires PyQt4 = 0:4.8n ScientificPython-2.8-11.fc14.x86_64 requires libmpi.so.0()(64bit)

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20101024 changes

2010-10-25 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 10/24/2010 01:25 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit) rakudo-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libparrot.so.2.7.0()(64bit) Any chance these are going to be fixed before release? I looked at qtgpsc, but that's unlikely to

F15 Feature - online Ex4 defragmentatnion (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15 you have to invoke it with -test options to make it go ;) Word of warning, it's not had a lot of attention, and the whole design could change in the future, but it's something to play with :) -Eric

libpoppler soname bump in rawhide

2010-10-25 Thread Marek Kasik
Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.15.1. There are some API changes and 1 soname bump of libpoppler.so.8 to libpoppler.so.9. API changes mostly involve addition of new functions (see below). You can test it against your package with this scratch-build:

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-25 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Hello: Jesse Keating wrote, at 10/06/2010 07:27 AM +9:00: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and Fedora 15. Items built with this could have

Re: F15 Feature - online Ex4 defragmentatnion (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-25 Thread Eric Sandeen
Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15 you have to invoke it with -test options to make it go ;) Word of warning, it's not had a lot of attention, and the whole design could change in the future, but it's

F-14 Branched report: 20101025 changes

2010-10-25 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Oct 25 13:15:08 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit) rakudo-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libparrot.so.2.7.0()(64bit) Broken deps

Re: F15 Feature - online Ex4 defragmentatnion (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 25 października 2010 17:19 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, 2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15 you have to invoke it with -test options to make it go ;) Word of warning, it's not had a

xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

2010-10-25 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi! xz-5.0.0 is now released and soname is now bumped to 5.0.0 in rawhide. The most important changes are: * The compression settings associated with the preset levels -0 ... -9 have been changed. --extreme was changed a little too. It is now less likely to make compression worse, but with

[Bug 557485] Extra provides need trimming

2010-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557485 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 557485] Extra provides need trimming

2010-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557485 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-25 12:38:23 EDT --- perl-SOAP-Lite-0.710.07-3.el5

Fedora 14 FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting Tuesday, October 26, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC

2010-10-25 Thread John Poelstra
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Tuesday October 26, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is

Re: i686/x86_64 dual install media

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:45 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: Sorry if this has been discussed, but has there every been discussion of a dual 32/64-bit install media? I realize that the default package selection would be reduced but with a high speed connection it shouldn't be too big of an issue.

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20101024 changes

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 12:25 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 10/24/2010 10:17, Branched Report wrote: Broken deps for x86_64 -- qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)

Re: Auto Mounting in Fedora F14 TC6

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 19:31 -0700, Kevin Higgins wrote: I can not tell you exactly which day but approximately Oct 18th auto mount for data DVD's worked and now it does not . Did a clean install to test again. with same result. Blank DVD's auto mount Movies and data DVD's do not auto mount.

Re: xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

2010-10-25 Thread Paul Howarth
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:54 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote: Hi! xz-5.0.0 is now released and soname is now bumped to 5.0.0 in rawhide. The most important changes are: * The compression settings associated with the preset levels -0 ... -9 have been changed. --extreme was

Re: xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:56:27 +0100 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:54 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote: Hi! xz-5.0.0 is now released and soname is now bumped to 5.0.0 in rawhide. The most important changes are: * The compression settings

policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Dave Jones
I did a minimal install yesterday, and was surprised to find that cairo, and a bunch of X libs were still installed. The dependancy chain that pulled them in looks like this.. policycoreutils - dbus-glib - gobject-introspection - fontconfig - cairo Could any part of that chain have its

Re: i686/x86_64 dual install media

2010-10-25 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 25.10.2010 20:49, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:45 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote: Sorry if this has been discussed, but has there every been discussion of a dual 32/64-bit install media? I realize that the default package selection would be reduced but with a high speed

Re: i686/x86_64 dual install media

2010-10-25 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: But a combo x86-32/x86-64 install media OTOH would be very interesting for magazines that want to ship Fedora on a enclosed DVD, as that's cheaper than two and makes way more readers happy than a x86-32 only DVD. Ohh, and a combo install media might be interesting as

Re: xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

2010-10-25 Thread Paul Howarth
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:59:22 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:56:27 +0100 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:54 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote: Hi! xz-5.0.0 is now released and soname is now bumped to

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: I did a minimal install yesterday, and was surprised to find that cairo, and a bunch of X libs were still installed. The dependancy chain that pulled them in looks like this.. policycoreutils - dbus-glib -

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in F14...I'm not sure what can be done reasonably at this point, since all of these packages are critical path. Though I will say that if this was

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Bill Nottingham
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in F14...I'm not sure what can be done reasonably at this point, since all of these packages are critical

Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the passphrase, you get to mount the volume. What I am concerned about is that the

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote: Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the passphrase, you get to mount the volume.

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 00:31, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote: Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 00:31, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote: Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-25 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/10 8:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Hello: Jesse Keating wrote, at 10/06/2010 07:27 AM +9:00: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a gcc build

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 10/25/2010 04:40 PM, nodata wrote: Wouldn't they be restricted based on the contents of the encrypted volume? Yes. Once the volume is mounted it will be treated with normal UNIX permissions. So you would have to create a sub-directory on the volume where the permissions were strict and

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in F14...I'm not sure what can be done

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we didn't notice this

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Unfortunately we

Re: policycoreutils needs cairo.

2010-10-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:52:38 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Having said that, I don't think this seems serious enough to be a blocker, though obviously we'd like the minimal install to be as minimal as possible. Does it cause major problems for any spins? I doubt it,

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 00:40:41 +0200, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote: My point is that if the disk is encrypted, and the user knows the passphrase to access files on the device, then it doesn't make sense to let everyone else see what's on the device as well: it only make sense to

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread Eric Sandeen
nodata wrote: Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the passphrase, you get to mount the volume. What I am concerned

Re: HEADS UP: KDE/Qt update intentions in Fedora 13 (RFC)

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee wrote: On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As there are a few Qt packages

Re: HEADS UP: KDE/Qt update intentions in Fedora 13 (RFC)

2010-10-25 Thread Manuel Escudero
2010/10/25 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee wrote: On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 00:28 +0200, nodata wrote: Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the passphrase, you get to mount

Fedora 14 FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting Tuesday, October 26, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC

2010-10-25 Thread John Poelstra
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Tuesday October 26, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is