Roland McGrath wrote, at 02/25/2011 10:16 AM +9:00:
>> component: CCfits (sergiopr)
>>file:
>> CCfits-debuginfo-2.3-2.fc15.i686/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/7236759b8c63fab2925bd308123b9b277a238c
>> - unused debuginfo, binary is not packaged: /usr/bin/cookbook
>
> The debuginfo is collected
> component: CCfits (sergiopr)
> file:
> CCfits-debuginfo-2.3-2.fc15.i686/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/7236759b8c63fab2925bd308123b9b277a238c
>- unused debuginfo, binary is not packaged: /usr/bin/cookbook
The debuginfo is collected from the %buildroot directories. There is an
rpmbuild check
Le 25/02/2011 02:13, Ben Boeckel a écrit :
> Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>> %define _enable_debug_packages %{nil}
>> %define debug_package %{nil}
>
> Is the first required now? Currently only the second is used.
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ghc-libmpd.git;a=blob;f=ghc-libmpd.spe
Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> %define _enable_debug_packages %{nil}
> %define debug_package %{nil}
Is the first required now? Currently only the second is used.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ghc-libmpd.git;a=blob;f=ghc-libmpd.spec;h=4696b69987012aaedc81160fe1dd7b72235b70c9;hb=HEAD
-
Le 25/02/2011 01:57, Ben Boeckel a écrit :
> Karel Klic wrote:
>
>
> Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
> libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
> pattern can be gathered as well.
>
> --Ben
>
why not just disabling debuginfo g
Karel Klic wrote:
Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
pattern can be gathered as well.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 2011-02-24 at 16:02-05 Josef Bacik wrote:
> I think that if I could get a large base to test for F15 that we
> could squash most/all of the problems that crop up from that to be
> in great shape for default in F16.
I think you'd increase your chances of getting lots of testers for
F15+btrfs if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677705
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480865&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480865&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
On 24/02/11 15:44, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
>> (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next
>> time you boot up).
>
> Honestly I think
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:25:44PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> For me essential services are the services that are required to start
> other services. If there are no services required to boot Fedora, login
> as root and start other services, then I do not see any point of
> requiring services to be
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:32:44PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:04:26PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > And once you've got a default set for the default install, why not just
> > > do it at the p
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:51:37PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 01:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > There are no essential services, which means any proposal that contains
> > the phrase "non-essential services" is already unimplementable.
> >
>
> HID services (keyboard/mo
commit b18e70153de82c486ae0ecfa0f2dd64544b9a6c3
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Thu Feb 24 22:16:13 2011 +0100
Update to 0.32
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Config-Auto.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --gi
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 23.2.2011 20:49, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
>> btrfs does the former without anywhere near as much of the latter.
>
> BTRFS so far only makes my kernel panicking as it did anytime I have
> been trying it since Fedora 9 (yes, I am crazy). Thi
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:51:37PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 01:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > There are no essential services, which means any proposal that contains
> > the phrase "non-essential services" is already unimplementable.
> >
>
> HID services (keyboard/mo
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Auto:
5292cc99be2cf78ca205e62ec180f429 Config-Auto-0.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 02/24/2011 01:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There are no essential services, which means any proposal that contains
> the phrase "non-essential services" is already unimplementable.
>
HID services (keyboard/mouse) might be nice ... :-) :-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 02/24/2011 08:44 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 23.2.2011 20:49, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
>> btrfs does the former without anywhere near as much of the latter.
> BTRFS so far only makes my kernel panicking as it did anytime I have
> been trying it since Fedora 9 (yes, I am crazy). This is absolut
On 2011-02-23 at 23:32-06 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 05:38 PM, James Ralston wrote:
>
> > None of these issues is a dealbreaker, but they *are* losses of
> > functionality versus what LVM offers.
>
> LVM isn't going anywhere. It just won't be the default during a
> fresh install
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:04:26PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > And once you've got a default set for the default install, why not just
> > do it at the package level and ensure some level of consistency?
>
> Because by enabling
On 02/24/2011 05:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> that said, I do think it would make sense to offer some command to
> enable all modules that were originally enabled, to get a working system
> back if you broke it. Something in the sense of #630174.
Hum
You probably would need to implement som
Se você não conhece Emilio Fernandes, ignore esta mensagem de email.
Se você não pode clicar nos links, clique em « Mostrar conteúdo » e tente
novamente.
Olá,
Finalmente, um sistema inteligente e simples para gerenciar seus contatos!
Com UNYK, eu reuni todos os meus contatos num mesmo cad
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:42:54AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > "May" as in "Are allowed to". It's always going to be the package
> > maintainers call in the end - we're not going to mandate it.
>
> Okay; it's not worth going throug
On Thu, 24.02.11 09:06, Garrett Holmstrom (gho...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
>
> On 2/24/2011 8:14, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Some people have been asking us to extend the systemd unit file header
> > to include information about whether a service should be on or off by
> > default (Michal!),
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Garrett Holmstrom
wrote:
>
> So whether or not a given package will be enabled by default after I
> tell yum to install it depends on which spin, if any, that I initially
> installed my system with? Why should the initial package set that my
> system came up with
On 2/24/2011 8:14, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Some people have been asking us to extend the systemd unit file header
> to include information about whether a service should be on or off by
> default (Michal!), like chkconfig had it. But after thinking about this
> we came to the conclusion that th
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:23:06PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 23.02.11 17:38, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > I just made a couple changes to the first table of this page:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet#Services
> >
> > The chkc
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:04:26PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> And once you've got a default set for the default install, why not just
> do it at the package level and ensure some level of consistency?
Because by enabling lots of potential vulnerable services you make it a
PITA to use Fedora
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:53:07 +0100, Karel wrote:
> Is this explanation understandable?
Yes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:43PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Right. I think the reasonable expectation here is that if you (as a
> user) don't want the service, don't install the package. If you (as a
The package is more than just the service. It will also include the
documentation and th
On 02/24/2011 04:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Fedora is intended to be a functional distribution, not merely a toolbox
> for SIGs to build functional distributions.
>
The project has already outgrown that purpose...
It's just taking several people some time to let go and realize that a
"Defau
commit 1ef11607c324bb466d07f939227df2a87f848eeb
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Feb 24 17:31:55 2011 +0100
update to 0.14
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-Strict.spec | 14 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff -
Hi,
2011/2/24 Matthew D Truch :
> Sorry for the mostly off-topic post, but google hasn't been my friend
> lately and I don't know where to turn.
>
> We've had a few machines (mostly non-Fedora machines) which seem to have
> a kind of rootkit installed on them, and write data to a file called
> /va
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:58:25PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 03:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > "May" as in "Are allowed to". It's always going to be the package
> > maintainers call in the end - we're not going to mandate it.
> >
>
> Hum not following you..
>
> If u
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Strict:
d1ef5921787195141ba47b017cd5bce5 Test-Strict-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
commit afaa28483eb51a77b0fee51f73674d73780e34a4
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Feb 24 17:25:51 2011 +0100
update to 0.98
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-Simple.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
Summary of changes:
a9dad82... update to 0.13 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit a9dad82f10ff963fc3c44ce8c8e5061576673ad3
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Feb 24 17:22:01 2011 +0100
update to 0.13
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Scope-Upper.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Simple:
a8b26c97440269b33dd79fd847c521d8 Test-Simple-0.98.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Scope-Upper:
f2bf0e6c31c1c5fb4f7f3689d0735c4a Scope-Upper-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Thu, 24.02.11 15:04, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Greetings.
> > >
> > > FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
> >
Sorry for the mostly off-topic post, but google hasn't been my friend
lately and I don't know where to turn.
We've had a few machines (mostly non-Fedora machines) which seem to have
a kind of rootkit installed on them, and write data to a file called
/var/run/.defunct among other non-niceties.
On Thu, 24.02.11 09:44, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
> > (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next
> > time yo
On 02/24/2011 03:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> "May" as in "Are allowed to". It's always going to be the package
> maintainers call in the end - we're not going to mandate it.
>
Hum not following you..
If ultimately packagers can override this then is this [1] being worked on?
I thought the wh
On 24.2.2011 at 16:17, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel wrote:
>
>> - debuginfo symlink points to another binary in another RPM package
>> which might not be installed
>>
>
> Which is perfectly normal for subpackages, isn't it?
>
> There is only a single -
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> "May" as in "Are allowed to". It's always going to be the package
> maintainers call in the end - we're not going to mandate it.
Okay; it's not worth going through the details if you guys already
discussed and rejected it, we've lived fo
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > We considered that option, but it's not just about the desktop install -
> > you need a default set for a default install,
>
> "Default install"? This is @base from anaco
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > Greetings.
>> >
>> > FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
>> > (ie, you install s
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:07:17 +0100, Dodji wrote:
> > This new path requires you to convince an existing maintainer
> > to mentor you in the processes and guidelines of package maintenance,
> > and would allow you to be sponsored by FESCo or an existing sponsor to
> > co-maintain those package(s) w
2011/2/24 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 02/23/2011 10:08 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 23 lutego 2011 21:48 użytkownik Tomasz Torcz
>> napisał:
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integrat
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel wrote:
>- debuginfo symlink points to another binary in another RPM package which
> might not be installed
>
Which is perfectly normal for subpackages, isn't it?
There is only a single -debuginfo package for a src.rpm, but the src.rpm
may build mult
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote:
> >
> > > BN> Orphan: apel
> > > BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> > > BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> >
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
> > (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next
> > time you bo
On 02/24/2011 02:42 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> This link contains at least in my case incorrect unit files, which were
> not applied. I received duplicates of bugs on my daemons. Proposed
> patches in these bugzillas were wrong or incomplete.
> There should be at least fixed links on web-page t
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
> I have written a script which checks the completeness and correctness of the
> debuginfo packages.
Thanks, it would be great to run it automatically like the `Broken deps'
checker.
> Regarding the report below: it is interesting that /usr/b
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
> (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next
> time you boot up).
Honestly I think it'd be conceptually a lot simpler if all service
On 02/23/2011 10:08 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 23 lutego 2011 21:48 użytkownik Tomasz Torcz
> napisał:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
>>> hope that there is more sys
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I still have unupstreamed patches here which would allow us to start
> CUPS automatically when a local client needs it or when a printer is
> plugged in.
I think that's separate from the issue of whether the service is allowed
to star
> Orphan: beagle
> kerry requires beagle = 0.3.9-19.fc14
I'll take beagle
--
Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/23/2011 06:01 PM, James Ralston wrote:
> On 2011-02-23 at 13:41-05 Peter Jones wrote:
>> dm-crypt still just throws REQ_FLUSH away instead of figuring out
>> the block remaps involved and issuing the right bios. Of course,
>> this is a problem with dm-crypt and _any_ filesystem.
>
> Are yo
Dne 23.2.2011 20:49, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
> btrfs does the former without anywhere near as much of the latter.
BTRFS so far only makes my kernel panicking as it did anytime I have
been trying it since Fedora 9 (yes, I am crazy). This is absolutely not
meant as anything personal against Josef
On Thu, 24.02.11 09:29, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Some questions:
> >
> > * Do you know of/maintain another service that should start by default?
> > Why?
>
> CUPS currently starts by default. The reason is that, even wh
On Wed, 23.02.11 21:29, Chris Ball (c...@laptop.org) wrote:
>
> Hi Lennart,
>
>> My hope is that one day we can ship a read-only root dir by
>> default, or more specifically a btrfs file system with three
>> subvolumes in it: one read-only one mounted to /, and two
>> writable on
On Wed, 23.02.11 17:38, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I just made a couple changes to the first table of this page:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet#Services
>
> The chkconfig frozbozz --levels 345 on line listed systemctl enable
> frozbozz.service a
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> This new path requires you to convince an existing maintainer
> to mentor you in the processes and guidelines of package maintenance,
> and would allow you to be sponsored by FESCo or an existing sponsor to
> co-maintain those package(s) with your mentor guiding you.
Thank
I tested the live image and reproduced a problem seen with the nouveau
test day image (and added more detail here)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679404
I hope something can be done for this or F15 will be off limits for
machines like mine (Nvidia Ion netbook)
-Cam
--
devel mailing
On 02/23/2011 06:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default
> (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next
> time you boot up).
>
> We have a draft at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Default
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 02/24/2011 08:48 PM +9:00:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote:
>>
>>> BN> Orphan: apel
>>> BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
>>> BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
>>
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote:
>
> > BN> Orphan: apel
> > BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> > BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> > BN> emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> > BN> f
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote:
> BN> Orphan: apel
> BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> BN> emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> BN> flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12
> BN> migemo-emacs requires ap
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
35446dd... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
35446dd... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc14' was created pointing to:
35446dd... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc13' was created pointing to:
35446dd... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.el6' was created pointing to:
35446dd... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 23:26, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan python-flickrapi
I'll take that one.
Maxim Burgerhout
ma...@wzzrd.com
EB11 5E56 E648 9D99 E8EF 05FB C513 6FD4 1302 B48A
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary
Summary of changes:
35446dd... Update to 1.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Summary of changes:
35446dd... Update to 1.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 24 February 2011 04:20, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 05:26 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Orphan glib-java
>> Orphan libgconf-java
>> Orphan libglade-java
>> Orphan libgnome-java
>> Orphan libgtk-java
>> Orphan libvte-java
>
> We should consider flushing all of these along with frysk (or,
On 02/24/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Yea, fsck integration is something i've wanted to add to plymouth for
> a long time.
Yeah I might say it's rather needed
The novice end user behaviour I saw when fsck was running in the
background was *interesting* but not *surprising*..
The novic
Dne 23.2.2011 23:26, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
> Orphan rubygem-eventmachine
> Orphan rubygem-fastthread
> comaintained by: kanarip
> Orphan rubygem-gem_plugin
> Orphan rubygem-mongrel
> comaintained by: kanarip
I took these
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I created 4 updates by specifying the 4 builds on the new update form
> and submitting it once, creating 4 updates at the same time, which
> is what I thought he was doing.
Yes that's what I'm doing and, IIRC, I did it in the past without any
Greetings,
Thanks for your attention on F-15 Alpha RC#1 test event. Alpha priority
tests and most of other test cases against installation and desktop have
been executed and a list of bugs are classified as below:
Installation *
* F15Alph
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Some questions:
>
> * Do you know of/maintain another service that should start by default?
> Why?
CUPS currently starts by default. The reason is that, even when
printing over the network as a client, this service is required to be
run
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:26:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan tetex-tex4ht
Taken.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá,
kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vů
85 matches
Mail list logo
