On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:42:10 -0500, TL (Tom) wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I plan to provide the 1.2.x libpng shared library (and only the library,
not its devel support files) in a libpng-compat subpackage for the time
being.
Any reason why the compat
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects
enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to
the devel list about this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes applications
in
them, so I wrote a small shell script:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
On my F16 installation, it finds around 60 packages that are libraries with
applications. I'd like to ask if
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:05:34 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost
affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up
message posted to the devel list about this.
+1
Is the bump for real this time? I
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
them, so I wrote a small shell script:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
That just checks for a path. It
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in them, so I wrote a small shell script:
2011/11/20 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
Is the bump for real this time? I remember that some time ago the
soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds.
--
Unless there are too much problems with this yes:
I just tried to rebuild kover and it failed during build with a strange
error:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3527418name=build.logoffset=-4000
The reason for this error is, however, a broken dependency.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:33:38 +0100, AR (Adrian) wrote:
I just tried to rebuild kover and it failed during build with a strange
error:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3527418name=build.logoffset=-4000
The reason for this error is, however, a broken dependency.
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:26:09 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
Hi,
according to the dedicated Bugzilla feature
requesthttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754865,
Boost https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/boost has just been
upgraded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3526523 (from
1.47.0
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:05:34 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects
enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to
the devel list about this.
It looks like there may have been a
Is there any expected semantic change for using BOOST_FOREACH?
I am having trouble rebuilding Wesnoth and get an error:
foreach.hpp:6:17: error: 'boost::BOOST_FOREACH' has not been declared
and foreach.hpp is:
#ifndef FOREACH_HPP
#define FOREACH_HPP
#include boost/foreach.hpp
#define foreach
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:22:50AM +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
just a few minutes ago I received a mail from FAS (I've double checked
that the info inside is correct and that it indeed came from fedora
infra machines) informing me of a user requesting a membership in one
of the groups
2011/11/20 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
Is there any expected semantic change for using BOOST_FOREACH?
I am having trouble rebuilding Wesnoth and get an error:
foreach.hpp:6:17: error: 'boost::BOOST_FOREACH' has not been declared
and foreach.hpp is:
#ifndef FOREACH_HPP
#define FOREACH_HPP
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 18:13:14 +0100,
Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org wrote:
2011/11/20 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
Is there any expected semantic change for using BOOST_FOREACH?
I am having trouble rebuilding Wesnoth and get an error:
foreach.hpp:6:17: error:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
If you install BOTH the 64-bit and 32-bit packages, the 64-bit version (on
all the platforms where 64-bit is
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
If you install BOTH the 64-bit and
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
- the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:33:34PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
I will soon update libcdio to 0.83 in rawhide which requires a rebuild
of following the packages:
audacious-plugins
cdw
gvfs
kover
libcddb
oxine
pragha
pycdio
qmmp
xmms2
I will rebuild these packages if the
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
Does anybody know of anything I can try in Fedora 16 to get the other half
of my files from the Deja DUP backup?
Thanks,
Richard
On Nov 20, 2011 7:17 AM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
applications in
them, so
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-11-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:16:32 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I don't think it is directly related. It is odd that the include is getting
flagged rather than an actual use. That could be a boost - gcc interaction.
I noticed that adding some extra includes that were used in
Summary of changes:
63686e1... update to 4.70 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
63686e1... update to 4.70 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Gtk2-1.241 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755283
Summary: perl-Gtk2-1.241 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
29 matches
Mail list logo
