On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 03:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com writes:
As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat
llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even
on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:23 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 15:56:49 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd certainly second Robyn's thanks to all the awesome folks on the
devel, releng and QA teams who worked so hard to get this thing done and
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:01 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the
same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm,
glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and
Anybody coming over to Mozilla Asia Camp? ..
https://wiki.mozilla.org/AsiaCamp2011
I know at least 2 are coming. If theres a number probably I can work
out a small FAD/Meetup sometime before/between/after the event.
Regards
--
Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail / KageSenshi
Inigo Consulting
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
That's really a policy decision for the GNOME / Fedora desktop teams,
not for ajax.
Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, so I asked.
But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
hardware that
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 06:23 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
That's really a policy decision for the GNOME / Fedora desktop teams,
not for ajax.
Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, so I asked.
No more than anyone -
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know, so I
asked.
No more than anyone - there really is no cabal ;) All I know is what the
GNOME / desktop team have said in public, but what they've said seems to
point in a
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:21:08 + (UTC) JB wrote:
http://pastebin.com/QsD9LDxb
This log shows no excessive delay during shutdown.
systemd was asked to power off here:
[ 979.583227] systemd[1]: Got D-Bus request:
org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager.StartUnit() on /org/freedesktop/systemd1
[
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:39:25 + (UTC) JB wrote:
I see these NetworkManager activities that are repeated and seem to be
identical (if this is a problem, then systemd or NetworkManager
related ?):
That looks like some kind of a logging oddity, where the same messages
reach the kmsg buffer
Dne 2.11.2011 19:06, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
As noted on IRC, but repeated here for the rest of the class, I've
been buried in the work necessary to convert the internal Red Hat
repos from cvs to git, much like we did in Fedora. This required
some changes to fedpkg, particularly moving most
Compose started at Fri Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
commit 1d66843d905bfe13532d7ce080d8deae5d96ff0b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Nov 4 13:09:48 2011 +
Update to 4.056
- Update to 4.056
- In InetBase.pm v0.04:
- Improve inet_aton to overcome broken gethostbyname found in NetBSD and
Am 30.10.2011 23:02, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 24.10.11 13:05, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
Here's an attempt to summarize the rationale for merging /bin, /sbin,
/usr/sbin into /usr/bin with different words collecting the various points
raised:
a) the split between
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 + (UTC)
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know,
so I asked.
No more than anyone - there really is no cabal ;) All I know is
what the
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
hardware that previously needed the fallback mode is covered, fallback
mode will die. AIUI, fallback mode isn't meant to be a GNOME
2-by-stealth for Shell
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
hardware that previously needed the fallback mode is covered, fallback
mode will die. AIUI,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:09:12 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 03:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
hardware that previously needed the fallback mode is covered, fallback
mode will
On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 + (UTC)
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know,
so I asked.
No more
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 14:58:47 +0100,
Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
One nice outcome is that we could end up with an optimized reference
s/w renderer (and kernel/user land stack) for all platforms. Which is
cool! :)
The other graphics related improvement looking possible for
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:10:57 +
Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 + (UTC)
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
Yeah, I got
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 14:10 +, Ian Malone wrote:
It's frustrating to be stuck on
overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing
/something/ but you don't know what. If it worked fluidly it would be
okay. Actually, the responsiveness issue isn't limited just to
overview,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 + (UTC)
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com writes:
Yeah, I got that bit.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
It'd be great if we can work with the anaconda team closely to try and
get involved all along the line in the UI rewrite stuff, and see if that
can reduce the pressure around release times - let's put that on
Tell us again where to find that gnome shell for dummies doc?
I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so
non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I gave up after an hour and
switched to Forced Fallback Mode.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Tell us again where to find that gnome shell for dummies doc?
The cheat sheet? http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/CheatSheet
I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so
non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I
JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
Michal Schmidt mschmidt at redhat.com writes:
...
Show us the shutdown-log.txt.
...
Here you go:
http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8
JB
This is related to selinux:
...
[ 17.701301] sandbox[868]: Starting sandbox/etc/rc.d/init.d/sandbox: line
JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
Michal Schmidt mschmidt at redhat.com writes:
...
Show us the shutdown-log.txt.
...
Here you go:
http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8
JB
I see these NetworkManager activities that are
Michal Schmidt mschmidt at redhat.com writes:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:21:08 + (UTC) JB wrote:
http://pastebin.com/QsD9LDxb
This log shows no excessive delay during shutdown.
...
Are you sure the long delay occured in the test this log is from?
Michal
I claimed that the 2 min
it seems there is a bug but i can not figure out in which component
if i try to connect with the full-qualified hostname it says
name or service not known, without the domain it works because
it is in resolv.conf
this does not affect ssh, seems to be global
the following apache-reverse-proxy too
Greetings and salutations,
It is time for yet another edition of Robyn's Fedora Public Service
Announcements :)
I'd like to give you a friendly reminder that the nomination period for
the upcoming Fedora elections will be closing promptly TOMORROW,
Saturday, November 5, 2011, at 23:59:59
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net writes:
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ssh root@centos.vmware.local
ssh: Could not resolve hostname centos.vmware.local: Name or service not known
.local is reserved for MDNS.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D
On Fri, 04.11.11 15:28, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ssh root@centos.vmware.local
ssh: Could not resolve hostname centos.vmware.local: Name or service not known
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ nslookup centos.vmware.local
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:
Am 04.11.2011 16:37, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 04.11.11 15:28, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ssh root@centos.vmware.local
ssh: Could not resolve hostname centos.vmware.local: Name or service not
known
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ nslookup
Hi,
I just installed F16 RC5 in a VM and I see the GNOME (foot) logo
in the gdm login window, i.s.o. the Fedora logo. Is this correct?
IIRC the Fedora logo was still there in an earlier beta...
--
--Jos Vos j...@xos.nl
--X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
--
On 4 November 2011 14:36, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on
overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing
/something/ but you don't know what.
On Fri, 04.11.11 17:06, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Note that .local is the mDNS ad-hoc domain as implemented by Avahi,
Bonjour/MacOS, and a lot of hardware
this domain name was used / selected LONG before avahi was a topic
Well, believe me, there's no point in bitching
On 11/04/2011 05:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.11.2011 16:37, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
nslookup will only work for unicast DNS names, and hence will bypass any
mDNS lookups.
as you see nslookup does not bypass, it resolves
so what component and how to tell leave my configuration in
Just a thank you for allowing me to uncheck 'Use LVM'. Much simpler than
custom partitioning but still gets me what I need/wanted to use.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2011 02:34 AM, JB wrote:
JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
Michal Schmidt mschmidt at redhat.com writes:
... Show us the shutdown-log.txt.
...
Here you go:
http://pastebin.com/EHTiuiR8
JB
This is related to selinux:
Hi all,
I have a question to package maintainers.
I'm the upstream developer of PicoLisp, and would like to see it
included in the Fedora wishlist. Currently, PicoLisp is available in
OpenWRT and the Debian family of distributions.
Is anybody interested to maintain it as a package in Fedora? If
Am 04.11.2011 17:29, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Well, believe me, there's no point in bitching here about Avahi. I
didn't make the choice that .local was the mDNS domain. Apple did.
well, everytime i come in contact with anything from apple i could throw
something out of the window beginning
I have been looking into replacing Fedora's obsolete version of libpng
(1.2.x release series) with something more modern. The possible choices
are the 1.4.x and 1.5.x release series. The 1.5.x series adds some more
features that 1.4.x did not have, but it also poses significantly more
migration
On 11/04/2011 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, everytime i come in contact with anything from apple i could throw
something out of the window beginning with the systemctl ACTION service
instead systemctl SERVICE action while i laughed over years about apples
order of this in their
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
forwarding the bugs you're too lazy to file directly at the right place.
Kevin Kofler
--
seth vidal wrote:
Bojan,
Install xfce. You'll be happy w/that.
You should also give KDE Plasma Desktop a try.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:23:02PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
forwarding the bugs you're too lazy
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
forwarding the bugs
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:23:02PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not
--- Original message ---
From: seth vidal
Install xfce. You'll be happy w/that.
Thanks for the tip.
Or maybe I'll just have to find time to (learn how to) hack the shell,
remove overview from it, bring back the taskbar and workspaces to normal
view and call it
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:37:33 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
Yeah, agreed. I don't think there's any especial need for the
go/no-go to be an entire day ahead of the release
...snip...
Excellent background and detective work! Kudos!
Some quick questions:
Whats upstreams schedule like? How long will 1.4 and 1.5 continue to be
supported, and when do they plan on a 1.6?
Is there possibly a way to switch to 1.4, but warn (buildtime) about
this going away soon, etc?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Shipping bug-free software is the job of maintainers. It's reasonable to
ask a reporter to take an issue upstream if you feel that that'll result
in the bug being fixed faster, but there's no reason to mandate that and
Once upon a time, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com said:
Any opinions on which way to jump?
How hard is it to fix source that accesses the fields directly? Do all
the fields that were previously exposed have direct accessor functions?
If that's the case, it should be straight-forward (although time
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 10:17 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Shipping bug-free software is the job of maintainers. It's reasonable to
ask a reporter to take an issue upstream if you feel that that'll result
in the bug
...snip...
Just another datapoint, my personal policy here is:
a) ask the reporter if they could report it upstream, as they will be
able to answer questions and advocate for their bug much better that I
can in some cases.
b) If they say no, and I agree it's a bug/issue that should be
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 09:37 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
It'd be great if we can work with the anaconda team closely to try and
get involved all along the line in the UI rewrite stuff, and see if that
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
Some quick questions:
Whats upstreams schedule like? How long will 1.4 and 1.5 continue to be
supported, and when do they plan on a 1.6?
1.4 will be supported for a long time, though presumably not as long as
1.5. I don't think there are any active plans
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either
allows moving the Go / No-Go meeting when appropriate or just
schedule it closer to the readiness meeting.
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:54:28 -0400
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
Some quick questions:
Whats upstreams schedule like? How long will 1.4 and 1.5 continue
to be supported, and when do they plan on a 1.6?
1.4 will be supported for a long time,
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:55:00 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either
allows moving the Go /
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net writes:
Once upon a time, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com said:
Any opinions on which way to jump?
How hard is it to fix source that accesses the fields directly? Do all
the fields that were previously exposed have direct accessor functions?
AFAIK, they all do, and
fre 2011-11-04 klockan 13:12 -0400 skrev Tom Lane:
Packages that rebuilt successfully with 1.5 658
Packages that FTBFS for non-libpng reasons186
Packages that rebuilt with 1.4, but not 1.5 74
Packages that need help even with 1.4 46
With this data my gut feeling is to go for
Jos Vos (j...@xos.nl) said:
I just installed F16 RC5 in a VM and I see the GNOME (foot) logo
in the gdm login window, i.s.o. the Fedora logo. Is this correct?
IIRC the Fedora logo was still there in an earlier beta...
This is the fallback GDM, correct?
Bill
--
devel mailing list
On 4 November 2011 13:06, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:55:00 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the
documentation. I'd just like to
On 13:12 Fri 04 Nov , Tom Lane wrote:
I have been looking into replacing Fedora's obsolete version of libpng
(1.2.x release series) with something more modern. The possible choices
are the 1.4.x and 1.5.x release series. The 1.5.x series adds some more
features that 1.4.x did not have,
On 10/26/11 12:32 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682
I've made another attempt to reach out the the glibc maintainer
directly again this morning to hopefully answer the questions
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:10:10PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is the fallback GDM, correct?
Yes it is (in a KVM console). I now realize that it looks different
from the GDM I saw when I tested an earlier beta on a real PC.
--
--Jos Vos j...@xos.nl
--X/OS Experts in Open
Dr Andrew John Hughes ahug...@redhat.com writes:
FYI, Gentoo already went to libpng 1.5 and so have patches floating around
for a lot of stuff that breaks.
Oh, thanks, that's very useful to know! I think the availability of
such patches should substantially reduce the pain involved.
Given
fre 2011-11-04 klockan 11:53 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi:
If we do this, next cycle we should NOT do any 'two part' go/no-go
meetings.
The two part meetings were both about critical blockers that were
known and actively being worked on at the time of the meeting. This
situation will happen no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Jos Vos (j...@xos.nl) said:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:10:10PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is the fallback GDM, correct?
Yes it is (in a KVM console). I now realize that it looks different
from the GDM I saw when I tested an earlier beta on a real PC.
This is a result of fixing
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
FYI, Gentoo already went to libpng 1.5 and so have patches floating around
for a lot of stuff that breaks.
from a _quick_ search:
http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=libpngbaseproject=openSUSE%3AFactorylang=enexclude_debug=true
suse1.4.x/1.2.x stable
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Whats upstreams schedule like? How long will 1.4 and 1.5 continue to be
supported, and when do they plan on a 1.6?
forever :-?
See http://libpng.sf.net/
UPDATE 2 November 2011: The latest released version is libpng-1.5.6 [DOWNLOAD].
* For legacy applications,
Henrik Nordström wrote:
Documentaiton on how to adopt application code to work properly with
libpng 1.4+ is readily available.
Some notes from upstream: http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html
==cut==
Portability Note
The libpng 1.5.x series continues the evolution of the libpng API,
On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
forwarding the bugs you're too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
yesterday in the afternoon the xfce-weather-plugin suddenly stopped
working and allways displays No Data. Trying to switch my location
or update my fedora 16 against updates-testing also didn't solve that
problem.
Is it just me or a general
Ian Malone ibmalone at gmail.com writes:
This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on
overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing
/something/ but you don't know what. If it worked fluidly it would be
okay.
For me, it goes further than that. I do not want
On 11/04/2011 05:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work
Once upon a time, Heiko Adams fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de said:
yesterday in the afternoon the xfce-weather-plugin suddenly stopped
working and allways displays No Data. Trying to switch my location
or update my fedora 16 against updates-testing also didn't solve that
problem.
Does it use
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 21:06 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
fre 2011-11-04 klockan 11:53 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi:
If we do this, next cycle we should NOT do any 'two part' go/no-go
meetings.
The two part meetings were both about critical blockers that were
known and actively being
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP:
eda64e32db45bea44e538a46842baca7 NetAddr-IP-4.056.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741777
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
84 matches
Mail list logo
