Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:24 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simo Sorce wrote:
There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
or will be common enough.
The 2 use cases for which a properly configurable and dynamically
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
WHEN THIS WILL LAND
It's in initscripts git now, will package shortly for F18/F17/F16.
initscripts-9.38-1.fc18
initscripts-9.37.1-1.fc17
initscripts-9.34.3-1.fc16
to be precise.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi.
The link is :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=832353perl-Net-Dropbox-API
I can review a package in C/C++, Perl or Python.
robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jesse Keating wrote:
On 06/20/2012 09:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
Of course for this to work properly we need some level of integration
between Network Manager and the DNS caching server so that
Neal Becker wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On 06/20/2012 09:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
Of course for this to work properly we need some level of integration
between Network Manager and the DNS
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:09:17PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:56 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
Then the curious minds ask ... why clean_requirements_on_remove = 1
isn't a default?
The main two main reasons we didn't just turn it on when written are:
1. New code in
Greetings.
We have some users who are owners or initialcc on Fedora packages, but
have no bugzilla account that matches up with the email they have
listed in the Fedora account system.
See:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/861
for more details.
If anyone knows any way to contact the
Upstart has been orphaned in rawhide since 2012-04-26.
I would like to drop support for it from the initscripts package proper, but
if someone is willing to maintain upstart, I'd be glad to give you the boot
infrastrucutre bits therein in whatever form you'd like to maintain along
with upstart.
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
If no one claims any
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you
Hello,
Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the orphaned
packages, without being sponsored into the packager group yet?
I do have an accepted package, but the reviewer is now in the process
of getting sponsor status.
Would it be possible for me to already request it, or should I
PU == Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com writes:
PU Hello, Would it be a possibility for me to pick up one of the
PU orphaned packages, without being sponsored into the packager group
PU yet?
The answer is of course no, but he's now been sponsored and is free to
take ownership of some of
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Package papyon (orphan)
comaintained by: itamarjp
I will take papyon, emesene still uses it.
Be aware, this will probably be
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:55:19 -0400
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Package Pound (orphan)
I'm taking Pound in the interests of Swift, while we're figuring out
what the standard reverse proxy in Fedora is.
-- P
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SUPER:
0eee5ff59b912f9baa5dc852681238a0 SUPER-1.20120705.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.20120705-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
7f3f6f2... Update to 1.20120705
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-DH:
5494c91420bf77de4af808fcafb6c3ce Crypt-DH-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5e8cb8f0eabe2072242c8918ce25e230edd9464a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jul 6 12:48:52 2012 +0100
Update to 0.07
- New upstream release 0.07
- Made Math::BigInt::* dependency dynamic to avoid Math::BigInt falling
back
to BigInt backends that
The lightweight tag 'perl-Crypt-DH-0.07-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
5e8cb8f... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
Bug ID: 838120
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
URL: http://search.cpan.org/~drolsky/DateTime/
Version: 15
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com ---
Agreed.
Steve, if you're still with us, I'm happy to take ownership of perl-DateTime.
Since you never commented on bug 730658 when I split out DT::TZ and DT::Locale,
I guess I'm already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716174
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660922
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
23 matches
Mail list logo
