Mark Bidewell wrote:
Here is the setup we have.
1) An RPM which creates a raw JBoss install
2) An RPM which sets up a specialized server config (based on the
default config from 1) with common configuration
3) RPMs containing WARs (and configuration).
And how do those packages depend on each
On 12/02/2012 03:46 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 17:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
On 12/04/2012 04:59 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:20:05AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 12/02/2012 10:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
system-config-keyboard should do this:
1. Get the old
On 12/04/2012 01:59 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Looks like some packages make use of:
%doc --parents Copyright.txt README.html vtkLogo.jpg vtkBanner.gif
Wrapping/*/README*
To pass --parents to the cp command. This appears to no longer work:
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SeYbFF
On 12/01/2012 02:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on system-wide/defaults changing
features or critical path components. What's the threshold
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
Try scripted version of yum-upgrade, where all possible hick-ups should
be addressed:
https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-upgrade
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Systems Management
Affected Voters:
- Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the discussion in the
meeting is often very helpful to understand the nature of the bug, and it can
shift my opinion substantially.
Also I don't like spamming bugzilla
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
New package: brewtarget-1.2.5-4.fc18
An open source beer recipe creation tool
Removed package: mod_auth_shadow-2.3-2.fc18
Removed package: uxlaunch-0.56-8.fc18
Updated Packages:
RBTools-0.4.2-1.fc18
* Fri
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:52:06 +0200,
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
The ancient rpm on CentOS 5 doesn't know how to order erasures, no
amount of fiddling with dependencies can cure that. This also has
little to do with Fedora development...
In a thread that wandered
On 2012-12-04 02:08, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora.
I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds
keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain:
INFO: Results and/or logs in:
Just a quick heads-up, kde-sig will be working to import kde-4.9.90
(4.10beta2) into rawhide over the course of this week. Feel free to
poke me or any other kde-sig member in #fedora-devel or #fedora-kde if
you encounter anything out-of-sorts related to this.
thanks.
-- rex
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way!
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
pops cork
Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:07:15 -0500,
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
Thanks for your work with this.
You inspired me to try to fix up
On 12/04/2012 10:21 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
P.S. There is still some texlive brokenness in F18. If you have the
latest texlive stuff installed and try to install db-latex it pulls in
some old texlive stuff (that I think should be removed) that has file
conflicts with the corresponding new
On 12/04/2012 07:39 AM, José Matos wrote:
On 2012-12-04 02:08, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora.
I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds
keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain:
On 12/04/2012 07:07 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way!
Congratulations! Thank you, Tom! This
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for
this
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:44:11 -0500,
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/04/2012 10:21 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
P.S. There is still some texlive brokenness in F18. If you have the
latest texlive stuff installed and try to install db-latex it pulls in
some old texlive stuff
On 12/04/2012 10:58 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 12/04/2012 07:07 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way!
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten no
response so I'm fishing here.
I'm not sure if this is a genuine freeze; but I have not managed to elicit a
response to keyboard/mouse input.
When booting Fedora 18 Beta, I see this:
dracut-cmdline[121]:
Hello,
per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#License_Changes
...
the passwd package has contained
License: BSD or GPLv2+
however, there is no version 2 or later clause in any of the
copyright notices. So I've just updated it to
License: BSD or GPL+
and will build
On 12/04/2012 09:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If you're building an update for Fedora, and it has shared libraries or
versioned provides, look to see if any of the shared library versions
have changed (or if the versioned provides have changed).
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea in the
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:09:52PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
the passwd package has contained
License: BSD or GPLv2+
however, there is no version 2 or later clause in any of the
copyright notices. So I've just updated it to
License: BSD or GPL+
and will build this in F18 and rawhide.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:09:52PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
the passwd package has contained
License: BSD or GPLv2+
however, there is no version 2 or later clause in any of the
copyright notices. So I've
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 08:22 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
Affected Voters:
- Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the
discussion in the meeting is often very helpful to understand the
nature of the bug, and it can shift my
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
From the COPYING file, it looks like the actual intention is to license
under a BSD license with an exception for converting to GPL. But, Since the
three-clause BSD license is used, it's my understanding that that's not
really
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:29:52 -0500,
Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break some packages
but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide. The changes in Ogre API
aren't extensive enough
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:34:12 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Anyhow, helpful thoughts would be appreciated. Hopefully we can
improve the process so that it's less painful for everyone and
maybe even more useful (at the very least, less difficult to
understand).
I
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the best evidence of this is the number of bugs which get
proposed as blockers or NTH without any justification of why or citing
of any release criterion that might be violated. I take that as the
process isn't being
Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and
I will now also update libcdio to 0.90 in rawhide. I will rebuild all
dependencies over
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/04/2012 09:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
If you're building an update for Fedora, and it has shared libraries or
versioned provides, look to see if any of the shared library versions
have changed (or if the versioned provides
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:22:12 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Affected Voters:
- Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the
discussion in the meeting is often very helpful to understand the
nature of the
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the best evidence of this is the number of bugs which get
proposed as blockers or NTH without any justification of why or citing
of any release criterion that
On 2012-12-04 20:30, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea in the packaging
guidelines to suggest that people list the shared libraries in the
%files section like:
%{_libdir}/libname.so.#*
With the
On Ter, 2012-12-04 at 11:14 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
basically , I spend many hours to update it :)
Try scripted version of yum-upgrade, where all possible hick-ups should
# F18 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-12-05
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
We're still working to get the proposed blocker list down to something
manageable, so it would be time for another blocker review meeting!
Note the
Hi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
IMO if a maintainer of a shared lib package goes as far as submitting a
koji build without noticing a soname bump in it, the maintainer should
seriously consider stepping aside and finding someone else to take
proper
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT, 19:00 CEST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #896 Refine Feature
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
Bug ID: 883277
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.94 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-CSV_XS:
f89b1cb368b07e794f96d7a9995c259a Text-CSV_XS-0.94.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 960ac6963cfa635fbd05fbfd7db2c8dac407a31e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 4 09:45:01 2012 +0100
0.94 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix release suitable for F≥18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
960ac69... 0.94 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.94-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.94-1.fc18
--
You are
commit 10598a853bbd26821cd5b5fd527f1b24706a6b6a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:30:38 2012 +0100
Fix sc_cache initialization
...e-init-global-buffer-overflow-Reini-Urban.patch | 37
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |8
commit 607b0077c434239e9d24cbe5147b1311feb14fe4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:35:55 2012 +0100
Fix memory leak in xsParse_all
...cing-double-references-on-per-line-AVs-in.patch | 46
...3-eliminate-rav_free-it-s-not-longer-used.patch | 30
commit ca0bf529c67563ffb07316aeaba0467f3efb30df
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:30:38 2012 +0100
Fix sc_cache initialization
...e-init-global-buffer-overflow-Reini-Urban.patch | 37
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |8
commit f0896ef08a095dd0445fb9687734cb69ef52257e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:35:55 2012 +0100
Fix memory leak in xsParse_all
...cing-double-references-on-per-line-AVs-in.patch | 46
...3-eliminate-rav_free-it-s-not-longer-used.patch | 30
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 1.98.6
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.98.4
URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883277
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.94-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
54 matches
Mail list logo
