2011/1/25, Marian Ganisin :
> Hi,
Hi
> Is anyone in contact with this person:
> Account Name: jima
I see jima daily chatting on #ipv6 on freenode.
--
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Looks like it's made the news
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
Cheers
Al
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:10:20 -0500
> Ricky Zhou wrote:
>
> > > Additionally it would be nice to investigate whether
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:10:20 -0500
Ricky Zhou wrote:
> > Additionally it would be nice to investigate whether the account was
> > used to access the test machine resources for package maintainers:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> Good point. We
On 2011-01-25 10:50:48 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Did he really not have write access to the Fedora wiki or the different
> trac instances (wiki, ticket system) on fedorahosted? I am not sure how
> it is handled, but he also might have had push access to the comps repo
> on fedorahosted.
Sorry, these a
This patch adds a systemtap tapset and example to be installed with
perl-devel. The benefit of this is being able to make use of the
recently enabled probe points. You are able to probe subroutine
call/return, the file the subroutine was defined in, and line number.
These new files are only i
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:14:23AM +1000, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> The account in question was not a member of any sysadmin or Release
> Engineering
> groups. The following is a complete list of privileges on the account:
> * SSH to fedorapeople.org (user permissions are very limited on this
> m
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (12:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #516 Updates policy adjustments/change
On 01/25/2011 10:58 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> reconsider the OnlyShowIn=KDE; for System Settings
> * ''AGREED'' to not enable it by now and ask upstream what they think
> * reasons are
> ** we cannot add KDE to the name as we will break translations
In GNOME 3, there is a system settings as wel
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability for testing of
Alpha 1 of version 1.2.8. This release contains many bug fixes. On
those platforms which have OpenLDAP built with Mozilla NSS crypto
support (Fedora 14 and later), the packages are built with OpenLDAP
instead of the Mozilla L
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 04/2011
Time: 2011-01-25 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.o
On 01/24/2011 10:07 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Because everything that's not an Atom should be using x86_64 these days
> (unless it's ancient, in which case you can't be aiming at performance that
> much or you'd have already bought a newer, much faster CPU ;-) ).
I can't wait to try that on my bra
On 01/25/2011 02:54 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:16 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
>>> 'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
>>
>> I don't think so... IIUC, R
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Although, pedantically, I have to point out that the 1%s you list are not
> > all synonymous.
> Indeed, a 1% reduction in CPU time per process is a 1.0101…% increase in
> processes/hr. ;-) But that's being very pedantic. ;-)
Yeah t
Hi,
package maintainer of conserver doesn't seem to respond on open issues.
I tried to push him (kindly):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667118
Unfortunately without response.
Is anyone in contact with this person:
Account Name: jima
Full Name: Patrick Laughton
Email: j...@jima.tk
On 01/24/2011 11:16 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
>> 'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
>
> I don't think so... IIUC, Requires(post) only applies until installation
> is com
For three days last week I attended a conference on application
installing in Germany, hosted by Vincent Untz and the other guys from
Novell.
There were people sent from Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, Suse, and
Mandriva. From Fedora both I and Florian Festi attended.
The idea of the conference was to ta
On 01/24/2011 09:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rich Megginson (rmegg...@redhat.com) said:
>> Ok. Do I need any Requires at all for this? Or should I just
>> remove that line from the spec?
>
> I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
> 'Requires(post)' should be sufficient
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:07:40PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Is this a bug in the spec file or in rpm?
> >
> > $ rpmls -p bind-libs-lite-9.7.3-0.4.b1.fc15.i686.rpm
> > lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libdns-export.so.69
> > -rw-r--r-
18 matches
Mail list logo
