On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,guys...
Will there have a MATE spin later?
Thanks...
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Yes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:57:38 +0100, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I wouldn't read it that rigidly. Its more along the lines of, its more
helpful to file bug reports and post them for discussions because its
easier to keep track of.
I have already filed enough stopper Bugs for btrfs and nothing
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andy Lawrence writes:
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank
you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you!
Agreed. This also seems to be a convenient place to add my own
snarky
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
wakes up, that must be swiped away in order to unlock the desktop.
I just hit Enter or Return to achieve the same.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) -
How to reach the package maintainers?
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797838
gtk3-3.6.4-1.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gtk2-immodules-2.24.13-1.fc18.i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Le Mer 16 janvier 2013 20:48, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
Sorry for that problem. It solved the problems I was having
but created at least yours problem. I am having an almost live
conversation right now about related issues at
BTW the Fedora font packaging guidelines have
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
wakes up, that must be swiped away in order to unlock the desktop.
I just hit Enter or
On 01/19/2013 10:25 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
I am aware the best way to fix known Bugs is ... to just fix those Bugs.
Maybe I am pronouncing the obvious, but I am wondering, whether you guys
have a required feature list and a regression test-suite?
At least to me, having both and
2013/1/19 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
Le Mer 16 janvier 2013 20:48, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
Sorry for that problem. It solved the problems I was having
but created at least yours problem. I am having an almost live
conversation right now about related
i am Abhinav , an undergraduate from India
i was going through GSoC 2012 idea list
i want to take integrate proxy setting and network manager as my
project for GSoC 2013.
i know C, python and currently learning java and i am most wiling to learn
anything that is required for this project.
I
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:46:35PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the
display
wakes up, that must be swiped away in order to unlock the desktop.
I just hit Enter or Return to achieve the same.
Or Esc.
It's good that these
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display
wakes up, that must be swiped away in order to
Fedora 18 (as well as F17, F16, F15) have a number of patches in the
source rpm which do not appear to have been forwarded upstream. These
patches (four of them) are a little skimpy as to documentation but they
all appear to be bug fixes (to me anyway).
In the spirit of passing fixes upstream
On Friday, January 18, 2013 10:55:23 Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I used btrfs on my personal desktop for about a year now and it
works fine for me, other than a nagging suspicion that there's an
occasional performance problem at high load.
Yes, this is familiar. I too have used it for over a
On 01/19/2013 10:23 AM, ABHINAV MISRA wrote:
i am Abhinav , an undergraduate from India
i was going through GSoC 2012 idea list
i want to take integrate proxy setting and network manager as my
project for GSoC 2013.
i know C, python and currently learning java and i am most wiling to
learn
On 01/16/2013 12:18 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Jochen Schmitt
joc...@herr-schmitt.de mailto:joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
If I try to build a rpm on Fedora 17 ARM (installed on a RaspberryPi
Model B) from a src.rpm fc18, rpmbuild compiles a binary file
'.rpfr.armv6l' .
But almost all RPMs from repositories are 'armv5tel'.
Why ?
Does a specific command exist in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 19/01/2013 18:29, David A. Marlin ha scritto:
On 01/19/2013 11:21 AM, Sean Omalley wrote:
I'm having the same issue along with the build was looking for
armv6 repo in the build requires even though the armv5 versions
were installed.
I just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't have a RPi to try this on, but can you just use:
rpmbuild -ba --target=armv5tel SRPM
yum install moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Examining moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yum install moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm Loaded plugins:
langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Examining
moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm:
moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel Cannot add package
moc-2.5.0-0.2.beta1.rpfr.arm5tel.rpm to
On 18/01/13 16:12, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
The most helpful approach would be provide bug reports, when btrfs will
be proposed as a default file system (again). Without bug reports, real
numbers etc. is hard to make any decision. I don't wish to test on my
machine, so I would be glad for hard
On 01/18/2013 04:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
So, I do not at all share the snarky sentiment, but this still perplexes me.
What is that screen for? It literally took me a minute to figure out what to
do with it the first time I saw it, and then every time after that it just
gets in the way
On 01/19/2013 12:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@gmail.com wrote:
Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to
20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this?
Are the first 200 numbers reserved for
I have tried the following from :-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
# yum install fedora-release-rawhide
# yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
gives :-
...
-- Running transaction check
--- Package NetworkManager.i686 1:0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19 will be a
On 20 January 2013 00:58, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried the following from :-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide
# yum install fedora-release-rawhide
# yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync
gives :-
...
-- Running transaction
On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 (fedora)
Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200
Removing: libnl3-3.2.14-1.fc18.i686 (@anaconda/18)
libnl-genl-3.so.200
Updated By:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gang,
I backed up some sensitive files with DUP and upgraded to F18. Now calling
up the Deja DUP program sends the computer into a mode where nothing is
available; it doesn't respond to any
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:46 PM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896474
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768394
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Net-HTTP-6.05-1.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895037
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.029-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
I was just trying to build an up-to-date RPM of DBIx::Class but one of
the tests failed because it couldn't find the module
DBIx::Class::Storage::Debug::PrettyPrint.
Further investigation revealed that this module is in the CPAN
distribution of SQL::Abstract but has been omitted from
36 matches
Mail list logo
