The license has changed to GPLv2+ (from GPLv2). Unlike boswars itself, the
upstream notice and copyright notices in the data both say version 2 or later,
so I am marking the package that way in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Tue May 31 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libvomsapi.so.0
CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libvomsapi.so.0()(64bit)
On 05/28/2011 08:11 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
the key is that we don't test any kind of real-world configuration, with
anything other than default apps, actual user data in place and so on.
And it shows. :-( My user account has been through many upgrades, and I've
I am co-maintaining boswars-addons which has been setup to not use dist
as part of the versions, since the package is noarch and the same build
is usable accross releases. It's 48 MB, so it has been considered large
enough to be worth not triggering updates when updating between Fedora
releases.
On 05/27/2011 08:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
So, can we have updates included for upgrades then? (IMHO, this should be
the default, or even better, required. Upgrading without updates enabled
just won't work reliably.)
We'd certainly be willing to entertain a patch to enable the repo in cases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2011 04:52 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
I'm experimenting with a package that needs to have rsyslog write to a
named fifo pipe (so log data can be handed off from rsyslog to an
external program). As I see it the options are:
1) apologize to
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:17 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
rasterview-1.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit)
rasterview-1.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit)
Fixed.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-05-31
11:01:02 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
The following packages will be affected:
djmount-0:0.71-3.fc15.i686
gmediaserver-0:0.13.0-7.fc15.i686
gmyth-0:0.7.1-14.fc15.i686
linux-igd-0:1.0-10.fc15.i686
ushare-0:1.1a-7.fc15.i686
and possibly more in third-party repos. I'll handle rebuilds for the
above, I don't expect any will need more
Greetings!
As previously announced, the town hall for the Fedora Engineering
Steering Committee (FESCo) is today, May 31, 2011.
The town hall will be taking place at 1800 UTC (2pm US-Eastern).
For information on how to participate, please see:
Hi,
we're going to import KDE Platform 4.7 to Rawhide soon but as upstream
reorganized tarballs, it's going to be a little bit more difficult (it's mess!)
and it means Rawhide is going to broken for a couple of days.
We were considering own build target but it's not going to be hopefully so
I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
DSDP: Software for semidefinite programming
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nspr-4.8.8-1.fc14,nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-softokn-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-3.12.10-1.fc14
Thanks in advance
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
DSDP: Software for semidefinite programming
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
I'm
Hi,
What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted?
I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write
the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't
appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong...
What do you think?
Thanks
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
same ideas in this thread,
On 5/31/11 11:23 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
gmyth-0:0.7.1-14.fc15.i686
linux-igd-0:1.0-10.fc15.i686
djmount-0:0.71-3.fc15.i686
Rebuilds done.
gmediaserver-0:0.13.0-7.fc15.i686
ushare-0:1.1a-7.fc15.i686
Coming eventually. Apparently libupnp decided to rewrite an entire API
surface between
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668513
Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
Hey, folks. If you follow the trac ticket notifications on test@ you may
have noticed this already, but I know it's easy to tune those out, and
I'm CCing devel@ so people following that list know about this too.
We're planning a Fedora IPv6 Test Day to coincide with World IPv6 Day on
June 8. This
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:07:32 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Peter Vrabec pvra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 05:25:44 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a new package to do an update on another package I maintain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819
DSDP: Software for
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:16:02AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:24:08AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
As I understand it, the best way
I will be pushing GeOS 3.3.0 to buildroots in the next 24 hours. I will
also rebuild PostGIS. If you have a package that depends on GeOS, you
might want to work on it, since there are bunch of API changes.
Changelog is here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/browser/tags/3.3.0/NEWS
Regards,
--
Devrim
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Params-Validate:
218b0e970b3568eeddf83f65b24657f6 Params-Validate-0.99.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 08a78023b8eab4f154e0423bdc6b74b1936248e3
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue May 31 08:38:23 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Rebase patch (Params-Validate-0.99.diff).
.gitignore|3 +--
Params-Validate-0.98.diff | 22
Summary of changes:
08a7802... Upstream update. Rebase patch (Params-Validate-0.99.diff). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
08a7802... Upstream update. Rebase patch (Params-Validate-0.99.diff). (*)
91e9c29... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f15' into f14
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 91e9c29ea2d90e6702232a97afaedb9e9160df0e
Merge: 2bdd6bc 08a7802
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue May 31 09:00:03 2011 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f15' into f14
.gitignore|3 +--
Params-Validate-0.98.diff | 22
commit 5fa05909e9e1029012ba9d08dca690c2fffd7046
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 31 09:48:56 2011 +0200
Initial push.
perl-IO-Stty.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Stty.spec b/perl-IO-Stty.spec
index
Summary of changes:
5fa0590... Initial push. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite provides bogus perl(LWP::Protocol)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite provides bogus perl(LWP::Protocol)
commit 704532a459c6d5b012c28d1aa9de1c456f6fd615
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 31 11:21:35 2011 +0200
Do not provide LWP::Protocol (#709269)
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
Summary of changes:
704532a... Do not provide LWP::Protocol (#709269) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
704532a... Do not provide LWP::Protocol (#709269) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
--- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-05-31 05:30:06 EDT ---
Indeed this was a mistake.
0.712-5 filters this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-31
05:32:12 EDT ---
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-5.fc14 has
Summary of changes:
b51f51b... - Upstream update. - Spec overhaul. - Add %bcond_with relea (*)
f853d4b... - Upstream update. (*)
be14686... - Upstream update. (*)
10f5fb4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
e212307... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit
commit 5dcf3da87973820cc24c3bac076fe5079cfe4188
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 31 11:21:35 2011 +0200
Do not provide LWP::Protocol (#709269)
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
commit 25f5fc9a80e95a4a1fdebf7419bb745e1fbc5b6b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue May 31 12:00:44 2011 +0100
Clean buildroot
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec b/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
index
commit a6599bec519210bd679599b41bc2d0e29fbede6c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue May 31 12:21:25 2011 +0100
Filter out bogus provides in a way that works with EPEL 6
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit e26b07a0f51008f536c6e44ec2791ab0f78d65b3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue May 31 12:10:31 2011 +0100
BR: perl(Test::Differences), perl(Test::MockObject)
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 881a60b7349febff8b5cd6a0536033daf1a84da1
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue May 31 12:24:46 2011 +0100
Fix .gitignore
.gitignore |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 65a93fc..a497101 100644
---
The lightweight tag 'perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-5.el5' was created pointing to:
881a60b... Fix .gitignore
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-31
07:52:39 EDT ---
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-5.el5 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637077
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-05-31
08:43:05 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that
47 matches
Mail list logo
