On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Doesn't matter. The question is whether there is a change in trend. It's
improbable that KDE adoption is increasing in statistically significant
numbers, while at the same time KDE spin downloads remain flat, just
Summary of changes:
3d5001f... Update to 0.13 (*)
de11424... Fedora 17 mass rebuild (*)
7fba86a... Update to 0.14 (*)
f808bda... Update to 0.15 (*)
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
... and reboot is still not working on Fedora 16 on several machines...
do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
++
| Alfredo Ferrari
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.17-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
... with clean install and on Fedora 16, two duifferent machines
++
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.767.6119 |
| C.E.R.N.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787216
massimo.pala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I wonder if there is a way to accurately gauge hours spent using one
DE or another. I've only ever used Gnome although I tried KDE briefly
(at least one major release ago) and tried other distros Suse and
Ubuntu, but only when Fedora was unstable on my hardware. I blogged a
few 'gotchas' with
On 14/02/12 11:05, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Is there a smolt-like solution that wouldn't
be unpalatable to many? It would surely be better than relying on
out-of date and questionable polls. I'd be happy to be counted as
using Gnome shell on several systems.
-Cam
How would you gauge it,
Smolt
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I'm going to reply to both in one go here:
drago01 wrote:
Why must a desktop resemble the windows 95 UI paradigm?
Because that is what all current computer users are used to! And an
inconvenient fact often ignored
Alfredo Ferrari wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
... and reboot is still not working on Fedora 16 on several
machines...
It's not obvious whether systemd is to blame for this bug.
do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
Of course. You have comments
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
If not, that would be a great first step.
Done.
While replacing my koji cert yesterday I was interested in adding a
passphrase to slow down exploitation if my home desktop got compromised.
I've look through some of the documentation for maintainers and I haven't
seen any instructions on how to protect it with a passphrase. Is this
possible? (In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
the ordering of directories in PATH be changed? /usr/bin should appear
before /bin and /usr/sbin before /sbin.
Right now $(which a-binary) would report that all
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
the ordering of directories in PATH be changed? /usr/bin should appear
before /bin and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2012 05:11 PM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch,
should
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
the ordering of directories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:45:32 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make sure
that you build things for Fedora 17 from the f17 branch, master is now
for Fedora 18.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:33 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #5 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com 2012-02-14
12:23:49 EST ---
Yup according to commit 2 you just had
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-02-14 12:35:53 EST
---
Will do.
--
Configure bugmail:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:33:31AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
While replacing my koji cert yesterday I was interested in adding a
passphrase to slow down exploitation if my home desktop got compromised.
I've look through some of the documentation for maintainers and I haven't
seen any
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:38:29 -0500,
Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com wrote:
When I subsequently ran a koji administrative command, I got to enter my
passphrase a few times (and for some reason, while 'pkcs8' will accept
something fewer than four characters long for a new passphrase,
What's the policy to get a bugfix to Alpha?
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:45:32 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make
sure
that you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2012-02-14 12:25:05
EST ---
Please do. Cuts out the middleman.
--
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:59 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
What's the policy to get a bugfix to Alpha?
It should be the case now that 17 is frozen and only blocker/NTH fixes
can land; I don't know if releng has actually implemented that at this
time, but AIUI that's where we should be.
So
On 02/14/2012 10:23 AM, Alfredo Ferrari wrote:
Do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
Why do you think otherwise?
Not only read them but fix them as well.
To give you some stats
There are currently 96 Open bugs against systemd and 536 that have been
closed at the time of
Hey, folks. So it turns out all currently identified Alpha blockers are
addressed, so I went ahead and filed a request for Alpha RC1 rather than
TC3:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083
this is two days ahead of schedule, but it's good to get going early!
The compose should arrive some
Ondrej Vasik wrote:
You are right, setup update fixed only /sbin locations... /bin has to be
done on glibc and shells side. Sorry for confusion...
WHY was UsrMove allowed to be merged in such broken and incomplete state?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 14.02.12 23:08, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Ondrej Vasik wrote:
You are right, setup update fixed only /sbin locations... /bin has to be
done on glibc and shells side. Sorry for confusion...
WHY was UsrMove allowed to be merged in such broken and incomplete state?
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So it turns out all currently identified Alpha blockers are
addressed, so I went ahead and filed a request for Alpha RC1 rather than
TC3:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083
this is two days ahead of schedule, but it's good to get going early!
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ugh, we really want this one:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beefy-miracle-kde-
theme-16.91.0.1-1.fc17,kde-settings-4.8-5.fc17
in! :-(
Without it, Plasma has a blank (all black) background.
(Proposed) blocker bug filed:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Because dropping these dirs from the search paths is merely an
optimization, not a requirement.
You call it an optimization, I call it fixing a pessimization (performance
regression).
And as the original message in the thread points out, the regression
actually
Hello,
I adjusted the volumn names to reduce the line length. Now
the line length is less than 80. So it's suit to browse in
terminal. And also add two architecures: s390 and s390x.
- Original Message -
From: Xibo Ning xn...@redhat.com
To: fedora-devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789977
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-02-14 03:23:52 EST ---
Added as [ perl-Module-Runtime-0.012-1.fc16 ]
*
Summary of changes:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Implementation-0.06-1.fc16' was created
pointing to:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Implementation-0.06-1.el5' was created
pointing to:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Implementation-0.06-1.el6' was created
pointing to:
3e734a0... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c660ad3... Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide (*)
3f3181d... Update to 0.04 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-XS-0.04-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
3f3181d... Update to 0.04
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-SharedFork:
ca30a6fbfd546065883821ae3d7a8ca9 Test-SharedFork-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4d6f7e06e9c7b82974d6e877d45a10658f179ac5
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Feb 14 12:19:31 2012 +0100
Update to 0.015, clean up spec file and add perl default filter
.gitignore |1 +
commit 345d2e08bddc5363d3066c2a6a0da4a3ea72be0e
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Feb 14 12:19:46 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
.gitignore|2 +-
perl-Test-SharedFork.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
commit 7ff3c445ab10a43c614361bc6e3aab93b6b8f5a7
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Feb 14 13:50:24 2012 +0100
Update to 0.015, clean up spec file and add perl default filter
.gitignore |1 +
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
bb873f730cbd4c641f22d38d1e20e8e9 Mojolicious-2.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8c57e74a4f780dd8a510e10337b5c7f6c9a6fdc4
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:10:22 2012 +0200
Update to 2.49
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
Summary of changes:
8c57e74... Update to 2.49 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 61318cb0c08b810ca2b2af155a4d624704cf1712
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:17:52 2012 +0100
update to 0.015
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec | 13 +++--
sources
Hello there,
since I have recently happened to be compiling and installing Judy
for the project I'm working on at work, and though to myself others
might benefit from Judy being packaged as rpm, I'd like to push
my packaging efforts further to Fedora.
I have already filed a review request in
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-SMIME:
a613ab022d38b66b923b1d45b4af5ba9 Crypt-SMIME-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4fa8811b2fb5c7b09f0a5c231766a34cdaca521b
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Tue Feb 14 21:02:39 2012 +0100
Update to 0.10
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Crypt-SMIME.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
The unsigned tag 'perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.10-1.fc18' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Tue Feb 14 21:03:15 2012 +0100
Update to 0.10
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Crypt-SMIME-0_09-4_fc14':
Dennis Gilmore (2):
- Rebuilt for
Summary of changes:
4fa8811... Update to 0.10 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The unsigned tag 'perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.10-1.fc17' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Tue Feb 14 21:03:48 2012 +0100
Update to 0.10
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Crypt-SMIME-0_09-4_fc14':
Dennis Gilmore (2):
- Rebuilt for
Summary of changes:
345d2e0... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
60 matches
Mail list logo
