# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-08-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's that time of the week again. There's one particularly important
issue on this week's agenda wh
Greetings,
I started in Linux way back in the SLS (soft landing systems) days, then moved
to Slackware. I friend then had me try out RedHat Linux 4.0, I loved the
modularity of the way RH did packages and have been on RedHat based since.
Started rolling packages in RH 5.0 through 6.2, into RH7.3
On 08/23/2012 11:30 AM, Jerry James wrote:
Bottom line: either both PCL and mrpt have to be built with OpenMP
support, or neither of them can be.
Thanks for having a look at this. I found an option to enable openmp
support in mrpt, so I went ahead and added it to the spec.
You've got a coupl
On 08/26/2012 11:41 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 08/25/2012 09:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> 2. On UNRELEASED Fedora versions, i.e. Fedora 18 and higher, define
>> %systemd_post as currently done, and %systemd_post_enable to the exact same
>> thing.
>
> This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now
On 08/25/2012 09:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 2. On UNRELEASED Fedora versions, i.e. Fedora 18 and higher, define
> %systemd_post as currently done, and %systemd_post_enable to the exact same
> thing.
This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy
(which can be overridden) t
Hi, Parag:
Parag N(पराग़) wrote, at 08/26/2012 03:41 PM +9:00:
Hi Mamoru,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:31 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
wrote:
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote, at 08/25/2012 09:34 PM +9:00:
Compose started at Sat Aug 25 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
-
I think you should also consider the gnome version in different version of
Fedora.
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
OK, thank you.
Just another question.
When I'll be updating those packages, what should I do?
Should I push the changes only to the f17 branch on Git? Or should I
push them to all branches anyway and only avoid requesting builds on
Koji for the f18/f19 branches?
2012/8/26 Patrick Uiterwijk :
> Dea
Dear M.M.,
Unblocking a blocked branch is just as easy as blocking: just creating a
releng work ticket.
Regards,
Patrick
On Aug 26, 2012 10:37 AM, "M.M." wrote:
> OK, I've untagged the packages "zukini", "zukitwo" and "zukiwi" from
> "f18-updates-candidate" and "f19" through "koji-untag-pkg -v
OK, I've untagged the packages "zukini", "zukitwo" and "zukiwi" from
"f18-updates-candidate" and "f19" through "koji-untag-pkg -v --all
f<18-updates-candidate/19> " (I couldn't untag
them from "f18" since admin privileges are needed for that).
When a version compatible with i.e. Fedora 18 or 19 is
10 matches
Mail list logo
