Re: SSD drives

2012-05-25 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
2012/5/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de: On Thu, 24.05.12 10:30, Juan Orti Alcaine (j.orti.alca...@gmail.com) wrote: - Disable the readahead service:      systemctl disable systemd-readahead-collect.service      systemctl disable systemd-readahead-replay.service The readahead

Re: How to proceed with MiniDebugInfo

2012-05-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 22:24 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Wrt upstreaming the patch to FSF GDB first it can be posted but I would keep it for a release or two only downstream, it is simple enough patch, there may be found some issues with its practical use (if any) etc. I agree with Jan. The

Re: How to proceed with MiniDebugInfo

2012-05-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:20 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed minidebuginfo putting them in the main binaries, and

Re: How to proceed with MiniDebugInfo

2012-05-25 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 05/25/2012 09:26 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:20 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed

Re: Packaging pyroscope

2012-05-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:23:59 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hey folks, I was wondering if anyone's ever considered packaging pyroscope[1] for Fedora? It adds quite a lot of functionality to rtorrent. I've just started looking into it, and the building looks pretty messy. This is the build

Re: Introducing pyp2rpm - A python package to rpm specfile convertor

2012-05-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 05/23/2012 06:55 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: # monkey patch ZipFile to behave like TarFile ZipFile.getmembers = ZipFile.infolist ZipFile.extractfile = ZipFile.open ZipFile.open = ZipFile # this line is at fault here ZipInfo.name = ZipInfo.filename Real zipfile.ZipFile.open opens member of

Re: Introducing pyp2rpm - A python package to rpm specfile convertor

2012-05-25 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - On 05/23/2012 06:55 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: # monkey patch ZipFile to behave like TarFile ZipFile.getmembers = ZipFile.infolist ZipFile.extractfile = ZipFile.open ZipFile.open = ZipFile # this line is at fault here ZipInfo.name = ZipInfo.filename Real

Re: Packaging pyroscope

2012-05-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On-the-fly downloading of source archives and patches won't be acceptable, since these files must be included in the src.rpm (with the packagers being in the position to control what will be used/packaged). It would be necessary to

Re: SSD drives

2012-05-25 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 05/24/2012 03:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: Since I'm putting an SSD in my laptop this is important because the laptop drive must be encrypted. I hope your CPU has AES-NI. A powerful i7 does AES at 50MiB/s (don't remember exactly, but below 100MiB/s) without AES-NI and about 900MiB/s with

[perl-Crypt-DES] Update build-time dependencies

2012-05-25 Thread Petr Pisar
commit a310505c7aa482be2dc4a4e695e36648a38ed604 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri May 25 11:09:16 2012 +0200 Update build-time dependencies perl-Crypt-DES.spec | 14 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Crypt-DES.spec

[perl-Crypt-DES] Do not export private libraries

2012-05-25 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 5192e5982706cc8716fc513ad7c162ac50338a45 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri May 25 11:11:47 2012 +0200 Do not export private libraries perl-Crypt-DES.spec |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Crypt-DES.spec

Re: Packaging pyroscope

2012-05-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:41:14 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: What worries me is that pyroscope has a rtorrent-extended interface, which is just application of some patches to the original rtorrent source. It even uses the rtorrent tars, the code isn't forked or anything. What exactly you plan to

F-17 Branched report: 20120525 changes

2012-05-25 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri May 25 08:15:05 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires

Re: SSD drives

2012-05-25 Thread Gerry Reno
On 05/25/2012 04:40 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 05/24/2012 03:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: Since I'm putting an SSD in my laptop this is important because the laptop drive must be encrypted. I hope your CPU has AES-NI. A powerful i7 does AES at 50MiB/s (don't remember exactly, but below

Still begging for reviews...

2012-05-25 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, I'm still begging for reviewers; I tried to contact many people with Review Requests open that I could review but had no success; so I'm reverting back to the mailing list. Anyone with some free time willing to review one of these? I particularly need the 4 libraries to proceed with other

Re: gnome-shell-extension-updater for fedora

2012-05-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote: Am about to package this: gnome-shell-extension-updater https://github.com/eonpatapon/gnome-shell-extension-updater Just wondering in case if somebody else is working on it Note that Jasper has plans to integrate extension

Broken dependencies: perl-Net-OpenSSH

2012-05-25 Thread buildsys
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits}) On i386: perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits}) Please resolve

Re: /usr/sbin/validate clash with /usr/bin/validate

2012-05-25 Thread Wes Hardaker
Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com writes: I humbly suggest that the dnssec-tools package should consider changing the name of that executable as well, perhaps dnssec-validate. I've changed the fedora package to move it to dt- prefix and we had a discussion the other day about renaming it in the

Re: Still begging for reviews...

2012-05-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:39 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823446 - libradius I'm taking this one. It may come in handy soon (we're talking about doing a RADIUS auth provider for SSSD). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

rawhide report: 20120525 changes

2012-05-25 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri May 25 08:15:05 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48

Re: Still begging for reviews...

2012-05-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 10:26 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:39 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823446 - libradius I'm taking this one. It may come in handy soon (we're talking about doing a RADIUS auth provider for SSSD).

new release of Perl

2012-05-25 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Hi Perl SIG, as you probably already found out the new Perl 5.16.0 was released. http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2012/05/msg186903.html The perl-5.16.0 is now building fine in scratch. You can find it in rc branch of our Fedora perl git. More details about annual rebuild will

Re: Still begging for reviews...

2012-05-25 Thread Simone Caronni
Thanks, any review you need please ask. Regards, --Simone On 25 May 2012 16:34, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 10:26 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:39 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823446

Review: BZ71830, BZ744432

2012-05-25 Thread Nelson Marques
If anyone can help with reviewing this 2 topics, it would be awesome, considering that UH is on the Games SIG wishlist - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744432 -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches

Re: why is gurb-menu hidden as default?

2012-05-25 Thread Peter Jones
Matthew said: Add a byte to the grub config block (wherever setdefault gets written) indicating whether a boot was clean or not. Have grub set clear that at kernel load, and then have a userspace app that sets it at the completion of boot. Check whether it's set or not on next boot and use

[PATCH] Add check_completed_boot command on EFI systems.

2012-05-25 Thread Peter Jones
check_completed_boot guid [timeout] checks for a 1-byte integer in an EFI variable guid:CompletedBoot and sets a command-line specified timeout, with a default of 30s, if the variable is not equal to 1. This can be used to enter the grub menus in the event that your OS did not correctly boot on

[389-devel] please review revised ticket #110 - RFE - limiting Directory Manager (nsslapd-rootdn) bind access by source host

2012-05-25 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/110 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/110/0001-Ticket-110-RFE-limiting-root-DN-by-host-IP-time-of-d.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: why is gurb-menu hidden as default?

2012-05-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 11:35 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: Matthew said: Add a byte to the grub config block (wherever setdefault gets written) indicating whether a boot was clean or not. Have grub set clear that at kernel load, and then have a userspace app that sets it at the completion

Fedora Kernel Meeting Minutes 05-24-2012

2012-05-25 Thread Josh Boyer
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora Kernel == Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-25/fedora-kernel.2012-05-25-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

[389-devel] Please review: fix coverity issues with uninit vals, no return checking

2012-05-25 Thread Rich Megginson
From a2dec53772cc1f5f72e701dddf16430229851485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:39:09 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] fix coverity issues with uninit vals, no return checking 12766 Uninitialized pointer read In _entryrdn_replace_suffix_id():

Re: [389-devel] Please review: fix coverity issues with uninit vals, no return checking

2012-05-25 Thread Mark Reynolds
ack On 05/25/2012 02:41 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Strategy for packaging an ARM Cortex-M toolchain

2012-05-25 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 05/23/2012 12:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 05/23/2012 06:07 PM, Rob Spanton wrote: So is it best to attempt to get one arm-binutils package and remove redundancy, or is it going to be more productive to just put up with the redundancy for now? No, this will hardly work and would be a

Re: Strategy for packaging an ARM Cortex-M toolchain

2012-05-25 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 05/25/2012 12:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I recomment to implement 2 separate toolchains with separate packages. Well, maybe that's true in the interest of expediency, but it's hardly an optimal solution. Would it at least be possible to list reasons why binutils have to be different,

[389-devel] please review ticket#28 - MOD operations with chained delete/add get back error 53 on backend config

2012-05-25 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/28 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/28/0001-Ticket-28-MOD-operations-with-chained-delete-add-get.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Strategy for packaging an ARM Cortex-M toolchain

2012-05-25 Thread William Cohen
On 05/23/2012 12:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 05/23/2012 06:07 PM, Rob Spanton wrote: Hi, There are an increasing number of ARM Cortex-M based boards around, and I'd like to get a cross-compilation toolchain for them into the Fedora repositories. I'd like to make it just as easy to

Re: Still begging for reviews...

2012-05-25 Thread Richard Vickery
I have the time, and lack the knowledge of compiling(?) these; could you tell me how to get them to run? - Richard On May 25, 2012 6:40 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm still begging for reviewers; I tried to contact many people with Review Requests open that I could

File Sane-0.05.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by bjohnson

2012-05-25 Thread Bernard Johnson
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sane: ad42db3b9173a82e02490283665416a5 Sane-0.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Sane] v 0.05

2012-05-25 Thread Bernard Johnson
commit e59675ef0e59129f8871896c679a19a3020c1851 Author: Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com Date: Fri May 25 19:25:04 2012 -0600 v 0.05 .gitignore |1 + perl-Sane.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Sane/f17] v 0.05

2012-05-25 Thread Bernard Johnson
Summary of changes: e59675e... v 0.05 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Sane/f16] v 0.05

2012-05-25 Thread Bernard Johnson
Summary of changes: e59675e... v 0.05 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strategy for packaging an ARM Cortex-M toolchain

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/25/2012 10:45 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 05/25/2012 12:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I recomment to implement 2 separate toolchains with separate packages. Well, maybe that's true in the interest of expediency, but it's hardly an optimal solution. Would it at least be possible to