On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:52:24PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
Well, given that libc.so and ld.so are shared libraries with
with meaningful e_entry, so you can actually run
/lib/ld-2.*.so or
On 03/24/2011 06:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
I have Ubuntu 10.10 i686:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421892 2011-01-21 15:08 /lib/libc-2.12.1.so
[...snip more libc examples...]
libc is probably a
2011/3/24 Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository
On 10:33:31 AM Wednesday, March 23, 2011 Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was
On 03/24/2011 01:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
ser's problem is
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl
which looks to me to be a flex incompatibility unrelated to mysql.
Probably needs BR flex-static.
Yup, you're right. It's been FTBFS for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
minimum, ideally also devel
On 03/24/2011 04:36 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailListsli...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a different optimization but that one requires gold.
Are there some serious Bugs why Fedora is not using it?
Thanks,
Jan
--
devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202210
--- Comment #12 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-03-24
10:00:27 EDT ---
I suppose this is bug in packaging.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: Please build perl-SOAP-Lite for EPEL6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690513
Summary: RFE: Please build perl-SOAP-Lite for EPEL6.
Fedora 15 switches to systemd as default init system. The developer still
works for coding and fixing the bugs. We should appreciate that developers
give us such a fast init system to improve boot time. However we do not know
what it changes from old version to new one. The changelog has just one
=?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2VsYSBNYcWhbMOhxYhvdsOh?= mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Probably needs BR flex-static.
I've applied BR and build ser
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2940159
Thanks for that. As of now we have 75 packages in
TL == Tom Lane t...@redhat.com writes:
TL Do we need to wait around for somebody to fix these stragglers, or
TL can we go ahead and release dist-f15-mysql into the general
TL f15-testing pool?
Please do not wait on zoneminder. It was broken before this due to an
unrelated issue which should be
Hi,
2011/3/24 Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com:
Fedora 15 switches to systemd as default init system. The developer still
works for coding and fixing the bugs. We should appreciate that developers
give us such a fast init system to improve boot time. However we do not know
what it changes
On 03/24/2011 03:28 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 03/24/2011 06:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
I have Ubuntu 10.10 i686:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421892 2011-01-21 15:08 /lib/libc-2.12.1.so
[...snip
2011/3/23 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz:
Dan Horák píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:30 +0100:
Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400:
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be
needed mass rebuild.
Of course, all
FWIW
I meant FWIU :)
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:00 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a different optimization but that one requires gold.
Are there some
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com writes:
FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because
have been already rebuilt?
If you have a package that uses libmysqlclient.so, and it's not already
listed in koji list-tagged dist-f15-mysql, please go ahead and build
it there with
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
Please do not wait on zoneminder. It was broken before this due to an
unrelated issue which should be fixed up soon. Unless this Mysql bump
introduces some significant incompatibility problem everything should be
fine when I get the latest
2011/3/24 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com writes:
FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because
have been already rebuilt?
If you have a package that uses libmysqlclient.so, and it's not already
listed in koji list-tagged dist-f15-mysql,
Yes
Tom Lane wrote, at 03/25/2011 12:23 AM +9:00:
=?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2VsYSBNYcWhbMOhxYhvdsOh?=mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Probably needs BR flex-static.
I've applied BR and build ser
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2940159
Thanks for
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:06:09 +0100, Adam Jackson wrote:
For example, if I'm the X server, I have a bunch of symbols exported
from the binary that the drivers are expected to call, but that are
never called from the server itself. Does marking a function
__attribute__((visibility(default)))
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:31:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
So, is it true that the convention is 0644 in Debian and 0755 in Red
Hat-land? If so, does anyone know why the difference, and if this needs
to stay different forever? Also, I presume
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 07:59 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 11:59 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/24/2011 03:28 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 03/24/2011 06:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
I have Ubuntu 10.10 i686:
collectd is a high performance monitoring / stats collection daemon.
It is quite widely used judging by the number of bugs and feedback we
get for it.
I just orphaned collectd in Fedora 15 Rawhide. I did the original
packaging, but haven't really been involved with it for a long time;
Alan
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp writes:
gmyth built, now gstreamer-plugins-bad-free is waiting for new-repo
on chain-build.
Thank you, looks like those both went through fine. Meanwhile
I've identified the collectd failure, and it's indeed not related
to mysql (bz #690558).
Genes MailLists wrote:
Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org and install it
in /usr/local/
I don't think bypassing package management is something we want to
recommend.
Not only is stuff installed that way not built according to Fedora
guidelines, which leads to issues
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/14/remi/i386/repoview/
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/14/remi/x86_64/repoview/
Never install any software without a RPM if there is no really good
reason and firfox 4 is available is really no reason even if
that would
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 18:39 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
but it is also hard to uninstall without leaving residual files, which also
implies that upgrades sometimes leave old versions of the files sitting
around.
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you
On 03/24/2011 12:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
FWIW, on my F14 all the .so libs in /lib are executable, and all but
three segfault (and trigger abrt) when executed. Besides the already
mentioned libc-2.13.so and ld-2.13.so, only libpthread-2.13.so
runs successfully to print a legal notice
On 03/22/2011 06:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The Fedora 15 Test Day schedule continues to roll, and this week it's
the turn of power management:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24
I would like to participate but the live CD .iso (linked to in the above
page) downloads at
Adam Williamson wrote:
So, I just ran into an interesting issue talking over Fedora patches
with the upstream glew maintainer. glew installs its shared libraries
'manually', not using autotools / libtools; upstream installs them with
permissions of 0644, and we patch this to 0755. After
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
Did they really manage to stuff even the resources into the binary? Wow,
very un-unixy! ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Here are the changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for this week:
---
The Packaging:PHP guidelines have been updated to reflect that PEAR
documentation provided by upstream are installed in %{pear_docdir},
should stay there, and must be marked as %doc.
Additionally, the definition of
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
Did they really manage to stuff even the
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Sorry I was being too tentative. I meant to point out that the 755 perms
don't seem to do anything useful (except possibly for ld.so, which I
still don't quite understand what it is), and have definite negative
effects (abrt noise). Therefore, I was going to suggest
drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
Did they really manage to
2011/3/24 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think this discussion goes in the wrong direction. Firefox 4 is (for
me) a working browser that I want to use. Without a proper rpm the
tarball is the only solution left. Spot's solution circumvents the
xulrunner
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2011-03-25
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings!
The third Beta blocker review meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC
in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll spend time reviewing
On 24.03.2011 19:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
Did they really manage to stuff even the resources into the binary? Wow,
very
The Fedora 15 development cycle is well under way, and making good
progress. Yesterday I met[1] with Release Engineering, QA, the Fedora
Program Manager, and we decided that in order to accommodate some
late-breaking changes, we're going to need to slip the Fedora 15
release schedule by a week in
On 24.03.2011 19:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
'uninstall'. :)
Did they really manage to stuff even the resources into the binary? Wow,
very
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:00:52PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
[...]
Two bugs were found in Bodhi's tag handling logic and we're hoping for
fixes in the next day or so. Once those fixes are in and we've verified
that the tests are pulling in packages correctly, we'll re-enable
AutoQA's Bodhi
There will be an outage starting at 2011-03-24 18:00 UTC, which will last
approximately X hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-03-24 18:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Moving from EL5 nagios to EL6
I just built a new libedit snapshot (20110227) for Rawhide and F-15 to
pick up some bug fixes. This rebuild doesn't involve an soname
change, but I thought I should give a heads-up anyway, for two
reasons.
First, I previously did an update to the 20100424 snapshot on February
7, the same day as
On 03/24/2011 07:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the particular case of Firefox, this isn't a problem, as it just
gives you one giant static executable...so it's very easy to
Ugh. I put in the wrong date:
The outage will be 2011-03-25 1800 UTC and last 2 hours.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 16:26, Stephen Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
There will be an outage starting at 2011-03-25 18:00 UTC, which will last
approximately X hours.
To convert UTC to your local time,
Compose started at Thu Mar 24 13:15:45 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:06, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:00 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a
Summary of changes:
6501d2a... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
dfbda43... Initialize branch EL-4 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
e7c4bb4... Spec cleanup (*)
01014e5... Spec cleanup (*)
bc0ce1b... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
commit a6602bfb7fac4e0e5230c426e8cf0a0962fe7825
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 10:51:20 2011 +
Tidy changelog entries
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec
commit 0e5efb053611581b9debae4fe75d260ba47e4690
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 10:57:59 2011 +
Update to 0.02
New upstream release 0.02
- Fixed a bug affecting input strings with an odd number of characters
- Cleaned up Makefile.PL
- Removed
commit b017cb2f0cdd1a37949bd564fdbfeb7fc9607f85
Merge: 4912fae 0e5efb0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:00:41 2011 +
Merge branch 'master' into f13
Conflicts:
.gitignore
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec |
commit 71ca572c92071ed9eb9e94d2f63f45f4f6ba1806
Merge: 39acc63 b017cb2
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:03:59 2011 +
Merge branch 'master' into el5
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec
.gitignore|
commit e2576c4d0899942d9d92c2efba92ea1d227e27d4
Merge: ea11c81 71ca572
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:06:03 2011 +
Merge branch 'master' into el4
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec
.gitignore|
commit 18ba90115f2fa932766bcfff71a034bd823fcd2c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:12:50 2011 +
Nobody else likes macros for commands
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec | 23 ---
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 549ff448d45ec538953f4ebf23a05d97782ec867
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:14:48 2011 +
Use %{_fixperms} macro instead of our own chmod incantation
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 9ac49e71188a4aaf294102eab6c52119047bac53
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 24 11:26:08 2011 +
Run author tests
Add buildreqs perl(Digest::SHA1), perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Synopsis)
and run author tests
perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec | 15
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble:
4d7edd5b0a904db8194aa660d502fbe0 Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6501d2a... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
dfbda43... Initialize branch EL-4 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
e7c4bb4... Spec cleanup (*)
01014e5... Spec cleanup (*)
bc0ce1b... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690443
Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.12 is available
Product:
Summary of changes:
6501d2a... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
dfbda43... Initialize branch EL-4 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
e7c4bb4... Spec cleanup (*)
01014e5... Spec cleanup (*)
bc0ce1b... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
Summary of changes:
6501d2a... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
dfbda43... Initialize branch EL-4 for perl-Digest-BubbleBabble (*)
e7c4bb4... Spec cleanup (*)
01014e5... Spec cleanup (*)
bc0ce1b... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
Summary of changes:
55b41bb... Buildrequire perl-devel for Fedora 7 onwards (*)
6a55c06... Buildrequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (*)
d4d8242... Clarify license as GPL v1 or later, or Artistic (same as pe (*)
1237b2b... Rebuild for new perl (*)
0458e33... perl rebuild, chain 4 (*)
Summary of changes:
406491e... Rebuild for perl 5.8.8 (FC5) (*)
9258845... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/FC6MassRebuil (*)
6446445... FE6 mass rebuild (*)
55b41bb... Buildrequire perl-devel for Fedora 7 onwards (*)
6a55c06... Buildrequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (*)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690443
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690442
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-EditorTools:
39ac50a5790ed095dfd39bad90b14109 PPIx-EditorTools-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.el4' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 493e15d74084d67d6e9831f68e454433664ec741
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 24 13:01:16 2011 +0100
0.12 bump, buildroot garbage cleanup
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec | 16 ++--
sources|2 +-
3
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.el5' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.fc13' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.fc14' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.fc15' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.02-1.fc16' was created pointing
to:
9ac49e7... Run author tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Adapter:
4a1dbb281eac71f666d2eeccf4cc8b99 Class-Adapter-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
493e15d... 0.12 bump, buildroot garbage cleanup (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690443
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-24
08:22:45 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-03-24 09:26:17
EDT ---
Created attachment 487328
--
commit 6d9154862cced650dc97c7e5c3f7574c489f8974
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 24 13:09:11 2011 +0100
1.08 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Adapter.spec | 20 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+),
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690442
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690513
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690513
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690513
--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-03-24 11:19:46
EDT ---
Sorry , that's embarrassing.
Steve.
--
commit 648fc15f5401c0368ebca67037f2f12c70ce1305
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 24 13:35:24 2011 -0400
initial package
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0
Summary of changes:
d2b6e86... Tidy up changelog entry (*)
3aa0a88... EPEL 4/5 compatibility fixes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-YAML-Valid-0.04-5.el5' was created pointing to:
3aa0a88... EPEL 4/5 compatibility fixes
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690649
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=487435action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Here are the changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for this week:
---
The Packaging:PHP guidelines have been updated to reflect that PEAR
documentation provided by upstream are installed in %{pear_docdir},
should stay there, and must be marked as %doc.
Additionally, the definition of
92 matches
Mail list logo
