On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 14:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> 1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively
>> have to learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself,
>> informing the file system at make time wh
Greetings,
I am considering using one of the above to see if they can usefully
substitute the practice of peppering code with tracing statements (logging
or performance analysis are not the focus). As I would be a beginner in any
of them, I was curious about the current and expected state of the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have to be rebuilt. Since I
> have
> provenpackager privileges, I will cook some script which will rebuild all
> pkgs automatically so no action will be required from maintainers.
>
Currently, new R
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
> > >
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
> > desktop defaults, AFAIK.
> > --
> > Adam Williamson
>
On Qui, 2012-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 09:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Tried running it on a system with a
> > bunch of stuff from rpmfusion yet, for instance?
>
> Yes.
Hi,
The wiki page Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum have instructions that we
should know and
On 2012-12-10 15:56 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
Windows is very keen on formatting disks, or at least was last time I
checked it.
Lately?
You had to go into an advanced dialog to do anything other
than let it have its way with an entire disk.
Not that I can remember seeing.
I al
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email
> group that I was once part of - email may be awesome for
> communication, but it is a truly horrible avenue for conducting
> parliamentary business of any sort, the lea
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 14:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively
> have to learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself,
> informing the file system at make time what the chunk and stripe width
> are. The anaconda requirement
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
> >
> > Active fas account...
>
> So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
> at least it should
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 4:31 PM, les wrote:
> >
> > Ok, guys,
> > Here is the story. The command in the grub manual is wrong. You need
> > to use "# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg"
>
> The upstream GRUB manual is correct, the iss
On 12/10/2012 09:40 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
are not worth paying support for. I suggested to RedHat that they
provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case: it's possible
manually anyway, so it would be a nice gesture to
* Przemek Klosowski [10/12/2012 23:08] :
>
>I suggested to RedHat that they
> provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case
When you are considering migrating from distribution A to distribution B,
you're probably better off asking distribution B's commu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:35:33PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
>
> > My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
> > go to the main announce list. You can be sure you wil
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> are not worth paying support for. I suggested to RedHat that they
> provide a graceful switch-over to CENTOS in such case: it's possible
> manually anyway, so it would be a nice gesture to do it
> automatically for customers who
Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email group
that I was once part of - email may be awesome for communication, but it is
a truly horrible avenue for conducting parliamentary business of any sort,
the least of which are elections and voting. If there were money involved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in the Fedora
repositories. I recently became a co-maintainer of fop in EPEL5 and was trying
to bring fop into current there. Unfortunately there are many dependency
failures there th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832644
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution
There are problems with the requirement to format volumes in anaconda (either
autopart or Manual Partitioning.)
1. To properly install to hardware RAID 0, 10, 5, 6, I effectively have to
learn kickstart. I can properly create the volumes myself, informing the file
system at make time what the c
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc18
--
You are receiving t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc16
--
You are receiving t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882835
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.98.6-1.fc17
--
You are receiving t
On 12/08/2012 12:07 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Completely agree on this one. In my day job we started using Fedora as one
of our desktop os. Then support issues and upgrade cycle started giving
nightmares to corp IT. They are looking at other avenues now. I really wish
there is a LTS rel
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
> My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
> go to the main announce list. You can be sure you will get it if you
> subscribe to that. We will also announce it all over the place as we
> always do, on various mailing li
- Original Message -
> I took a look at the features for the past few releases, and noticed
> they
> fall into about 40% completely new leaf features, 40% upgrades to
> things we
> already have, and 20% or fewer "distro config changes". That is, not
> necessarily new packages; rather plans
I took a look at the features for the past few releases, and noticed they
fall into about 40% completely new leaf features, 40% upgrades to things we
already have, and 20% or fewer "distro config changes". That is, not
necessarily new packages; rather plans to configure Fedora differently. (For
exa
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
>
>> >> Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
>> >>
>> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
>> >
>> > 417 messages in December so far! To
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
> >> Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
> >>
> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
> >
> > 417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
> > if one doesn't pay attention t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:35:52AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> I really like to see all contributors subscribed to one announce list.
> And I was surprised when I realized, after four years in Fedora, that
> announce list is optional (maybe I did n
On 10 December 2012 16:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> >> > > I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > announce list (with cla_done).
>> >> >
>> >> > So you're blaming people who didn't recieve
On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream
> desktop defaults, AFAIK.
> --
> Adam Williamson
>
>
> Hi Adam, when I asked upstream on few similar simple tweaks usually
I've just found that kde-partitionmanager in F18 no more works...
I tried to make a new build in koji with latest upstream svn version,
the build process went fine, but kde-partitionmanager still doesn't
work: it doesn't find devices in the correct way (it shows random disk
partitions as device
- Original Message -
> On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
>
> Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
at least it should suit elections announcement.
R.
> JBG
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
>
> > Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
> >
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
>
> 417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
> if o
Or, as another thought:
announce - general announcements for all of fedora
devel-announce - only announcements that have to do with package
maintainers/developers.
and then make sure the announce posts also post to the devel-announce
list, as thats a subset and we want everyone to get those in
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
>
>> Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
>
> 417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:02:46 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Did anyone claim that? - No.
>
> Years ago I've suggested creating a list where to address all
> contributors. One list that would be mandatory to subscribe to.
> Not multiple lists.
I fear that has a number of problems:
a) people H
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
> Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't pay attention to that list for so
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> >> > > I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
> >> > > to
> >> > > announce list (with cla_done).
> >> >
> >> > So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
> >> > on
> >> > devel-announce@ fo
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
> had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
>
> Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
> test-announce@
>
> I saw th
...snip...
I'm going to call this subthread closed...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here is the lock-free version
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraprojec
On 10 December 2012 15:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>> > >
>> > > I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
>> > > to
>> > > announce list (with cla_done).
>> >
>> > So you're blaming people who didn't reci
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > >
> > > I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
> > > to
> > > announce list (with cla_done).
> >
> > So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
> > on
> > devel-announce@ for
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to
> > > learn
> > > there
> > > had been an election. After some digging I figured out what
> > > happene
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
> > there
> > had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
> >
> > Robyn sends her announce emails to: ann
- Original Message -
> I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
> there
> had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
>
> Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
> test-announce@
>
> I saw the nomination email and
2012/12/10 Miloslav Trmač :
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> I think, though, that this tool, integrated well and supported, could really
>> help us in Fedora (and in EPEL). So, I'd like to
>>
>> a) enumerate the problems with Software Collections in Fedora,
>
> Nicola
commit 7b89c187b671be53c98a73c2e29167da8f834105
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Mon Dec 10 16:04:14 2012 +0100
23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-X11-Protocol-Other.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-X11-Protocol-Other:
94ca8832f86f8a6a0c886f5466fea5e6 X11-Protocol-Other-23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:50:59 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
> had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
>
> Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
> test-announce@
>
> I s
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the nomination email and the election results email, but no
announcem
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884999
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:52:40PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:46:49 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/SOURCE-RPM-NAME
> > > e.g.
> > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-packagekit
>
> > I introduced the switch-over as per this ticket
Compose started at Mon Dec 10 09:15:32 UTC 2012
New package: python-carbon-0.9.10-2.fc18
Back-end data caching and persistence daemon for Graphite
Updated Packages:
OpenLP-2.0-1.fc18
-
* Fri Nov 30 2012 Tim Bentley - 2.0-1
- Release 2.0
* Sat Sep 15 2012 Tim
Compose started at Mon Dec 10 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar
ansible-node-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar
[ape]
ape-2
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think, though, that this tool, integrated well and supported, could really
> help us in Fedora (and in EPEL). So, I'd like to
>
> a) enumerate the problems with Software Collections in Fedora,
Nicolas's mail has covered the "single package
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885448
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 10/12/2012 at 9:42 AM, "Dan Mashal" wrote:
>
>Classy.
I wasn't going for classy ;) I was hoping to make an impact. But obviously
falling on deaf ears.
If anybody else is reading this car-crash thread, thank you for not voting for
Dan Mashal. This lad is clearly not material for our board. C
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for stompclt:
b0d46072c67be1ee43b65a7cc532ae43 stompclt-0.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 12/08/2012 04:12 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
>
> Not really! We are already a customer of RHEL. Money is not the problem. We
> want our users to use the latest software out there but we also want to
> reduce the upgrade cycle.
I don't understand what you're saying. If you want your users to use
late
Classy.
On Dec 10, 2012 12:14 AM, wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 at 10:03 PM, "Dan Mashal" wrote:
> >
> >MATE IS growing. And MATE developers are starting to contribute to
> >Gnome. :)
> >
> >Dan
>
>
> In the absence of any good reasons *not* to vote for any of the other
> candidates, and in the face of
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 05:45:25PM -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I hear you. I will admit I haven't thought through all of the possible
> permutations. Probably a better criterion would be impact of ABI changes.
> What I would like to see changed is the fact that, right now (and this
> goes
On 09/12/2012 at 10:03 PM, "Dan Mashal" wrote:
>
>MATE IS growing. And MATE developers are starting to contribute to
>Gnome. :)
>
>Dan
In the absence of any good reasons *not* to vote for any of the other
candidates, and in the face of at least one reason not to vote for you, I'm
happy you ca
>
> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
> defaults, AFAIK.
> --
> Adam Williamson
>
Hi Adam,
when I asked upstream on few similar simple tweaks usually answers was
something like this:
"We don't care, you can change it the way you like it."
Any comments?
--
devel
er of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
> suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121210
>
> The current proposed agenda is included below.
>
> == Proposed Agenda Topics ==
> 1. Previous meeting follow-up
> 2. Fedora 18 Fina
it's time to check on where we are and where
we should be focusing our efforts. We can also follow up on the recent
criteria proposals.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/201
69 matches
Mail list logo
