On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:57:24AM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
The only workaround nowaday is to install Fedora without
installing the bottloader. After the installation you have
to boot from a rescue media and install the bootmanager
after chroot to the root partitition in the LVM.
You're
On 10/07/2012 02:36 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki, but my
search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it.
What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support?
Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it seems to be impossible for those
Compose started at Sun Oct 7 09:15:38 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires
Hello,
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package
I want to get ownership of kadu package (I think the kadu should be in
fedora because of gadu-gadu popularity in Poland). ReReview Request is:
#863795
Regards,
Compose started at Sun Oct 7 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-10.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) = 0:8.1
[PyQt]
PyQt-3.18.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) = 0:8.1
[PyX]
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1]
whose goal was to make
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
I read an
The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
All the rating and commenting and other info, need to be centrally
maintained and it is not a good idea to try to distribute this kind of
metadata.
There shall just be a local installer to install the packages
dwalsh writes:
[only the $subject]
# stap -e 'probe syscall.open {
if(substr(filename,0,5) == /proc) {
println(pid(), , execname(), , filename)
print_ubacktrace()
} }' -d /usr/lib*/libc-*.so
(Repeat with more -d /usr/bin/foo as stap advises.)
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind.
We should lead here like we do in other areas.
+1
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora.
A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall
* Nikos Roussos [07/10/2012 20:41] :
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
course from having some people dedicating some time on that. Convincing
infrastructure team is the first step? Does this need to get through FESCO
first?
You'll probably want to read
In order to reduce the size of the F18 Xfce spin, I wanted to edit comps
- but decided to not do so until I fully understand what is going on. I
seem to have missed a lot since since last our discussion at Blacksburg,
so have a lot of questions.
Here we go:
1. How can a package maintainer
Hi there,
one more question: How can one install something that is neither an
'environment' nor a minimal install install? Say I want openbox as
window manager, how would I do that?
openbox is in the group 'window-managers', but that group is not shown
in anaconda. I guess we need to creae a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863784
Bug ID: 863784
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863785
Bug ID: 863785
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863729
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro:
3b578ca56e4925329e174a9d4827efbb Coro-6.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3f1383bdc41f11dcbe997bd9a586037679210833
Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Oct 7 22:56:44 2012 +0200
Update to 4.09
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Coro.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
3f1383b... Update to 4.09 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863784
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863874
Bug ID: 863874
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
