On 12/11/2010 03:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on
that page. That leads me to believe two things:
1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs
pointed it out to me)
2. It's
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are
Compose started at Mon Dec 13 08:15:06 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
On 12/13/2010 01:14 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:24:15 pm Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
so, can we call the RFE: attach backtrace even when dupe is found ?
or,
On 12/13/2010 02:17 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:14 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:24:15 pm Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
so, can we call the RFE: attach
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:49:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
How did /dev/shm get noexec in Fedora 15 rawhide?
$ grep /dev/shm /proc/mounts
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
$ grep -srl noexec /etc
/etc/alternatives/ld
/etc/fstab ## derived
On 12/13/2010 7:37, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:49:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
How did /dev/shm get noexec in Fedora 15 rawhide?
$ grep /dev/shm /proc/mounts
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
$ grep -srl noexec /etc
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
3) Reporting to bugzilla is a mistake.
Not discounting the idea, but just looking for more detail. What
alternatives would you want to see? More kerneloops-like aggregate data
collection, or something else?
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
As a site administrator, how can I change the default to omit 'noexec'?
mount -o remount,exec ?
That's not really changing the default.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CSS-DOM:
19199828ac5c7b0d6565a81c0e459249 CSS-DOM-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi, everyone! I've already spoken to some developers with big features
for F15 to arrange Test Days, but I just wanted to send out a general
call to remind developers that the Test Day process is available for any
big changes you have landing for F15 (or even little changes, we're not
fussy :).
commit daf4201e6f52cc5f77e44986f82a9e73707ea37b
Author: Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
Date: Mon Dec 13 18:03:23 2010 +0200
- Update to 0.14.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-CSS-DOM.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
The lightweight tag 'perl-CSS-DOM-0.14-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
daf4201... - Update to 0.14.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:59:18AM +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
09.12.2010 17:46, Tom Callaway wrote:
Here are the latest set of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
---
---
Some clarification has been added to the sections dealing with bundled
Dave Jones wrote:
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but there's a pretty big
difference between completely ignoring automatically filed bugs
(regardless of where they're filed), and automatically filing those bugs
upstream.
Of course. But that's why I'm advocating doing the
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
This is not a first time when in see this idea and was already answered
- we're the distro and we're responsible for the packages, filling all
bugs to the upstream will make more harm then good - e.g. crash caused
by our patch or by some library which has different
On 12/13/2010 05:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
This is not a first time when in see this idea and was already answered
- we're the distro and we're responsible for the packages, filling all
bugs to the upstream will make more harm then good - e.g. crash caused
by our patch
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:50 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
3) Reporting to bugzilla is a mistake.
Not discounting the idea, but just looking for more detail. What
alternatives would you want to see? More kerneloops-like aggregate data
On 12/09/2010 09:00 PM, Curtis Doty wrote:
Why must statefull connection tracking be imposed on every Fedora user?
Don't get me wrong. I use netfilter all the time and love it. And it's
good to install the userland iptables tools and a simple firewall by
default. But when I'd like to choose
There are now builds of Natus for all versions of Fedora and EL6. I'd
love some testing and karma if possible. You can find builds here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11322
Bodhi updates are here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/natus
Thanks!
Nathaniel
--
Hi all,
I'm trying to fix the F15 build failure for gpointing-device-settings
reported here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660864
and I'd need some help to understand what's going on. The main issue
was related to a newer gtk version, this one is now fixed.
The other one is
Hi,
It's been quite a while since I've used the big red lizard and
unfortunately, I've lost my password. No problems. Hit the reset button.
As expected, it comes up with that it's sent a token to my email address,
but nothing appears.
Anyone know what the problem may be?
TTFN
Paul
--
devel
On 17 August 2010 10:38, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/17 Christof Damian chris...@damian.net:
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since 12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC
https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
Yes, unfortunately. Despite
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:23 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
It's been quite a while since I've used the big red lizard and
unfortunately, I've lost my password. No problems. Hit the reset
button.
As expected, it comes up with that it's sent a token to my email
address, but nothing
Hi,
On Monday, 13 December 2010 at 23:23, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
It's been quite a while since I've used the big red lizard and
unfortunately, I've lost my password. No problems. Hit the reset button.
As expected, it comes up with that it's sent a token to my email address,
but nothing
Hi,
On Monday, 13 December 2010 at 14:37, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:49:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
How did /dev/shm get noexec in Fedora 15 rawhide?
$ grep /dev/shm /proc/mounts
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
$ grep -srl
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:10:49 +0100, David Malcolm wrote:
Another gratuitous me too, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/RetraceServer
Detailed description:
[...] User sends the coredump [...]
Do you intend to make it default for Fedora?
So far I thought it is not acceptable
Hi,
I've been thinking for sometime now for a GUI for the Fedora Packagers. There
are some steps during the packaging life cycle which needs to be repeated again
and again. So, I was thinking of having some kind of one click system for
updating the packages, like submitting for a koji scratch
The Eclipse team within Red Hat has already developed something called the
Eclipse Fedora Packager:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144570.html
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse_Fedora_Packager_User_Guide
It's still in beta but essentially does what you
On 14/12/10 13:38, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking for sometime now for a GUI for the Fedora Packagers. There
are some steps during the packaging life cycle which needs to be repeated
again and again. So, I was thinking of having some kind of one click system
for updating
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite:
395b9116825d97609532f3307103f431 ORLite-1.47.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 705741ebb880065252a8d97fad87a345cfa3e134
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 13 09:30:26 2010 +0100
Update to 1.47
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ORLite.spec | 48 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662492
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662491
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks:
264a1436883d20b81e669c65a1f97367 HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9bff80ee5c218804ddad78e6ae4bb3c055d0ce81
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 13 10:16:01 2010 +0100
v0.14 release bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662491
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/12/2010 07:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sure, we can't avoid RH's addiction to python, but that's not my point.
It's the impact glueing perl and python together has on upgrades, such
as user-upgrade from Fedora N - Fedora N+1, or python/perl version jumps.
This impact already is
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:25:25AM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com
wrote:
because of bug in paths (vendorarch), there will be needed
rebuild of some packages (~1300). I choose only those
which weren't rebuild with vendorarch
perl-Text-vFile-asData has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils-0.05-4.el6.noarch requires
perl(DateTime::Span)
perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils-0.05-4.el6.noarch requires
perl(DateTime::Format::ICal)
On i386:
rt3 has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
On i386:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
On ppc64:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
Please resolve
perl-AnyEvent has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib)
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(IO::Async::Handle)
On i386:
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-13
14:59:37 EST ---
perl-Net-Patricia-1.19-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-13
15:04:18 EST ---
perl-Net-Patricia-1.19-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659996
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-CSS-DOM-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662811
Summary: perl-CSS-DOM-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
commit 8d6f3efdabd2b34d4cfeb6a1bbba088e6369cfa1
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Dec 14 00:22:56 2010 +0100
Add perl(CGI) to BuildRequires
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Base:
fa1458d8a940ab784d6fc39a8edc0cae Test-Base-0.59.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 722e9d060cde8e802e8d0d7bbdcd00679f7f06ff
Author: Steven Pritchard steven.pritch...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Dec 13 19:27:01 2010 -0600
Update to 0.59.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Base.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
commit 0b301e6905dd6c964ce930b0010f7ff3f6604f42
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Dec 14 05:12:42 2010 +0100
update to 0.017
perl-Config-INI.spec | 18 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-INI.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla:
1f196abda3062476efd1eb2b5db65060 Dist-Zilla-4.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-INI:
0e0a3258d3ba14861cb8730b9e1ef451 Config-INI-0.017.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
abf0a24... update to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a9704c8da064ed83cdda852baaa7b55146a9e6bc
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Dec 14 07:07:34 2010 +0100
- Add BR: perl(CGI) (Fix FTBFS: BZ 660889).
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660889
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
56 matches
Mail list logo
