Offline till Jan 17th

2010-12-31 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Happy new year everyone. I expect/hope to be mostly offline till Jan 17th. List of packages at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/sundaram Some of them do have co-maintainers but not all. Nothing big to handle but I would appreciate if anyone can keep an eye on it. If

Development repo contains *.fc15.i386.rpm packages

2010-12-31 Thread Christoph Frieben
Some time ago, the Fedora default target for 32 bit Intel system moved from i386 (F10) via i586 (F11) to i686 (F12). Nevertheless, even the current development repo contains recent builds ending with *.fc15.i386.rpm. Is there a particular reason for these exceptions or has the build target been

rawhide report: 20101231 changes

2010-12-31 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Dec 31 08:15:08 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.9()(64bit) bacula-director-mysql-5.0.3-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient_r.so.16()(64bit)

Re: Development repo contains *.fc15.i386.rpm packages

2010-12-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:07:02 +0100, Christoph wrote: Some time ago, the Fedora default target for 32 bit Intel system moved from i386 (F10) via i586 (F11) to i686 (F12). Nevertheless, even the current development repo contains recent builds ending with *.fc15.i386.rpm. Is there a particular

Deltarpm python3 build failure

2010-12-31 Thread Jonathan Dieter
I noticed an announcement that Python3 has made some changes in how C modules are built. I now seem to be running into some problems building deltarpm for Rawhide and it seems to be tied into this. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=212117 for more details. Not sure if I

Re: Development repo contains *.fc15.i386.rpm packages

2010-12-31 Thread Christoph Frieben
2010/12/31 Michael Schwendt: Just for clarity, which recent builds are that? Recent means obviously those carrying an fc15 tag. No package later than those built for F11 should be of type i386 at all. ~ C -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Development repo contains *.fc15.i386.rpm packages

2010-12-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:06:55 +0100 Christoph Frieben christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/12/31 Michael Schwendt: Just for clarity, which recent builds are that? Recent means obviously those carrying an fc15 tag. No package later than those built for F11 should be of type i386 at

Re: Development repo contains *.fc15.i386.rpm packages

2010-12-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:06:55 +0100, Christoph wrote: 2010/12/31 Michael Schwendt: Just for clarity, which recent builds are that? Recent means obviously those carrying an fc15 tag. That isn't anything like obvious, because development of Fedora 15 has started _months_ ago, and the .fc15