On 11/02/2010 05:11 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tuesday 02 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging guidelines. We
would welcome wider discussion/comments at this point. From our point of
view guidelines seem ready for approval by FPC.
Compose started at Wed Nov 3 08:15:18 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
People present:
* orionp
* cspike
* hannes
* sochotni
* mbooth
* ggraz
* tibbs
Overview:
* Maven 3 status
* Maven 3 vanilla package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945
* Custom resolver based on resolver for m2
*
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:12 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api
changes that will require minor adjustment of all users. And there's
quite a few of them (see
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
is missing dist-f14-build-current ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.07-1.el5' was created pointing to:
505f548... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Dependency on perl-libwww-perl missing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649372
Summary: Dependency on perl-libwww-perl missing
Product:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.07-1.el4' was created pointing to:
505f548... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:45:48 +0300, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Hi!
%{_libdir}/girepositry-1.0/ is not owned by any package. It is used,
i.e., in DeviceKit-power-devel. Dmitrij.
On F-14 it's owned by multiple packages:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/
atk-1.32.0-1.fc14.x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584929
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
12:33:25 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2010 09:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
is missing dist-f14-build-current ...
Rich.
This path is deprecated.
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-f14-build/latest/
Koji now
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
Thanks for considering it.
But keep those comments coming, we'll try to keep working on the
guidelines to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-debuginfo is empty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649418
Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger-debuginfo is empty
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:45:16 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE:
Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
with callgraph information.
Soeren's comment from March:
http://lwn.net/Articles/380582/
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
with callgraph information.
Soeren's comment from March:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567282
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457550action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457550action=diff
Description: Simple Paged Results search keeps the connection
per paging, but not an operation. When an abandon
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK packages
should be purged. It's a relic from times that are long gone,
Having a semi-sane way to install multi-vendor multi-version JVMs is
still needed EPEL
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
with callgraph information.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:20:59PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Instead of this, which really is a big performance penalty.
Do you have a sense of the quantification of big
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
Thanks for considering it.
But keep those
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK
packages should be purged. It's a relic from times that are long gone,
Having a semi-sane way to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
15:28:44 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup in the JRE and SDK
packages should be purged. It's a
On 11/03/2010 11:48 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
Lack of decent profiling is a major problem for making our operating
system fast. By far the most effective of profiling is sampling profile
with callgraph information.
I am the author of tsprof, http://bitwagon.com/tsprof/tsprof.html .
Eight years
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
changed ... with default compilation options, getting callgraph
profiling on x86_64 really requires a
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:10:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
changed ... with default compilation
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
3) In my opinion, the whole alternatives setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574195
Sandro Janke bugzilla_red...@penguinpee.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
hi!
This is something I got in my mail box today.
As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for me?
cheers, Bert
the url of the blog of the guy: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/
== the mail ==
Dear Fedoracommunity,
Over the course of the day I recieved 22^3 mails
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:11 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:10:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 20:29 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
It seems like if it was that easy, it would have happened and we'd have
a solution in the upstream kernel...
I think we had one in the upstream kernel for some time, then Linus just
didn't like to see it needing too many bugfixes
On 11/03/2010 01:51 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
[ But yes, 4% is a big hit. 1% I would accept without hesitation.
4% does make me hesitate a little bit. During devel cycles, we
accept much more slowdown than that for the debug kernel,
of course. If we can figure out profiling without frame
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27 +0200,
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 19:27
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
say? (and on this subject, I don't
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
say? (and on this subject, I don't
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:35 -0700, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
not even be used with the top Red Hat
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 23:54 +0200, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
not even be used with the
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Bert Desmet wrote:
hi!
This is something I got in my mail box today.
As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for me?
cheers, Bert
the url of the blog of the guy: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/
== the mail ==
Dear
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
I disagree. I have seen many bugs fixed with the aid of abrt
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
I
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is
On 11/04/2010 03:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it
On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
Orcan
Of the 28 abrt bugs filed against my packages, I think 1 resulted in
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
Orcan
Of
On 11/03/2010 11:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
Just a followup thought... I wonder if abrt could be made smarter /
changed to allow for a preference setting to report on updates-testing
or all updates... I know awhile back I made suggestions on what it would
take in my mind to increase user testing [1]. I see abrt as another way
to help
2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
No need to discuss - it's really useful. I recently closed several
Summary of changes:
7feeb6f... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Class-Accessor-Grouped (*)
b208b07... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
247c613... - subpackage tests, drop t/ from doc - update filtering (pe (*)
32a3b20... dist-git conversion (*)
23b103b...
commit 2d33bfaaa8c200f15a91b058bcb0b3d31818dc3b
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Nov 3 08:24:54 2010 +0100
force architecture dependent installation
perl-Lingua-EN-Tagger.spec | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647124
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
2d33bfa... force architecture dependent installation (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4f509255d768536f7b9e7bb6933b8a2d81bdbeda
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Sep 9 18:52:38 2010 +0200
update to 0.07001
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec | 40 +++
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308
--- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-11-03 04:27:54 EDT ---
Updated build is finally available in rawhide.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626920
--- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
06:45:11 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626920
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit b10dedf726ec5f7129f74b23e3406fc23e7d8035
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 3 10:51:40 2010 -0400
update to 2.27
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec | 36 ++--
sources|2 +-
3 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647503
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 8848553f2d9ea73bab7d89195abf027009f8000d
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 3 11:02:27 2010 -0400
fun with macros
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch.spec
commit c555ed7c71a4f09bc6203ac34e0e9bf92b488f58
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 3 11:28:34 2010 -0400
more fun with macros
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch.spec
commit dd14d886e7f765b7a2d30a30966ec079f2447b60
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Nov 3 11:50:22 2010 -0400
more fun with macros
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
19:09:44 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561383
--- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
19:09:57 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
21:55:24 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548234
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-03
23:09:21 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544738
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-04
00:11:23 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543660
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2010-11-04
00:33:29 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
70 matches
Mail list logo
