Lo!
On 09.10.2012 20:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:14 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 19 September 2012 00:26, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:07 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Jesse, I'm not sure if you're still the correct upstream here, please
correct me if
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
- don't auto-page;
yes; that's the best solution. The auto-pager is perhaps the most
annoying feature of systemd. I have no problem in scrolling back some
pages in my terminal with shift-pgup, but having a status request block
(plain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 1.51
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.49
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-TimeZone/
Please consult the
Hello,
On 18 October 2012 09:57, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
--with-egl-platforms=x11,drm%{!?rhel:,wayland} \
The ,wayland is not added, as rhel is defined now as 0 when building
with fedpgk. If you build a srpm and try to build it with rpmbuild then
it works, as it's not
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
One way to achieve that should be to provide /var/log/README with the
appropriate hints, since I assume much more people will look for logs
in /var/log like it used to be in most of Linux history rather than in
a tool logread that is known by an
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Schultz ajsch...@verizon.net wrote:
Additionally, it maybe useful to log this information for intrusion
detection and correlation.
Again, you don't need to know that the attacker guessed a username of bob.
You simply need to recognize that N attempts
On 18.10.2012 10:45, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 18 October 2012 09:57, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info
mailto:fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
--with-egl-platforms=x11,drm%{!?rhel:,wayland} \
The ,wayland is not added, as rhel is defined now as 0 when building
with fedpgk. If you
Compose started at Thu Oct 18 09:15:36 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires
Le Mer 17 octobre 2012 20:39, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
So, that passwords are logged to authpriv appears to be fabrication to
me.
Anything auth-related will log passwords, because users are so fed up with
password prompts they type them in zombie mode, and every once in a while
they end
Hello all,
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 API/ABI to more recent
jpeg8 API/ABI for Fedora 19.
All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have to be rebuilt. Since I have
On 18 October 2012 14:47, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
With the old one I had to check like this (first line) for building;
which is not correct anyway as the behaviour was different as well
between fedpkg and rpmbuild/mock: [...]
And that should not be the case imho. But
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
You'd want to do it something like that.
kernel-minimal as you say but with a Provides: kernel, kernel-common as you
say.
I'd introduce a third metapackage just kernel that requires both of those
and implicitly Provides: kernel. Most people
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 API/ABI to more
recent
jpeg8 API/ABI for Fedora 19.
All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
All of this can probably already be done with a new 'flavor' in the
existing kernel.spec. I really wouldn't do the common/minimal split
though. It just makes it more complicated for not a whole lot of gain.
The idea that
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 API/ABI to more
recent
jpeg8
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
All of this can probably already be done with a new 'flavor' in the
existing kernel.spec. I really wouldn't do the common/minimal split
though.
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move from current
On 2012-10-18 11:35, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Hence, the systemd tools should follow Unix/Linux tradition and specialize
on their core functionality and avoid implementing features breaking
user experience. There are other tools like 'less' which are much better
suited for paging program output
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com writes:
Of course we would. The entire point is to reduce the size, and the
only way to reduce the size is to build it with different config
options.
Just splitting off most modules would do the job I would think... Of
course you can go smaller if you change
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com writes:
Of course we would. The entire point is to reduce the size, and the
only way to reduce the size is to build it with different config
options.
Just splitting off most modules
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:44:58AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'm open to this idea, but I think it's nicer if one can go from the reduced
selection to the full just by adding in the right package, not changing or
removing things. Unlike PAE or etc., I don't think we'd actually build
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:10:11AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Your definition of core modules is going to differ from mine, and the
next persons, and the next.
Again: proposed definition is modules that get a functional system running
in some agreed-on list of virt and cloud providers. We decide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:34:00AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:44:58AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
At the moment though, all of this is just talk anyway. If something
like this is to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:56:21AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
I'm really against splitting the modules up into more subpackages,
regardless of how many it is. I will not spend any time looking at how
to do that. I won't spend time discussing further plans to do something
I don't feel
On 10/17/2012 10:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Was the old one really better, or were you just used to it? Comparing
the first time you use the new dialog to the 50th time you used the old
one is an entirely unfair comparison. You have to compare the first time
you use the new dialog to the
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:35 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
- don't auto-page;
yes; that's the best solution. The auto-pager is perhaps the most
annoying feature of systemd. I have no problem in scrolling back some
pages in my terminal with
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 11:38 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
One way to achieve that should be to provide /var/log/README with the
appropriate hints, since I assume much more people will look for logs
in /var/log like it used to be in most of
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Enrico Scholz
enrico.sch...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote:
Hence, the systemd tools should follow Unix/Linux tradition and specialize
on their core functionality and avoid implementing features breaking
user experience.
FWIW, it's not only implicit
Hi list,
I have been unsuccessful in trying to contact Victor Bogado:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770887
Old raw-thumbnailer is not only non-functional, but also blocks
goffice/gnumeric/gnome-chemistry-utils progress.
Best regards,
Julian
--
devel mailing list
On 10/18/2012 01:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Okay, so with the old system, I don't recall *ever* doing
'cat /var/log/messages'. I always, always either less'ed it or grep'ped
...
Did/do you usually less /var/log/messages? Or did you usually cat it?
Or, do you want that e.g. the 'ls -l'
Am 18.10.2012 19:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Trying to come up with 'intuitive' names for commands strikes me as a
spectacularly worthless pursuit. I'm not sure it's possible. Does anyone
really learn a new system by typing their best guess as to what its
commands and parameters might be
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:41:59PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Okay, so with the old system, I don't recall *ever* doing
'cat /var/log/messages'. I always, always either less'ed it or grep'ped
Did/do you usually less /var/log/messages? Or did you usually cat it?
Or, do you want that e.g.
On 10/18/2012 01:41 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 10/18/2012 01:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Okay, so with the old system, I don't recall *ever* doing
'cat /var/log/messages'. I always, always either less'ed it or grep'ped
...
Did/do you usually less /var/log/messages? Or did you usually
Am 18.10.2012 19:29, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:35 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
- don't auto-page;
yes; that's the best solution. The auto-pager is perhaps the most
annoying feature of systemd. I have no problem in
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:50:38PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
BTW, I hope that journald will allow doing the equivalent of
tail -f /var/log/**
That is effectively what 'journalctl -f' does by default.
This would be tricky during the transition when some programs will
still use
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:46:46PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and i am doing tail -n 500 -f /var/log/messages or whatever
logfle i want to watch since years because i want to see what
happened before, can scroll up and watch what is going on
This will work *right now* with journald, with
On Thu, 18.10.12 14:05, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
journalctl -n500 -f
(No space allowed after then -n.)
The space thing is really annoying actually. glibc's getopt() insists on
that for options such as -n that have an optional argument (i.e. which
appear as n:: in
Am 18.10.2012 20:05, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:46:46PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and i am doing tail -n 500 -f /var/log/messages or whatever
logfle i want to watch since years because i want to see what
happened before, can scroll up and watch what is going on
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Am 18.10.2012 20:05, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:46:46PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and i am doing tail -n 500 -f /var/log/messages or whatever
logfle i want to watch since years because i want to see what
happened
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
journalctl -n500 -f
(No space allowed after then -n.)
The space thing is really annoying actually. glibc's getopt() insists on
that for options such as -n that have an optional argument (i.e. which
appear as n:: in the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Thu, 18.10.12 14:05, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
journalctl -n500 -f
(No space allowed after then -n.)
The space thing is really annoying actually. glibc's getopt() insists on
that for
Adam Williamson wrote:
Trying to come up with 'intuitive' names for commands strikes me as a
spectacularly worthless pursuit. I'm not sure it's possible. Does
anyone really learn a new system by typing their best guess as to
what its commands and parameters might be into a console?!
Not
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com writes:
It's not simple. It's not easy. It buys you very very little and it
leaves the maintainers having to continuously guess which package a
module goes into. Then there's the requests to move them from one to
the other.
I certainly buy those arguments. The
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:43 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
contains plan how to successfully move
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 12:17 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Was the old one really better, or were you just used to it? Comparing
the first time you use the new dialog to the 50th time you used the old
one is an entirely unfair comparison. You have
Hi folks,
Seems I cannot use koji (therefore fedpkg build and related commands) on
my university wifi. It gives me an error:
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ ps aux | egrep ssh
root 999 0.0 0.0 77608 1288 ?Ss Oct18 0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd -D
ankur 4714 0.0 0.0 106996 848
On 19 Oct 2012 00:51, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:43 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
On 10/18/2012 05:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm not sure what 'indication' you're expecting, exactly. AIUI, existing
RAID arrays and VGs should just show up in the list of existing
filesystems on the left-hand side of the custom partitioning screen. (In
a recent enough Beta TC, of course,
commit 3cf60ae2beb57e1a2baddefce87deddc0bbc0c4d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 09:10:02 2012 +0200
Modernize spec file (Šíleně žluťoučký kůň úpěl ďábělské ódy. おはよフェドラ！)
The crazy subject is to test
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3930.
commit 88d9e0fb9f68dfa4ffa4b64a20810b06b4ec897d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 10:11:04 2012 +0200
Do not crash when vivifying $|
1-perl-115206-Don-t-crash-when-vivifying.patch | 75
perl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867753
Bug ID: 867753
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865296
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.1-233.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.1-233.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867753
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
e250604603064f9d22f74b8bae79eb3d DateTime-TimeZone-1.51.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4825aaf287f710ebc2823d951cf9f99325665b0a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 10:59:37 2012 +0200
update to 1.51 - Olson 2012g
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |6 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
4825aaf... update to 1.51 - Olson 2012g (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4825aaf... update to 1.51 - Olson 2012g (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4825aaf... update to 1.51 - Olson 2012g (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This updates time zone database to Olson 2012g and contains a few bug fixes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 8744963fcfd359033c6df735e848edd3bbb7ea18
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:02:33 2012 +0200
2.0007 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc18
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857845
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.51-1.fc16
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|st...@silug.org |ppi...@redhat.com
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867753
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime:
1c35bb64f0a261cd3ab4cc161726290a DateTime-0.77.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 50167b2ccf00579f087dc3e5582d0707219fefe0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:58:30 2012 +0200
0.77 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-DateTime.spec | 32 ++--
sources|2 +-
4 files
Summary of changes:
50167b2... 0.77 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c1dcc908609be21037650817634b468a58e451c6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:58:30 2012 +0200
0.77 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-DateTime.spec | 32 ++--
sources|2 +-
4 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838120
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-0.77-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
commit b9caeb99ca3770c5cea4777b41de175582f5cdde
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 14:57:28 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec
commit 83ff69351e16eafc080de21962350485739522d1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 14:57:57 2012 +0200
Modernize spec file
perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec
commit 91e7189ef8ce4deb186f823685165b3a385446d9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 14:58:54 2012 +0200
Package TODO
perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec b/perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
commit 67c66444384247011fbf2749b1c65a8f2a1f9f14
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 18 15:21:24 2012 +0200
Do not crash when vivifying $|
1-perl-115206-Don-t-crash-when-vivifying.patch | 51
perl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865296
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.14.3-217.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-217.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865296
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-5.16.1-233.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it
86 matches
Mail list logo
