On 4/6/2011 11:11, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages) which
does just that.
Keeping with the
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:11:26PM -0500, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
Hello everyone,
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages)
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the
process.
It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild
support)
and is quite ugly :)
I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
Is yes for F14, what sort of time frame would we be looking at for
availability?
CD99E035AC72E359508CD3A58A335BD6
--
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.auwrote:
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or
solely for Fedora 15?
The later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au
wrote:
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au wrote:
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au
wrote:
Is the final
-Original Message-
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au
wrote:
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011
On 04/07/2011 03:46 PM, Chris Jones wrote
Well when I installed Gnome-Shell just the other day it was only a ~10MB
download and the installation was simple and didn't seem to alter anything.
Am I getting confused or something between Gnome 3 and Gnome-Shell. Are they
two different packages or
I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
root partition was not available), then panic.
Two subsequent attempts to reboot failed because
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early
3 or my packages are now parentless:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
root
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 04/07/2011 07:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
I updated my rawhide VM today (on F15 host), but it failed to reboot
using the new kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.39-0.rc1.git5.0.fc16.x86_64
I got a failure (VFS diagnostic complaining that the UUID-specified
root partition was not
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:12:11 +0200
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
perhaps it is possible to add the overall count of packages available
in fedora. So we could calculate the number of updates relative to
the total number of packages. To me this seems to be a very
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
Two subsequent attempts to reboot failed because even though I got
to the grub kernel-selection menu, I was unable to get a response
out of the interface, so couldn't select any other kernel or even
edit a grub stanza. Luckily for me, on the third
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au wrote:
Well when I installed Gnome-Shell just the other day it was only a ~10MB
download and the installation was simple and didn't seem to alter anything.
Am I getting confused or something between Gnome 3 and Gnome-Shell.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have
been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to
build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a see, it
_can_ be done lark.
I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the process, hundreds, maybe
even a
Matt Domsch wrote:
As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have
been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to
build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a see, it
_can_ be done lark.
I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the process,
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote:
I think FTBFS has been valuable.
But of course!
Sure, I get the occasional why are you filling my mailbox with this
message, [...]
Wow. Unbelievable.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote:
I think FTBFS has been valuable.
But of course!
Sure, I get the occasional why are you filling my mailbox with this
message, [...]
Wow. Unbelievable.
How dare you provide me with helpful
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
someone else should take it on now?
Absolutely!
Actually, have you published you use to BFS the scripts anywhere?
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite-debuginfo 0.712-2 is empty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694559
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite-debuginfo 0.712-2 is empty
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
someone else should take it on now?
Absolutely!
Actually, have you published you use to
drago01 wrote:
No because it would require updates to many core parts of the system.
It requires at the very least updates to:
* gobject-introspection (to a version not binary-compatible with the one in
F14, so ALL packages with introspection info would have to be rebuilt, too)
* glib2 (which
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:44, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
someone else should take
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:52 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:44, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Question is, is it
Compose started at Thu Apr 7 13:15:58 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
On 04/06/2011 09:46 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
- I've made an oct2spec packaging script, package submission is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692257
Built and updates submitted for F14 and F15.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical
Dne 6.4.2011 15:35, Tim Niemueller napsal(a):
Be careful what you wish for, I ended up becoming the maintainer of
lua-xmlrpc when filing patches ;-)
OK, so I will be careful and ask somebody else to package lua-dbi (from
http://code.google.com/p/luadbi/downloads/list). It is new dependency of
So I think I'll stick with the current development build that is in F14
until F15 is finalized and released. Then I'll just upgrade I think.
It's seriously not worth the mucking around trying to get it running in a
F14 environment. It's just not worth my time and effort when F15 is really
not that
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
hi guys,
This is Yuguang Wang from Red Hat Beijing QE Team.
I'm currently working on nitrate, a test case management system.
It's an open-source project and is available here:
https://fedorahosted.org/nitrate
I'm trying to make this project a Fedora Approved Package, following
is the review
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MDV-Packdrakeng:
8dc16111304c486557ec94e26e8fa86c MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1a6183b8d2106df6dc5c0fd299face014c7c8607
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Apr 7 08:28:48 2011 +0200
Initial push.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MDV-Packdrakeng.spec | 49 +
sources |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671389
Bug 671389 depends on bug 675963, which changed state.
Bug 675963 Summary: Review Request: perl-MDV-Packdrakeng - Simple
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::System)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(AptPkg::Version)
perl-Config-Model-1.235-1.fc16.noarch requires
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630644
Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Browser-Open:
c516579203540861a6f5fc7b1876d56c Browser-Open-0.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4f979f79ac7b4989942d68e634bbe3e78439a491
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Apr 8 05:01:40 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#680593)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Browser-Open.spec | 60
sources|
Summary of changes:
4f979f7... initial import (rhbz#680593) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4f979f7... initial import (rhbz#680593) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4f979f7... initial import (rhbz#680593) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla:
c5d09d87540c28fc9ec8bd6da7861645 Dist-Zilla-4.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 702534051d20afc5a8e5ffecaa30b66aef33e39a
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Apr 8 05:29:49 2011 +0200
explicitly declare undetected requires
perl-Config-MVP.spec | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-MVP.spec
Summary of changes:
28c963e... Import. (*)
5ea9394... Add R: perl(Test::Deep) and R: perl(Test::Exception). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
28c963e... Import. (*)
5ea9394... Add R: perl(Test::Deep) and R: perl(Test::Exception). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 3efa2cd91cf72c3d9e9f8f1971e614982c86c3e9
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 8 07:26:36 2011 +0200
Add optional testsuite requirement perl(CHI).
perl-HTML-Mason.spec |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
51 matches
Mail list logo
