Hi,
On 08/10/2012 07:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
One quick note about this branched compose:
Packages that failed to build in f18 were not included, because the
mash setup doesn't pull them in via inheritance. They have now been
manually tagged into things, so they should show up in
On 10/08/12 04:24, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
Yes. To get TextMate on Linux, one of the following is necessary:
Let me just add a note from disinterested party (I went completely to
the side of The Power and I am very happy with vim): I have met many
people asking for TextMate for Linux and
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Would it be possible to keep the build logs for the last failed build of a
package indefinitely?
I will also request for this. When I tried to voluntarily fix some of
F18 failed builds, I too face this problem and
2012/8/10 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
Let me just add a note from disinterested party (I went completely to the
side of The Power and I am very happy with vim): I have met many people
asking for TextMate for Linux and when pointed to gEdit and some of its
plugins (which are written in serious
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:49:13 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm very suspicious about those boost broken deps, why did they not show up
in the rawhide composes themselves? I've the feeling something is wrong wrt
boost and the F-18 tree ...
The version in F18 is above
If doing ports is a hard job,will you continue?
In other words,should we have to push this package into fedora?(if build
successfully?)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I've just fixed (yes, I know I'm late) gxine build. GXine video player
isn't exactly speedily developed piece of software (last hg commit is 5
months old) and it isn't exactly stable either... I, as the main
maintainer, have too little time to be able to fix crasher bugs,
and I am also
Hi,
In other words,should we have to push this package into fedora?(if build
successfully?)
Building TM2's code base for Linux is the most difficult part of the
effort; as it (may) involve interacting with many bleeding-edge s/w
components such as clang, Objective-C, and probably GNUstep for
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Kellerman Rivero Suarez wrote:
You Right, but in OSS exists multiple browsers, multiple desktop
managers, multiple media players, and stop count! In this case, I love
gedit, but is more matter of taste. I think so.
Yes, it's great that Linux allows people to create multiple ways of
painting
commit b8db8cdb8406ea8ed3aec38a33cde31a8db6a15a
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:56:17 2012 +0200
Add rebuild_from_scratch for bootstraping of new Perl.
perl.spec | 88 ++--
1 files changed, 44
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:03:53 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:49:13 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm very suspicious about those boost broken deps, why did they not show up
in the rawhide composes themselves? I've the feeling
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.comwrote:
Kellerman Rivero Suarez wrote:
You Right, but in OSS exists multiple browsers, multiple desktop
managers, multiple media players, and stop count! In this case, I love
gedit, but is more matter of taste. I think so.
Christopher Meng (cicku...@gmail.com) said:
I suggest yum switchlang
I think someone may install two or more langpacks in parallel.
Installing of multiple language packs has always been completely supported.
(Heck, yum langinstall '*' should work, as long as you've got disk space.)
But
On 10/08/12 16:40, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
While gedit is nice, it is a GTK+ app. Do we actually have a decent
selection of open source text editors for the GNUStep environment? As
far as I know, we don't. TextMate would target a different group of
people, those who use the NeXTSTEP/GNUStep
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:25:35 +0530
Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Orion Poplawski
or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Would it be possible to keep the build logs for the last failed
build of a package indefinitely?
I will also request for this. When
Shutter license changed to GPLv3+
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:30:03 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:03:53 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:49:13 +0200,
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm very suspicious about those boost broken deps,
Hi,
While gedit is nice, it is a GTK+ app. Do we actually have a decent
selection of open source text editors for the GNUStep environment? As
far as I know, we don't. TextMate would target a different group of
people, those who use the NeXTSTEP/GNUStep environment.
Ehm, ... does anybody
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:52:59AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mass branching for f18 is complete. please be sure to do a git pull. to
get the f18 branch. also please be sure to use the latest fedpkg
dist-rawhide has been removed if your
... neither does the base URL.
I may be missing something, but how do I move my Rawhide machine
to F18?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
On 10/08/12 16:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
... neither does the base URL.
I may be missing something, but how do I move my Rawhide machine
to F18?
Rich.
koji as F18-repo.
Until the other repos get created.
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
devel mailing list
This looks like a mirrormanager issue with it not picking up the
branched 18 release.
We are working to fix it.
In the mean time you can use baseurl:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/18/
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On 10/08/12 17:22, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We are working to fix it.
In the mean time you can use baseurl:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/18/
kevin
Thanks Kevin,
above working, forgot about baseurls :(
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
devel mailing list
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
This is a 'grep' tool for finding OCaml modules, functions c. in
*.cmi files (the sort of 'compiled header' equivalent that OCaml uses).
This package is currently FTBFS. It would probably not be too hard to
get it working. If you do want to take it over, I'd advise looking at
the Debian
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
I took a peek at upstream koji git, and I don't
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:45:51 +0400
Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
Just as a side note, even if this was applied
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed
On 10.8.2012 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just as a side note, even if this was applied to our koji, there is
currently no ipv6 connectivity at the datacenter it's at, so you would
still be unable to connect to it with ipv6. ;(
You can be in IPv6 only network and connect via IPv6-IPv4 Proxy,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:22:33AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This looks like a mirrormanager issue with it not picking up the
branched 18 release.
We are working to fix it.
In the mean time you can use baseurl:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/18/
Another error
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 20:45 +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 20:45 +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
Nobody really used IPv6 in production when I wrote that piece of
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:39:58 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:22:33AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This looks like a mirrormanager issue with it not picking up the
branched 18 release.
We are working to fix it.
In the mean time you can use
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Just as a side note, even if this was applied to our koji, there is
currently no ipv6 connectivity at the datacenter it's at, so you would
still be unable to connect to it with ipv6. ;(
You can be in IPv6 only network and
Hi,
Is there a reason why the RHEL 6.3 and F17 java-1.7.0-openjdk packages
provide many items with a different name, i.e. starting with java7
and java, respectively.
RHEL 6.3 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.el6_3.x86_64.rpm:
java7-1.7.0-devel = 1:1.7.0.5
java7-devel = 1:1.7.0
Am 10.08.2012 20:08, schrieb Jos Vos:
Hi,
Is there a reason why the RHEL 6.3 and F17 java-1.7.0-openjdk packages
provide many items with a different name, i.e. starting with java7
and java, respectively.
Hi,
i guess because RHEL 6.x is based upon Fedora 16 where Java 7 was a just
(official
On 08/10/2012 09:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:25:35 +0530
Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Orion Poplawski
or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Would it be possible to keep the build logs for the last failed
build of a package
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 17:53 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
- Re-organized the links on the front page, and link to the new Update
Feedback Guidelines
Thanks a lot for that!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
Dan Williams wrote:
Nobody really used IPv6 in production when I wrote that piece of code
for plague (predecessor of Koji) in 2005.
That way of thinking is exactly the reason why the transition to IPv6 is so
far behind schedule today. Nobody felt a need to support IPv6 because nobody
used it,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:55:48 +0400
Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Just as a side note, even if this was applied to our koji, there
is currently no ipv6 connectivity at the datacenter it's at, so
you would still
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:45:38 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:22:18PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
To followup
mirrormanager f18 metalinks should now be working properly.
Yes, except:
updates-debuginfo/metalink
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 16:06:07 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
updates shouldn't be enabled?
(branched has no updates repo... the main branched repo itself updates
every night like rawhide).
There is a dummy/empty repo for f18 as far as I can tell. One might want to
enable it
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
f29260d492212692f7d005af19e980b4 perl-5.16.1-228.fc19.src.rpm
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
bcc5136007177b0fe2b6fd739fb66b84 perl-5.16.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2b64acd23e71d8c12300bf0f61a40bf18ae25c0a
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 09:59:18 2012 +0200
Update to Perl 5.16.1
.gitignore |2 ++
perl.spec | 20 +++-
sources|3 +--
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
On 08/10/2012 09:51 AM, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
f29260d492212692f7d005af19e980b4 perl-5.16.1-228.fc19.src.rpm
Errm, ... guess you are aware, this commit was a mistake?
src.rpms are not supposed to be in the lookaside cache.
Ralf
--
Sorry, I know it was mistake. I wanted to upload the perl 5.16.1 tarball.
I will be careful next time.
Jitka
On 08/10/2012 10:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/10/2012 09:51 AM, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
f29260d492212692f7d005af19e980b4
commit 6e02d977ad48e9b4480d20d3bb52e8574bcd9c81
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 10:50:04 2012 +0200
Update to Perl 5.16.1
.gitignore |1 +
perl.spec | 19 ++-
sources|3 +--
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834221
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831679
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
commit a3a3e5873264b2a018b465270a6658ae0eb779cc
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 11:13:24 2012 +0200
Clean up empty line
perl.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 2c0d5dc..d2e1ad8 100644
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mojomojo:
f89931728a8ece0d82ff1d5f44729116 MojoMojo-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server
On i386:
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl
commit c2f1074f81184ed4c2e5d6de45684435dc65dfa7
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 14:29:05 2012 +0200
Apply conditionals for dual life patches.
perl.spec | 134
1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 36
commit 238c164433670ee399878d89e6bb4bc95612b0eb
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 14:33:28 2012 +0200
Bump release.
perl.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 5a13caa..b0a3c97 100644
---
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server
On i386:
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847151
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847151
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
This one is much better, but I leave the decision to you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 45d389bd57f2f4ed2680f82cc5c766329b29b35d
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:08:20 2012 +0200
Update the vague package description
perl-LWP-Online.spec | 12
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-LWP-Online.spec
commit 1cdaadd5382d759c08b5a63fca85034c13ce4a72
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:14:59 2012 +0200
Fix license field to correct value.
perl-Curses.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Curses.spec
commit e00bc6f7b7ee490cc099fb00183ee2ae42c62817
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:16:19 2012 +0200
Fix changelog.
perl-Curses.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Curses.spec b/perl-Curses.spec
index
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:29:40PM +, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
commit c2f1074f81184ed4c2e5d6de45684435dc65dfa7
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 14:29:05 2012 +0200
Apply conditionals for dual life patches.
perl.spec | 134
Summary of changes:
45d389b... Update the vague package description (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847151
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847128
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847299
Bug ID: 847299
Blocks: 847128
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: low
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847128
Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||847299
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847128
--- Comment #2 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Ok, thanks. I've put in a request for perl(Convert::NLS_DATE_FORMAT)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 5186ba4b990073a49339c5934f639e74dd268023
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Aug 10 15:42:57 2012 +0200
Update BRs and remove %%defattr.
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-Text-Glob.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844953
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844953
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-0.5-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib:
9ab773bfed05e1293dab8ffae52f5550 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.056.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4ecda4dd49f7da1e4bb5aa2da3ee0640902344df
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Aug 11 00:44:07 2012 +0100
Update to 2.056 (fix C++ build issue)
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
4ecda4d... Update to 2.056 (fix C++ build issue) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.056-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
4ecda4d... Update to 2.056 (fix C++ build issue)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
81 matches
Mail list logo
