On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:07:08 -0500, Digimer wrote:
Try popping by IRC and asking why a particular bug hasn't been acted on.
Does that scale?
If it's a lack of time, then there you go.
I wouldn't expect somebody to lurk on IRC then and visit a ticket just
because someone else makes some
2010/11/8 Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623742 was duped to newer bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624297
The older:
[sorry, skipped]
4-has 48 CCs
This is a known issue in (at least in RedHat's) bugzilla. If you
close bug A
2010/11/8 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
2010/11/8 Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623742 was duped to newer bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624297
The older:
[sorry, skipped]
4-has 48 CCs
This is a known issue in (at
Compose started at Mon Nov 8 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
abrt-gui-1.1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
On 2010-11-06, Vaclav Mocek little@email.cz wrote:
It would be usefull to overwrite some parts of memory (keys etc.),
before the computer is switched off. So, my question is: Is there
already implemented and used some kind of protection?
There was a patch for Linux to scramble memory
On 2010-11-06, Vaclav Mocek little@email.cz wrote:
I work like an Embedded SW/HW Developer and my experience is that data
could remain in the dynamic memory for quite long time, even in the room
temperature. I have used it successfully for debugging, when a booting
routine after the
On 2010-11-08, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
One of the problem is where to store the key. I found a thesis
http://pi1.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/filepool/theses/diplomarbeit-2010-mueller.pdf
right now which describes working implementation using SSE registers as
a permanent (untill power
2010/11/6 Till Maas
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:23:00PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
Why does everyone want to put more and more burden on maintainers and
arguing
about small things that users should do?
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not
On 11/06/2010 02:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the Fedora user
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok there are several different cold boot attacks. The one I think
you are talking about is the removing memory from the system and
reading its contents with a special board. The kernel does not
[snip]
Not even with a
On 11/08/2010 01:34 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 11/06/2010 02:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm
build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to %check
section of ksh spec file. These tests never fails when executed in user's
environment, but some of them always fail when executed as part
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local
rpm build and usual user's environment.
You mean the difference between rpmbuild and... a manual ./configure;
make?
For starters, see rpm's output from
rpm --eval %{configure} which sets
Dear fellow packagers,
I just created a package for auto-complete, an intelligent auto-
completion extension for Emacs.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650992
See screenshots on the project page:
http://cx4a.org/software/auto-complete/
Would anyone want to swap one of their review
I've got some stuff that I can't really give proper attention to, and
I'd rather not even get the bugmail. I just packaged them because I
wanted to consume them, not because I wanted to own them. So, free to a
good home:
bing
bootchart
powertop
wdfs
Already orphaned in pkgdb for rawhide, first
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Would anyone want to swap one of their review tickets for this?
I would like to review the package. Here is mine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858
--
Arun S.A.G
http://zer0c00l.in/
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
bing
wdfs
Hi Adam,
I just took ownership of bing and wdfs.
Thanks!
--
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 11:58 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523634
Added comments with the *latest* example. The bug last had a reply from
the maintainer in 2009. Somehow, he called it a feature request rather
than a bug[1]. *shrug*
[1]
Hello,
I've just orphaned yakuake on all branches ; I do not longer use it.
Regards,
Johan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:49:28PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for
local rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression
tests to %check section of ksh spec file. These tests never fails
when executed in user's
Am 08.11.10 18:22, schrieb Johan Cwiklinski:
Hello,
I've just orphaned yakuake on all branches ; I do not longer use it.
I will take it.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:22:29PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
We can argue about this a lot (e.e. submitter can reopen bug whenever he
finds
the time to verify the bug).
The problem is, there is no proper way to track whether a bug has been
verified, because the result may also be,
powertop
I took powertop, thanks
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
Problem here is that db4o now uses a newer version of mono-cecil and
mono-cecil-flowanalysis. The current fedora version flowanalysis is
something like 0.6 whereas head it 0.9.
However, it's not as simple as building
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:19:17 +, Paul wrote:
deja-dup-15.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()
Lots seem broken with libnotify.so.1 - any chance of pushing rebuilds?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-November/144914.html
--
devel mailing list
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 00:43 +0100, Christian Krause wrote:
Hi,
The whole issue raises now some questions:
1. Specifically with respect to the problem with gdk-pixbuf: Should the
gdk-pixbuf loaders be multilib or not? If yes, the mash script must be
adjusted.
2. Should the mash script be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Patricia:
c88ad7b5da63e34b58c07bece1089ac8 Net-Patricia-1.18_80.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:41 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Really, I have no
problem using my keyboard,
Given your location and native language, I suspect your keyboard layout
is en_US, in which case this isn't much of a surprise - it's one of the
simplest cases (it requires one of the
Hi,
On 11/08/2010 11:15 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
1. Specifically with respect to the problem with gdk-pixbuf: Should the
gdk-pixbuf loaders be multilib or not? If yes, the mash script must be
adjusted.
The loaders are shared objects, and the 64-bit modules won't help you on
32-bit, so
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:19:17 +, Paul wrote:
deja-dup-15.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()
Lots seem broken with libnotify.so.1 - any chance of pushing rebuilds?
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:03:25 +0530, Arun SAG wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Would anyone want to swap one of their review tickets for this?
I would like to review the package. Here is mine
commit 2075f03bc12a7e1a7520f99ceba32741746eff77
Author: Philip Prindeville phil...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Nov 8 16:20:27 2010 -0700
Maintenance version update.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Patricia.spec | 10 +++---
sources|2 +-
3 files
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
bootchart
Adam, I took this package ownership.
best regards
--
Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2010/11/08 18:01 (GMT-0500) Adam Williamson composed:
The duping was done by Lubomir, as he was providing a patch to fix the
problem (which is, lest we forget, what we all wanted in the first
place). He explained his reasoning right in the comment. I don't know
why you think it's a great
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 19:51 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
If the policy can't be clear that _reasonable_ justification is prerequisite
to duping an older bug to a newer, and some semblance of enforcement applied,
then I don't need to file any more bugs, or test any further. I don't see why
On 2010/11/08 18:06 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
I don't see why this is a huge deal. There's a bug in Bugzilla that it
doesn't merge CC lists when you dupe bugs, yeah. Aside from that? What's
the huge problem with duping an older bug to a newer one?
Like I said, let the people who
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 21:30 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2010/11/08 18:06 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
I don't see why this is a huge deal. There's a bug in Bugzilla that it
doesn't merge CC lists when you dupe bugs, yeah. Aside from that? What's
the huge problem with duping an
Hello,
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 21:30 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
Like I said, let the people who actually fix bugs both find them and
file
them.
You need to rethink this. Maintainers(ones who actually fix the bugs)
already have enough work on their hands. Adding look, manage multiple
copies of
On 2010/11/09 07:39 (GMT+0100) David Tardon composed:
Btw, maybe you should look at the proverb in your signature and try to
apply it to yourself. Because in this thread you have neither shown
understanding nor used pleasant words.
The words I used are not inherently unpleasant, only
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650457
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
01a2ba2... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
7207555... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
72aeb15... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
f3b19f0... dist-git conversion (*)
abde086... 1.30 bump (*)
3aeebd4... Merge branch 'master' into
commit 3aeebd4a043cf4eb182fafbfde4e117c8e55d598
Merge: 48e7999 abde086
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 09:44:14 2010 +0100
Merge branch 'master' into el6
Conflicts:
.gitignore
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Log4perl.spec | 29
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650460
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650459
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-11-08 07:12:10
EST ---
Wouldn't be better to send this patch to
commit 1ebb5f0ac96b2935bdf6056cacfe9f030205cde1
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 14:08:57 2010 +0100
New upstream release, v1.09
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Smoke:
1a4b40a9302acca4b4eaf4a1da685b5e Test-Smoke-1.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b4c1dc05feb2d6f3da1f45531d0e0f6a25b226c8
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 14:23:19 2010 +0100
New upstream release, v1.44
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Smoke.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor:
a95b4a9c2d1de7949eca5edfe1a65ccb Class-XSAccessor-1.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 946697d2c081ea10ee8eecbb005e07ff606ff67b
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 14:23:48 2010 +0100
New sources, 1.09
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650460
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650457
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS:
b8d0e8110d2980573d807268bfab0768 JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650459
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
92dd549... Initial import. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649761
Bug 649761 depends on bug 649874, which changed state.
Bug 649874 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Pluggable - Base class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #8 from Sandro Janke bugzilla_red...@penguinpee.nl 2010-11-08
14:43:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Wouldn't
57 matches
Mail list logo
