Dear All
I was trying to setup nfs server on fedora 16 and first off all started from
nfs-server. I checked
chkconfig - nothing, then systemctl --all | grep nfs - nothing again. Then
I searched in rpm -q
nfs-utils -l and found out that I have it:
/lib/systemd/system/nfs-blkmap.service
Hi Kalpa and Buddhika,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm willing to package PicoLisp. Any assistance is highly appreciated.
Great! I'm glad to hear that
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:49:15PM +0530, Buddhika Kurera wrote:
But I would like to learn
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 11:58 +0400, Lucas wrote:
Dear All
I was trying to setup nfs server on fedora 16 and first off all started from
nfs-server. I checked
chkconfig - nothing, then systemctl --all | grep nfs - nothing again.
Then I searched in rpm -q
nfs-utils -l and found out that I
Thanks.
I totally forgot about that difference. There is loaded, dead, ... and disabled.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:35:21 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:07:44 -0400, TL (Tom) wrote:
My list was just the result of repoquery --whatrequires.
The last Rawhide build of geeqie also doesn't depend on libpng*.
F-15 does, however, which might be where you've run
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:
I, for
one, want my computer to work the way I learned and interiorized a computer
works, any innovative interface destroys my automatisms and confuses me.
I'm using
Compose started at Sun Nov 6 08:16:08 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15
On 11/06/2011 12:26 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Puzzles me. The F-16 build doesn't depend on libpng* directly:
$ rpm -qR geeqie|grep png
$ rpm -q geeqie
geeqie-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64
I noticed a similar thing with gkrellm-volume -- the F-15 build did have
a dependency on it, but the F-16 one
drago01 drago01 at gmail.com writes:
Not true ... I recommend reading
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
I read that a long, long time ago, of course. In fact, I have written a
constructive critique of Gnome 3 many months ago, based to a large degree on the
very
drago01 drago01 at gmail.com writes:
Not true ... I recommend reading
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
Just one link, so you wouldn't say I'm plucking things out of thin air:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/FAQ#Why_no_window_list_or_dock.3F
This
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
drago01 drago01 at gmail.com writes:
Not true ... I recommend reading
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/#Activities_Overview
Just one link, so you wouldn't say I'm plucking things out of thin air:
On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:42 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
The existence of all those extensions that bring back sanity (apps menu in
normal view, workspaces in normal view, persistent dash for switching tasks in
normal view etc.) is the proof of the ultimate irony - the (supposedly)
biggest
Florian Müllner fmuellner at gnome.org writes:
Rebuttal only here. No new material.
Does that mean that the existence of terminal emulators for X11 is proof
of graphical user interfaces being a mistake?
Terminal and (I guess other) GUI apps do entirely _different_ things. Apps menu
in
drago01 drago01 at gmail.com writes:
Again, rebuttal only.
I didn't comment on whether your arguments are valid or not I simply
said that confused users was *not* the reason for the lack of
taskbar. distraction != confusion.
Now we're splitting hairs, eh? A distracted user is not a confused
On 11/07/2011 07:33 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
The name of one user that
was tempted to switch tasks just because the taskbar/workspace switcher
me! I'd click to see what was 'happening' on the other workspace.
Fred
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Frederic Muller fred at cm17.com writes:
me! I'd click to see what was 'happening' on the other workspace.
:-)
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:23:02 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
different bugzilla accounts by now.
So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
forwarding the bugs you're too lazy
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:25 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
I did not imply that users that use gnome-shell as is are insane. What I said
was that GUI behaviour that introduces many _unnecessary_ steps for _no_
_benefit_ is insane.
Did you even read my answer to you earlier where I said that I was
Mathieu Bridon bochecha at fedoraproject.org writes:
instead of complaining and being insulting?
Point to one insult please.
Constructive criticism is not complaining.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:33 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Please, just give me the name of _one_ user that got _distracted_ by the
taskbar in Gnome (or any other OS, for that matter).
Look at the value of the « From: » header of this email for a name of
such a user.
The name of one user that
Mathieu Bridon bochecha at fedoraproject.org writes:
[..snip..] and thanks to my incredibly poor focus [..snip..]
Oh, and I don't think I am a Joe Average or an Aunt Tillie: I'm a
Fedora package maintainer, Python developer, a release engineer for an
in-house Linux distribution at $dayjob,
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 03:24 +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Mathieu Bridon bochecha at fedoraproject.org writes:
[..snip..] and thanks to my incredibly poor focus [..snip..]
Oh, and I don't think I am a Joe Average or an Aunt Tillie: I'm a
Fedora package maintainer, Python developer, a
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
It's meeting time again! It's the first meeting of the post-Fedora 16
era, so time to dust off anything you've been sitting on through the
release crunch. Also note that clocks went back in North America today,
Hey, everyone. There are pending updates for livecd-tools in F14, F15
and F16:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15442
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15374
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15386
It's quite important that we get these
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-Natural:
a081295bcb2eb5a94c608b6c13174cc2 DateTime-Format-Natural-0.98.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 400129969919e7cdb81e1e53d528fac02f4c9c78
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Nov 6 10:13:27 2011 +0100
update to 1.05
.gitignore|1 +
mojomojo.spec | 36 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14
commit 76ce67404487ce04f21ffbd8cfb621019b848dbc
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Nov 6 10:13:14 2011 +0100
update to 0.98
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
76ce674... update to 0.98 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
76ce674... update to 0.98 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
76ce674... update to 0.98 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Declare:
3cd720eb4ac3c8e4561b592f759bce8f Devel-Declare-0.006008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-PrereqScanner:
566ec983be467da38a5ca257150afb7f Perl-PrereqScanner-1.008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 57848ae5d4f2fa7d802ec4b78eecaaff419fcf19
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Nov 6 10:59:42 2011 +0100
update to 1.008
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-PrereqScanner.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
00e24f0... update to 1.007 (*)
57848ae... update to 1.008 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
00e24f0... update to 1.007 (*)
57848ae... update to 1.008 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
00e24f0... update to 1.007 (*)
57848ae... update to 1.008 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-indirect:
e346d70f99198478f8db246028bf3257 indirect-0.26.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748140
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742671
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751548
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751549
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
43 matches
Mail list logo
