Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 11/10/2011 06:43 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any >> given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for >> libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x8

Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread Kushal Das
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:04 AM, seth vidal wrote: > repoquery can do it, too. > > what kind of code would be calling this? It will be some python code, the idea is one can ask a webservice for the download url with a package name and webservice will return the download url for that package.

Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread seth vidal
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:11:08 +0530 Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any > given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for > libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64 . The user may not be on a > Fedora 15 box. I saw yu

Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any > given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for > libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64 . The user may not be on a > Fedora 15 box. I saw

Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread Aditya Patawari
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any > given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for > libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64 . The user may not be on a > Fedora 15 box. I saw yumd

How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?

2011-11-09 Thread Kushal Das
Hi all, I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64 . The user may not be on a Fedora 15 box. I saw yumdownloader --urls option. Any pointers ? Kushal -- http://fedo

Re: Why does git merge have so much trouble with Fedora package branches?

2011-11-09 Thread Matt Domsch
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:46:57PM -0600, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's rather infuriating to have to go in and 'fix' a bunch of > 'conflicts' which are not conflicts at all, but just the changes you > wanted to merge with a bunch of silly and around them. I use this: fedpkg switch-bran

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Now taking a quick look at the autofs service which I assume you are > referring too I'm not seeing anykind of massive rewrite in order for the > daemon ( which generally is an exception that a rule ) to work in > systemd uni

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > >>What other form of encouragement can you suggest? > > This email thread for a start. > > We have had email threads like this for two release cycles now and yet > the main problem st

Re: Why does git merge have so much trouble with Fedora package branches?

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:29 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:20 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 17:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I'm currently going through and bumping several packages whose Rawhide > > > builds have got behind their F16 builds. >

Re: Why does git merge have so much trouble with Fedora package branches?

2011-11-09 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:20 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 17:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm currently going through and bumping several packages whose Rawhide > > builds have got behind their F16 builds. > > > > I've come across several packages where git merge hit 'co

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 12:07 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > 2011/11/9 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > That only leaves this relevant sections from that quick look that needs > > some work and remains questionable if that should be handled in unit > > file et

Re: Why does git merge have so much trouble with Fedora package branches?

2011-11-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 17:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm currently going through and bumping several packages whose Rawhide > builds have got behind their F16 builds. > > I've come across several packages where git merge hit 'conflicts' for no > readily apparently reason in this case. I ha

Why does git merge have so much trouble with Fedora package branches?

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Williamson
I'm currently going through and bumping several packages whose Rawhide builds have got behind their F16 builds. I've come across several packages where git merge hit 'conflicts' for no readily apparently reason in this case. Take the current state of gnome-power-manager. Master is at: commit dfd

Specifying arch in comps/yumgroups.xml

2011-11-09 Thread Theodore Papadopoulo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm playing with comps to install software. I'm mostly in an x86-64 environment, but for compatibility I need some i386 packages... but those seem to be invisible and I find no syntax that make them visible... And there seems to be no erro

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2011 10:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't know if that broke in Alpha/Beta, but it's always been this way > on past live media. Perhaps we should revisit it thought... enable it, > but make sure premitemptypasswords is set for sshd (which it should be > by default). Or disable it on the

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't know if that broke in Alpha/Beta, but it's always been this way > on past live media. Perhaps we should revisit it thought... enable it, > but make sure premitemptypasswords is set for sshd (which it should be > by default). I personally don't mind it being off by defa

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:44:34 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > From my perspective it's quite the oposit as in having it enabled on > > the dvd and instantly letting novice end users be vulnerable to ssh > > attacks because apparently power users no longer posses the >

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating writes: > On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 >> This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds fine on my >> workstation under mock's fedora-

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Andre Robatino wrote: > After doing an install to hard drive from a F16 live image, I had to run > system-config-firewall, then save settings by unchecking and rechecking the > SSH > box (which was already checked, same as install from install images) and > clicking Apply. This caused an SSH iptab

RELEASE: Mach 1.0.0 'Madera'

2011-11-09 Thread thomas
This mail announces the release of Mach 1.0.0 'Madera'. mach allows you to set up clean roots from scratch for any distribution or distribution variation supported. Currently, this is limited to RPM-based distributions. This clean build root can be used for making clean packages, running jailed

openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Andre Robatino
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY redhat.com> writes: > IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was > enabled and run. > > I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though > openssh-server was installed, it was both not enabled and therefor not > run when the install

Re: anaconda poor error handling

2011-11-09 Thread Chris Lumens
> Just tried (and failed) update f15->f16. Using dvd (most reliable method). > > Went fine until I hit an error, trying to update ipython. At this point, > anaconda just quit. No hints given what the issue was. No offer to try to > report the error. > > It mentioned that it _might_ be cause

Re: anaconda poor error handling

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Neal Becker wrote: > Just tried (and failed) update f15->f16. Using dvd (most reliable > method). IMHO (and this is NOT the official Fedora Project recommendation): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum is the most reliable method. Anaconda keeps having issues like yours.

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > From my perspective it's quite the oposit as in having it enabled on > the dvd and instantly letting novice end users be vulnerable to ssh > attacks because apparently power users no longer posses the knowledge on > how to enable it via kickstart or otherwize > >

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:17:05PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/09/2011 06:59 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > Seems surprising (to me) that it'd be installed, and the port open in > > the firewall, but not enabled. > > From my perspective it's quite the oposit as in having it en

libguestfs 1.14 update for Fedora 16

2011-11-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I would like to put libguestfs 1.14 (the next stable branch) into Fedora 16. There should be no changes required in other packages at all, since libguestfs is API and ABI compatible for all releases, forever. Nor should users know the difference (except new features). But it's software, and we

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 > This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds fine on my > workstation under mock's fedora-rawhide-x86_64 and fedora-

[Bug 751751] perl-IO-Socket-SSL failing to return last line of data

2011-11-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751751 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-11-09 16:26:22 EST --- perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.49-1.fc16 has been submitted as an up

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.49-1.fc16

2011-11-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.49-1.fc16' was created pointing to: edb47ab... Update to 1.49 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > If yours cant be autoloaded on use here's a conf file that loads that > module. > > ### autofs.conf ### > > # Load autofs module at boot > autofs4 Isn't loading autofs one of the first things systemd does anyway, because it's used to implement systemd's on-access

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL/f16] (4 commits) ...Update to 1.49

2011-11-09 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: a5d7b7b... Update to 1.46 (*) 771cc6e... Update to 1.47 (*) fa11cf0... Update to 1.48 (*) edb47ab... Update to 1.49 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
John5342 wrote: > I don't know if you noticed but that bug shows it isn't and never has > been assigned to anybody so it is not entirely impossible nobody has > actually seen it... Well, that's a failure of upstream's process then. Somebody has to look at incoming bug reports, you cannot treat yo

F17 heads up: X server git snapshots

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Jackson
nsion-6) = 0 xserver-abi(videodrv-11) = 0 xserver-abi(xinput-13) = 0 But git snapshots will look like: $ rpm -qp --provides xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.11.99.1-1.2009.fc17.x86_64.rpm | grep abi xserver-abi(ansic-2009) = 0 xserver-abi(extension-2009) = 0 xserver-abi(videodrv-2009) =

Re: Review beg (netcdf libs)

2011-11-09 Thread Jef Spaleta
Yikes. I'll try real real hard to do this tonight after I get home if noone beats me to it. -jef On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Not sure I have time to do a swap, but I need the following reviews done: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742605 - netcdf-cxx

Review beg (netcdf libs)

2011-11-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
Not sure I have time to do a swap, but I need the following reviews done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742605 - netcdf-cxx4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742610 - netcdf-cxx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744334 - netcdf-fortran Especially the latter two.

[bucardo] - new version 4.4.7

2011-11-09 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
commit 859278996764e7edb54e25caaa9cd391c77b6609 Author: Itamar Date: Wed Nov 9 17:53:20 2011 -0200 - new version 4.4.7 .gitignore |1 + Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc |6 ++ bucardo.spec |5 - sources |3 +-- 4 files changed, 12

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-09 Thread Jesse Keating
On Nov 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > [ajax@f17 fedora]$ fedpkg co xorg-x11-server > Could not execute clone: must be type, not classobj > [ajax@f17 fedora]$ rpm -q fedpkg > fedpkg-1.5-1.fc17.noarch whoops. Looks like I screwed up the alias somehow. For now, use clone instead of

File Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp

2011-11-09 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: 38a142cb48a2786c572082b9b5a9099b Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz.asc -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

File Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by itamarjp

2011-11-09 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for bucardo: 9192165d68856139b0fd605971f599a5 Bucardo-4.4.7.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: I am running a rather locked down environment

2011-11-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2011 06:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Meaning this is a tool that can be used by bluetooth devices to off load > data off my desktop. I don't want to allow any random telephone that > gets near my laptop to be able to attempt to remove data from my computer. Now now be a sport this fina

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2011 06:59 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Seems surprising (to me) that it'd be installed, and the port open in > the firewall, but not enabled. From my perspective it's quite the oposit as in having it enabled on the dvd and instantly letting novice end users be vulnerable to ssh atta

Re: Proposing Fedora Feature for private /tmp and /var/tmp for all systemd services in Fedora 17.

2011-11-09 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Miloslav Trmač said: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Benny Amorsen > wrote: > > How about making a non-world-writable directory somewhere for this > > purpose, with service-named directories beneath it? > > > > That is yet another thing for sysadms to learn about of course,

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 11/09/2011 08:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane  wrote: postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/09/2011 08:49 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 >>> This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 11/09/2011 11:15 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/09/2011 04:07 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was >> enabled and run. >> >> I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though >> openssh-server was installe

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Jim Meyering
Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 >> This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds fine on my >> workstation under mock's fedo

Re: Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 > This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds fine on my > workstation under mock's fedora-rawhide-x86_64 and fedo

I am running a rather locked down environment

2011-11-09 Thread Daniel J Walsh
I do not allow services to run on my desktop to listen on networks, using SELinux user staff_t in rawhide. A couple of weeks ago I noticed this AVC message. time->Wed Nov 9 22:29:26 2011 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1320895766.065:125): arch=c03e syscall=50 success=no exit=-13 a0=7 a1=1 a2=a a3

gnome-scan package status confusion

2011-11-09 Thread Michael Schwendt
Why is gnome-scan-0.6.2-7.fc15 offered in Fedora 16 when it has been retired months ago and is affected by serious crashers? The reports in bugzilla are without a reply from the assignee: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-scan Has it been retired without requesting rel-eng to block it from th

Re: Proposing Fedora Feature for private /tmp and /var/tmp for all systemd services in Fedora 17.

2011-11-09 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote: > How about making a non-world-writable directory somewhere for this > purpose, with service-named directories beneath it? > > That is yet another thing for sysadms to learn about of course, unless > it is placed in /tmp itself which creates so

Differences between koji and mock rawhide environments?

2011-11-09 Thread Tom Lane
postgresql is currently failing to rebuild in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3499379 This seems quite repeatable, in koji, but the package builds fine on my workstation under mock's fedora-rawhide-x86_64 and fedora-rawhide-i386 environments. Shouldn't this have exactly

anaconda poor error handling

2011-11-09 Thread Neal Becker
Just tried (and failed) update f15->f16. Using dvd (most reliable method). Went fine until I hit an error, trying to update ipython. At this point, anaconda just quit. No hints given what the issue was. No offer to try to report the error. It mentioned that it _might_ be caused by a problem

Re: New build of fedpkg (fedora-packager) coming to updates-testing / rawhide

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > Please test these updates and let me know if all is good, or if you > have other issues. Bodhi karma, email, IRC, smoke signal, just let me > know. [ajax@f17 fedora]$ fedpkg co xorg-x11-server Could not execute clone: must be type, not cl

Re: openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2011 04:07 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was > enabled and run. > > I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though > openssh-server was installed, it was both not enabled and therefor not > run when the ins

openssh-server in F16ga

2011-11-09 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was enabled and run. I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though openssh-server was installed, it was both not enabled and therefor not run when the install finished and after a reboot. It's possible that I

[perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit b2c3618f9a03fd7970bb13b8edab21a2d38e5db3 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 17:06:29 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon.spec b/perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon.spec index 6d

Re: rubygem macro error

2011-11-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Alex Dalitz wrote: (CC:ed Fedora-devel, we're trying to figure out the ruby bug with %3d ri-doc names) >> I tried using yours and i had to make some xoes for it to build. >> It used "ruby-gems" instead of "rubygems". The was a "=" -> "=3D" >> caused by one of our mail agents.

[perl-Gtk2-Spell] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 32ecf5b9ea81a7ee2916f4d379360691479789af Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 17:00:29 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gtk2-Spell.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Spell.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Spell.spec index 1423e62..

[perl-Gtk2-Sexy] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 0a3109218b80f188f2cf3c2153e5fdc6ea15e35b Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 16:58:56 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Sexy.spec index 4bf1e37..427

[perl-Gtk2-Notify] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 1780b6369ceff43fcd8f5d179e13f4a726d6c5c6 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 16:56:34 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec b/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec index 9baf4a8.

[perl-Gtk2-GladeXML] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 74618410189668da21509580a5b72f2d84eab62d Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 16:55:43 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gtk2-GladeXML.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-GladeXML.spec b/perl-Gtk2-GladeXML.spec index

[perl-Gnome2-Print] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit dcdfdceeb7832092f2a14ff94f9cc301e48937e6 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 16:49:04 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gnome2-Print.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec b/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec index 9f0

Re: Upgrading libpng: shall we move to 1.4.x or 1.5.x?

2011-11-09 Thread Tom Lane
Nils Philippsen writes: > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I plan to provide the 1.2.x libpng shared library (and only the library, >> not its devel support files) in a libpng-compat subpackage for the time >> being. > Any reason why the compat package ships the libpng-1.2.pc

[perl-Gnome2] Rebuild for libpng 1.5

2011-11-09 Thread Iain Arnell
commit d9438dc07cbb8cf3e1240fd73ace46accef0b128 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Nov 9 16:37:40 2011 +0100 Rebuild for libpng 1.5 perl-Gnome2.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gnome2.spec b/perl-Gnome2.spec index 1dda411..d51d3da 1006

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-09 Thread John5342
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:27, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Anything that directly or indirectly uses QtWebKit or QtScript also requires > execmem, unless we disable the JavaScript JIT, which we used to do, but got > users complaining about the slowness. > > See also: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cg

Re: F17 heads up: gnome-shell for everyone!

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Any time I go into a rawhide I enable the tightest controls. Then > relax them as we get closer to Beta. I am thinking of dropping > execmem protection from user apps altogether as I see almost all > applications that a user relies on needing execmem. The attached > regul

Re: Upgrading libpng: shall we move to 1.4.x or 1.5.x?

2011-11-09 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In either case, as per the discussion at > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-October/157712.html > I plan to provide the 1.2.x libpng shared library (and only the library, > not its devel support files) in a libpng-compat subpac

Re: Review(s) swap - sugar activities

2011-11-09 Thread Thibault North
On November 8, 2011 05:44:46 PM Brendan Jones wrote: > On 11/08/2011 09:29 PM, Thibault North wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On November 8, 2011 11:22:24 AM Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >> well, I'm kinda busy with exams at the uni and I'll be free again > >> after the first week of Dec

rawhide report: 20111109 changes

2011-11-09 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Nov 9 08:15:12 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 4ti2-1.3.2-7.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.15 1:anerley-0.3.0-5.fc17.i6

[Bug 752389] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5004 is available

2011-11-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752389 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Heads up: bumping libnl to v3 in rawhide/F17 soon

2011-11-09 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 11/09/2011 12:08 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 22:21 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >> On 11/08/2011 06:10 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The >>> libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want ve

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Kay Sievers
2011/11/9 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > That only leaves this relevant sections from that quick look that needs > some work and remains questionable if that should be handled in unit > file et all... > >       # Check misc device >         if [ -n "$USE_MISC

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: >>What other form of encouragement can you suggest? > This email thread for a start. We have had email threads like this for two release cycles now and yet the main problem still remains the same packagers/maintainers not either migrating themselves or

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 09.11.11 13:49, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:52 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:41:28PM +0100, drago01 wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > > On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 11/09/2011 01:56 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:41:28PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward the conver

Re: Proposing Fedora Feature for private /tmp and /var/tmp for all systemd services in Fedora 17.

2011-11-09 Thread Benny Amorsen
Lennart Poettering writes: > Well, that way attackers might still be able fool the admin: i.e. he > could create a directory with a service name and some randomized suffix > and the admin might blindly believe that this directory belongs to the > service, even if it doesn't, but belongs to the ev

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

2011-11-09 Thread drago01
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:41:28PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> > On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward >> > the conversion of the sysvinit scripts to systemd uni