-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2012 01:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets
pushed stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked
as fixing the bug. Thanks!
ISTR that superseding bugs automatically
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:04 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 10/17/2012 01:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets
pushed stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked
as fixing the bug. Thanks!
ISTR that
# F18 Beta Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2012-10-17
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
Keeping with what we've done for the last couple of weeks, we're
planning to stop around the 3 hour mark if we're not done by then and
resume on
Dne 16.10.2012 18:06, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
On 10/16/2012 08:53 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
If this feature is not included then you can not update F1[0-7] on
systems that have used LVM / RAID: all my PCs and laptops.
Anaconda no longer handles upgrades, so this isn't a concern.
Oh come on.
Il giorno mar, 16/10/2012 alle 17.59 +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine ha
scritto:
I think It's totally unacceptable to lose this functionality.
+1 ... I'm Totally agree
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 11.10.12 01:48, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Wed, 10.10.12 16:50, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
My laptop started acting up last tuesday, I should see whats in the
logs from then
I'd like to run a daily report on my logs
These two are much
On 10/16/2012 08:22 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 15:29 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
Hi, I have download the last Fedora-18-Beta-TC4 to do some tests
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/18-Beta-TC4/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-18-Beta-TC4-x86_64-netinst.iso
How to install it on
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I wonder... could we make linux-firmware optional?
I would expect many virt env's don't need any firmware to work...
(but of course I could be wrong).
It use to be
On Tue, 09.10.12 23:24, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
I am not generally against adding time-based rotation, but really, this
is much less of a necessity than other things the journal provides,
which syslog does not: for example per-service rate limits, and
unfakable
Compose started at Wed Oct 17 09:15:20 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:28 +0200, Richard Marko wrote:
Previous structured partitioning dialog was much better compared to
this. Why
it was removed in favor of this confusing thing?
to keep you on your toes, of course
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Il giorno mer, 17/10/2012 alle 08.37 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
to keep you on your toes, of course
you forgot ;-) ... because if you're talking seriously this is a wild
unacceptable answer
What is the real reason for this (for now unjustified) change?
Does anyone know?
--
Dario Lesca -
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:13:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
This is implemented now, but I called it --since= and --until=. I'll
push this into F18 as well, sicne it's actually a minor change only, and
just too useful.
Thanks Lennart. This is great stuff.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁
On 10/16/2012 05:41 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
I just found another problem with the upgrade to kernel 3.6.1
My Saitek Pro Flight controls (yoke and pedals) refuse to operate now.
I can see them in dmesg but they do nothing when running FlightGear now.
Solved by updating kernel-modules-extra.
With the stipulation that rsyslog would still be available to provide a
traditional syslog-style text logs, what are reasonable hard requirements
for making systemd the main logging system installed by default? (Or, an
alternate softer implementation: rsyslogd would be installed by default but
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
However, if you go down that route, the kernel should be the same way,
the firmware should be separate subpackages, and requires should be done at
the module - firmware level by generating it from the MODULE_FIRMWARE tags.
(Unless you're relying on
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:47:34AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If you're suggesting 1, I'd be really really opposed to that. It would
make packaging in kernel.spec even more of a nightmare than it already
is.
[...]
Both - if people want firmware packages split out of linux-firmware, it
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:27:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is not a major change, but things may be broken in
Rawhide briefly ...
That's gone in, and there are a number of broken OCaml packages as a
result.
You can help! For each package:
(1) Check if there is a new upstream
The lightweight tag 'perl-List-MoreUtils-0.33-7.fc19' was created pointing to:
d8d9392... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 10:44 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
With the stipulation that rsyslog would still be available to provide a
traditional syslog-style text logs, what are reasonable hard requirements
for making systemd the main logging system installed by default? (Or, an
alternate softer
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
Less critical but important:
A hard link to an easier-to-guess name like logread (used by OpenWRT)?
/Benny
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
In Fedora 17 and 18 we have a problem where remote users are unable to
log in until the machine has been rebooted. This used to work
previously. To fix this we probably need to:
Include 'sss' in /etc/nsswitch.conf by default and have the small
sssd-client package (with just thepam, nss
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:17 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
In Fedora 17 and 18 we have a problem where remote users are unable to
log in until the machine has been rebooted. This used to work
previously. To fix this we probably need to:
Include 'sss' in /etc/nsswitch.conf by default and have
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:17 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
In Fedora 17 and 18 we have a problem where remote users are unable to
log in until the machine has been rebooted. This used to work
previously. To fix this we probably need to:
On 06/15/2012 02:25 PM, William Emmanuel S. Yu wrote:
Hi Allen,
Thanks for the quick reply.
I actually encountered this point of yours and that is why I found this
mailing list.
On your solution, I did try putting 'export _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_ = false;
R CMD check' in the spec file.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:47:34AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If you're suggesting 1, I'd be really really opposed to that. It would
make packaging in kernel.spec even more of a nightmare than it already
is.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:47:34AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If you're suggesting 1, I'd be really really opposed to that. It would
make packaging in kernel.spec even more of a nightmare than it already
is.
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
a. Use wheel group in addition to adm -- work with the way Fedora/RHEL
currently do things
As others have pointed out, Fedora/RHEL don't currently set logs to
readable by anyone other than root.
However, I think it is a good
On Wed, 17.10.12 10:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
2. Mechanism for separation of authpriv data
Humm, so, I have my doubts that this really is desirable...
because syslog did it this way too doesn't sound like a really good
reason for this. I have my doubts that it
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:38:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Basically: it's hard,
it is a mess.
but the only way we're going to get to a
reasonably-small minimal image,
not true.
Given that the kernel is currently a full quarter of the current image, I
think it has to be.
so if that's
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
What the hell did you drink today, Bill? Basically what you're
suggesting is that Fedora move to a kmod model for everything. Which
means you'd have to install all of them by default anyway or the kernel
team would be swamped with
On Wed, 17.10.12 17:07, Benny Amorsen (benny+use...@amorsen.dk) wrote:
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
Less critical but important:
A hard link to an easier-to-guess name like logread (used by OpenWRT)?
Instead of introducing new aliases and ambiguities by introducing yet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867297
Massimo Paladin massimo.pala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch
On Wed, 17.10.12 11:04, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
I was wondering if /var/log/messages could be turned into a named pipe
to which journal start spitting out stuff in syslog format when someone
tails it ?
Named pipes are single-reader streams. Also, for if they run full the
newest
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno mer, 17/10/2012 alle 08.37 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
to keep you on your toes, of course
you forgot ;-) ... because if you're talking seriously this is a wild
unacceptable answer
What is the real reason for this (for
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:38:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Basically: it's hard,
it is a mess.
but the only way we're going to get to a
reasonably-small minimal image,
not true.
Given that the kernel is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867297
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-STOMP-Client:
3d1d6d3ed3cfe1f2806374ddb7a0590f Net-STOMP-Client-1.8.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5fc89cf88c6757b9afb97054f1233304aed46b0e
Author: Massimo massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 17 18:04:45 2012 +0200
New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files
On 10/17/2012 03:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
the files are stored in
/var/log/journal/
Is it not better to place this under /var/journal/ and leave text files
to /var/log/ to prevent administrators thinking they can treat the
journal files a text files and prevent any kind of script
Summary of changes:
5fc89cf... New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297. (*)
e17c1b5... Merge branch 'master' into el5
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit e17c1b541f9576e6cc235b9e0eaca9b57e793427
Merge: 9c7543e 5fc89cf
Author: Massimo massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 17 18:17:52 2012 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el5
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec |5 -
sources|
Summary of changes:
5fc89cf... New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297. (*)
2ecc6de... Merge branch 'master' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 2ecc6de5ee17bcf8db6e10deda5fe1669ffc10d8
Merge: a7f6f77 5fc89cf
Author: Massimo massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 17 18:17:42 2012 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec |5 -
sources|
Summary of changes:
5fc89cf... New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5fc89cf... New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5fc89cf... New upstream 1.8, rhbz#867297. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
In Fedora 17 and 18 we have a problem where remote users are unable to log
in until the machine has been rebooted. This used to work previously. To fix
this we probably need to:
Include 'sss' in /etc/nsswitch.conf by default
On 10/17/2012 06:21 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
That's rather far from actually fixing the problem. Can we get it
fixed_first_? It seems that we could drop the glibc caching,
Obviously dropping the caching would be pretty nasty. Having to dlopen
the modules each time you do a getpwnam() (or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867297
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.8-1.el5
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867297
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.8-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-STOMP-Client-1.8-1.el6
--
You are
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:21 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
That's rather far from actually fixing the problem. Can we get it
fixed_first_? It seems that we could drop the glibc caching,
Obviously dropping the caching would be pretty
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Given that the kernel is currently a full quarter of the current image, I
think it has to be.
No you could also use a different kernel image; build your own kernel;
use a compressed filesystem, don't use a kernel at all and
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 10:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
2. Mechanism for separation of authpriv data
Humm, so, I have my doubts that this really is desirable...
because syslog did it this way too doesn't
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:38:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Basically: it's hard,
it is a mess.
but the only way we're going to get to a
I'd like to see the current binary format officially documented
upstream, and a promise not maintain backwards compatibility forever
(and some forwards compat too if possible).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 18:29 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:21 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
That's rather far from actually fixing the problem. Can we get it
fixed_first_? It seems that we could drop the glibc caching,
Obviously dropping the caching would be pretty nasty. Having
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'd like to see the current binary format officially documented
upstream, and a promise not maintain backwards compatibility forever
Um ... promise TO maintain ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 18:39 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:21 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
That's rather far from actually fixing the problem. Can we get it
fixed_first_? It seems that we could drop the
On 10/17/2012 11:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno mer, 17/10/2012 alle 08.37 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
to keep you on your toes, of course
you forgot ;-) ... because if you're talking seriously this is a wild
unacceptable
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't think it is required to rebuild the packages in dependency
order this time, since no public interface has changed AFAICT.
Actually we do, because the BR's cannot be installed in the
build root until they themselves have
From: Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
On Wed, 17.10.12 10:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
b. All utilities should always work sensibly with grep (this is not
the
case on F18 right now)
Hmm? How so? Bug?
I see this as well. For example:
# journalctl |
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:38:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Basically: it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867267
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.29-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Oct 10th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
b. All utilities should always work sensibly with grep (this is not the
case on F18 right now)
Hmm? How so? Bug?
Right now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831665
Previously in systemctl:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct
Hello all,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
* #950 Cleanup of the default enabled services list (mitr, 17:11:50)
* AGREED: Will revisit when there is a list of specific changes
(mitr, 17:17:30)
Please review
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:05:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:33:04PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:27:54PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
.. and it's stuck there. I need to press Reset button to continue.
It did read the CD for a
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 07:34:22PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
If it is all about using kernel-minimal (or whatever it is called)
instead of kernel there is no extra work for the ones that build
minimal images at all.
It really depends on what 'kernel-minimal' is. If it's the
same kernel (identical
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said:
It really depends on what 'kernel-minimal' is. If it's the
same kernel (identical vmlinuz) with groups of modules, then I'm
assuming this is the same as what everyone else is proposing.
I would think the only sane way would be to
On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I would think the only sane way would be to just change the packaing,
not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with
kernels).
For example, a kernel-minimal that has the kernel and the core
modules loaded in most installs (e.g.
On Wed, 17.10.12 12:58, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 10:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
2. Mechanism for separation of authpriv data
Humm, so, I have my doubts that this really
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:32:23PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
There will always be requests to move modules from -common to -minimal,
and it shouldn't be a big fight (I would bet most requests would be
pretty obvious). That already exists some for -modules-extras.
That's why I suggest defining
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I'd introduce a third metapackage just kernel that requires both
of those and implicitly Provides: kernel. Most people would just
get the kernel metapackage when a transaction asks for something
to provide kernel, but if you
On Wed, 17.10.12 16:13, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 10/17/2012 03:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
the files are stored in
/var/log/journal/
Is it not better to place this under /var/journal/ and leave text
files to /var/log/ to prevent administrators thinking they
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:41:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
There are already various non-text file formats used in /var/log, fore
example btmp and wtmp, bootchart, lastlog, and I think even mysql
sometimes puts its binary logs there...
I think it's a good idea to have a single point
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 20:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 12:58, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 10:44, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
2. Mechanism for separation
Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, that passwords are logged to authpriv appears to be fabrication to
me. Can you point me to something reliable that people understood it
that way, that code is actually doing this, or even best, that authpriv
was actually supposed to be used for logs like that?
In
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
and if you log all attempts to login, then they'll end up in the
logs. I'd suggest that not logging unknown users by default is a
much better solution than having a special log; no admin wants to
see passwords (even if they're
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
6. Strong QA exploring corner cases and data corruption (procedure tbd)
7. Clear, simple, and Fedora-centric disaster recovery documentation
I am not sure 6/7 are strong requisites. We certainly shipped stuff that
was hard to deal
On Wed, 17.10.12 17:50, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Wed, 17.10.12 17:07, Benny Amorsen (benny+use...@amorsen.dk) wrote:
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
Less critical but important:
A hard link to an easier-to-guess name like logread (used by
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
6. Strong QA exploring corner cases and data corruption (procedure tbd)
7. Clear, simple, and Fedora-centric disaster recovery documentation
I am not
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
and if you log all attempts to login, then they'll end up in the
logs. I'd suggest that not logging unknown users by default is a
much better solution than having a special log; no admin wants to
see
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:39:43PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
I don't know if it's more likely. It's seems to be almost a tautology that
corrupt binary formats are more problematic. Just the other day I hit
something that caused a corrupted journal and made journalctl stop telling
me things.
Problem solved with new akmod-wl.
Thanks,
Best regards,
CdAB
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:40:39 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I'd introduce a third metapackage just kernel that requires both
of those and implicitly Provides: kernel. Most people would just
get the kernel
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:01 -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
and if you log all attempts to login, then they'll end up in the
logs. I'd suggest that not logging unknown users by default is a
much better
Am 17.10.2012 18:13, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 10/17/2012 03:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
the files are stored in
/var/log/journal/
Is it not better to place this under /var/journal/ and leave text files
to /var/log/ to prevent administrators thinking they can treat the
Am 17.10.2012 18:52, schrieb Dave Jones:
With virtualised environments supporting pci/usb passthrough, where do you
draw the line on what hardware to support in a hypothetical kernel-cloud
package ?
with vmxnet3, vmw_pvscsi, vmw_balloon to support vSphere
(all included in the upstream
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:12 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/17/2012 11:07 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Personally I do not like the nss_init() calls, it will just make it even
more difficult to diagnose 'heisenbugs' when some apps start doing it,
some don't and some other do it at the wrong time.
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:31 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/17/2012 02:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:12 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/17/2012 11:07 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Personally I do not like the nss_init() calls, it will just make it even
more difficult to diagnose
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
To end this bit of the discussion too, I have now added a README that is
installed to /var/log/README and one that ends up in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/README, and should help the user to find the new tool
set. Should hit F18 soon.
Given we default to
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:38 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I would think the only sane way would be to just change the packaing,
not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with
kernels).
For example, a kernel-minimal that has
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 14:52 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
To my knowledge AUTHPRIV is simply for authorization-related data, not
for the seccret auth tokens themselves. The Linux man page suggests that
AUTH is obsolete, and AUTHPRIV is what people should use for all auth
related stuff. And if
On 10/17/2012 01:46 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Random worry about this: would this work OK with yum's keep the last 3
kernels around functionality?
That's obviously something that would have to be tested if this is
attempted.
I'm not signing up for this work, I was just making a suggestion
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-10-17/fedora-meeting-1.2012-10-17-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
Simo Sorce wrote:
All very nice, but the current situation is that this info *is* sent to
the log.
So I applaud if you want to go and fix applications, in the meanwhile we
cannot relax security around that log IMO.
The current situation (from where I'm sitting) is that the private info
is
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I would think the only sane way would be to just change the packaing,
not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with
kernels).
We already build multiple
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.10.2012 18:52, schrieb Dave Jones:
With virtualised environments supporting pci/usb passthrough, where do you
draw the line on what hardware to support in a hypothetical kernel-cloud
package ?
with vmxnet3,
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
