On 2012-07-16 22:50, Clive Hills wrote:
Coincidentally I was looking at gtm this weekend.
One of the interesting points in re packaging it is that one must
bootstrap gtm from an existing gtm using the providing source.
I'm wondering a bit how that might be affected by the Fedora packaging
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Non-existing /proc/self/exe
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Non-existing /proc/self/exe
On 07/17/2012 03:02 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote:
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian. Push all
the security updates to it.
Uhm, we have that. It is called RHEL
Not quite although RHEL errata are also categorised as
Clive,
It is great to hear that you are already interested in gtm.
The good news is that during the Debian packaging
we solved the bootstrapping problem. We worked
along with upstream and with Debian developers
to find a suitable solution.
The reason why gtm is needed in order to build gtm, is
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:17:59 +0800
Mike Manilone crtm...@gmx.us wrote:
於 一，2012-07-16 於 22:02 -0400，Paul Wouters 提到：
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote:
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian.
Push all the security updates to it.
Uhm, we have that. It
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
On 17/07/12 02:40, Mike Manilone wrote:
Hi, list
I don't want too many updates so I disable the updates repo. But
later I found that fedora repo has no updates so I couldn't get any
security updates.
I'm not really sure, this would give you, what you really want;
especially, it may even
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:01:23AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is
Bryn M. Reeves writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
On 07/17/2012 12:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
Yes, it's the pathname that started this process. Yes, that pathname
may point to file that no longer exists. That's UNIX.
No, that's Linux with prelink installed.
And a number of other common configurations for e.g. a
Bryn M. Reeves writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
Yes, it's the pathname that started this process. Yes, that pathname
may point to file that no longer exists. That's UNIX.
No, that's Linux with prelink installed.
And a number of other common
Tomasz Torcz writes:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:01:23AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state
On 07/17/2012 12:42 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
… which can be used to reset the
application, so that it knows that it's been updated.
Because that is a common need across many packages.
Apparently being notified of a prelink is not such a common need. Even
if such a thing did exist it could
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
Non-existing /proc/self/exe file is a normal UNIX process state so a UNIX
It is anything but normal. The normal state of things is documented by
proc(5).
Documentation tends to be written
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Scott Schmit writes:
And what's the pathname of a deleted file?
My point exactly. There is none. Thanks, prelink!
Thanks, UNIX. What is the pathname of a file with several links?
The pathnames just doesn't mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that
we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up
in dates it
On 07/16/2012 07:38 PM, Till Maas wrote:
I was asked to send to send the status of the last run of the Upstream
Release Monitoring tool to this list. It would consist of all lines in
http://till.fedorapeople.org/tmp/cnucnu-last.log
that mention that a package is outdated. Would you welcome this
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
Well, SCM_RIGHTS/SCM_CREDENTIALS is how you get the peer's pid in the first
place.
This would be an additional check, on top of that.
Is there any value in this additional check (that nobody else
apparently does)? Do you not
Am 17.07.2012 02:40, schrieb Mike Manilone:
Hi, list
I don't want too many updates so I disable the updates repo. But later
I found that fedora repo has no updates so I couldn't get any security
updates.
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian. Push all
the
Hey list,
I've been a contributor to upstream systemtap since mid 2010 and have
been a Fedora user since Fedora 12. Prior to joining Red Hat full
time, I participated in their internship program while completing a
computer engineering degree at Queens University. I'd like to become a
packager
Hi!
This a friendly reminder that The Fedora 18 Feature Submission
Deadline is coming soon (maybe too soon for some of you;-) - see
the Fedora 18 Schedule [1] - and it's exactly in one week,
on Tuesday, July 24, 2012. After this date newly submitted
features will be targeted for Fedora 19 unless
Hi:
pdfmod is just one package of distance to get into F18 since the two
dependencies are now approved.
Someone want to review it?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org
Date: Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:16 PM
Subject: Package review requests related with pdfmod
To:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
If no one claims any
Hey, folks. It's that time again - time to start thinking about Test
Days for Fedora 18.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users and developers
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:51:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for
* Till Maas [17/07/2012 07:09] :
I was asked to send to send the status of the last run of the Upstream
Release Monitoring tool to this list. It would consist of all lines in
http://till.fedorapeople.org/tmp/cnucnu-last.log
that mention that a package is outdated. Would you welcome this or
Bryn M. Reeves writes:
On 07/17/2012 12:42 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
… which can be used to reset the
application, so that it knows that it's been updated.
Because that is a common need across many packages.
Apparently being notified of a prelink is not such a common need. Even
if such a
Miloslav Trmač writes:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
Non-existing /proc/self/exe file is a normal UNIX process state so a UNIX
It is anything but normal. The normal state of things is documented by
proc(5).
Miloslav Trmač writes:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Scott Schmit writes:
And what's the pathname of a deleted file?
My point exactly. There is none. Thanks, prelink!
Thanks, UNIX. What is the pathname of a file with several links?
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
Well, SCM_RIGHTS/SCM_CREDENTIALS is how you get the peer's pid in the first
place.
This would be an additional check, on top of that.
Is there any value in this additional check (that nobody else
apparently
Anyone interested in
gnusim8085 -- A graphical simulator for Intel 8085 microprocessor
I would be interested in taking gnusim8085.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
Chris Adams writes:
Is there any value in this additional check (that nobody else
apparently does)? Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling?
I certainly trust it. But just because I trust it, it doesn't mean that any
Miloslav Trmač writes:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Miloslav Trmač writes:
Can you explain, then, the correctly approach by which an executable
can
affirm whether another pid is either running the same executable, or the
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
Chris Adams writes:
Is there any value in this additional check (that nobody else
apparently does)? Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling?
I certainly trust it. But just because I trust it, it
On 07/17/2012 10:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
gtick -- A graphical metronome software
I have added myself to this package.
regards
Brendan
(bsjones)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
--- Comment #69 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 3.10
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.07
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/
Please consult the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Role-Tiny:
cdee4d5f88088507eb69c77ae5c341ed Role-Tiny-1.001004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 486f38bd831508b77f5d764f2d00311892090f8a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jul 17 12:27:24 2012 +0100
Tidy up and don't BR: perl(Test::LeakTrace) when bootstrapping
- Don't BR: perl(Test::LeakTrace) when bootstrapping
- Don't use macros for commands
-
commit dedd1cdacfea3a44bfdc6a198a2041bd7d7393f5
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Jul 17 05:29:47 2012 -0600
update to 1.001004
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Role-Tiny.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Milos Malik mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED
--
You are
Summary of changes:
9a479ec... update to 1.01 (*)
1019d3e... update to 1.001001 (*)
fa7aa62... update to 1.001002 (*)
9764fa2... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
dedd1cd... update to 1.001004 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl
The lightweight tag 'perl-HTML-Tree-5.02-4.fc18' was created pointing to:
486f38b... Tidy up and don't BR: perl(Test::LeakTrace) when bootstrapp
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b92f5aef9e337e5e8a5bbb04b9b47cc282ee7669
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jul 17 12:54:40 2012 +0100
Tidy up and fix build dependency loop
- Haven't needed to fix documentation character encoding since 0.79
- Drop Test::Base build dependency again to
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-0.84-2.fc18' was created pointing to:
b92f5ae... Tidy up and fix build dependency loop
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-eperl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl
perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #4 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Rose::Object::MakeMethods was originally filtered from requires because it
would create a circular depandancy. This was quite a few rpm versions ago
(I've used essentially these same
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moo:
100937be2395297989026780454d9fee Moo-0.091014.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d7aeebdb99258347c5dfb8993c4bdac073906881
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Jul 17 17:41:45 2012 -0600
update to 0.091014
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Moo.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
54 matches
Mail list logo
