On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hey list,
In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
owfs is suite of program for
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 05/04/2013 12:30 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:24:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Matthew, with all due respect the tone of the bug doesn't make me think
that there is a lot of interest in discussion
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:03:39AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Anaconda has a pretty special place in this project. It is the
uber-administrator of every new Fedora install. We would do better
as a community to hash out major changes before they're made, and
try to reach some agreement before
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
make decisions and if you don't like it too bad.
Even if that is true, what is your point?
--
Regards,
Olav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/14/2013 03:34 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
-fstack-protector-all really is all. The default in Fedora is 4 bytes which
would cover cases where ints and char[] are interposed as in some networking
code. But more importantly, the defaul stack-protector only kicks in when the
object is a char
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
make decisions and if you don't like it too bad.
Even if that is true, what is your point?
That you are
On Tue, 7 May 2013 09:12:33 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Fedora Koji Build System wrote:
Package: m4rie-20130416-1.fc19
Tag: f19-updates-candidate
Status: complete
Built by: pbrobinson
ID: 416696
Started: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:35:25 UTC
Finished: Tue, 07
On 2013-05-08 09:32, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hey list,
In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
On Wed, 08.05.13 09:32, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hey list,
In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
shipping directory in /mnt is
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
unmaintained.
(http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/)
What's the current status of dietlibc in Fedora and how can it be checked?
Last
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann fedora-de...@tuxad.dewrote:
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
unmaintained.
(
http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/
Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[cinnamon]
cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann [1]fedora-de...@tuxad.de
wrote:
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
unmaintained.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Frank Bergmann fedora-de...@tuxad.dewrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann [1]
fedora-de...@tuxad.de
wrote:
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
make decisions and if you don't like it too bad.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-09 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-05-09 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-05-09 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-05-09 16:00 Thu UTC -
2013-05-09 17:00
Dear all,
When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
Add. Sense: No additional sense information
hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
I believe it is related to WRITE_SAME don't implemented in win2012
On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Dear all,
When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
Add. Sense: No additional sense information
hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
I believe it is related
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
Mario
On 8 May 2013 16:28, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Dear all,
When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I use mock to local build packages.
I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
How I fix it ?
GEN gnome-control-center.1
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
You can search in the git tree:
[root@host linux-2.6]# git log --pretty=oneline | grep storvsc: avoid usage
Cool! thanks a lot!
On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes
upstream?
You can search in the git tree:
[root@host
Confirmed: kernel-3.9.1-0.rc1.201.fc18.x86_64 from koji fix this issue :)
On 8 May 2013 16:40, Mario Ceresa mrcer...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool! thanks a lot!
On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
08.05.2013 18:35 пользователь Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com написал:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I use mock to local build packages.
I was build
Am 07.05.2013 19:39, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
and why?
open-vm-tools are required for anything that requires
co-ordination with the guest. Here are a few examples,
clean shutdown of guest from VM management interface,
guest consistent snapshots, collection/display of guest
resource usage
Am 07.05.2013 19:48, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
If there are strong use cases that don't require that functionality
then probably it makes sense to not be part of core, otherwise, I think
it makes more sense to make open-vm-tools part of @core because sooner
or later users will end up
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a quick search
on obvious terms through
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, May 8th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status update
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Fedora Branched Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-08)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:06:59 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-08/fesco.2013-05-08-18.06.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Dear Fedora Community,
since I want to contribute to Fedora to make better and to become a
member of the packager-group, I'm going to introduce myself here a bit.
I am Björn Esser and I live in Hildesheim, Germany. That's about 30 km
(20 mi) south of Hannover. I'm just an ordinary guy using
Compose finished at Wed May 8 12:20:02 UTC 2013
First please trim unneeded stuff from a reply.
Umm hi,
Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It was announced to the list as to why, it's dead upstream and doesn't
build with the current gnome and is in fact broken
On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
gnome-applet-sensors - probably
*but* please undersatdn with your argumentation a lot of maintainers
could claim that their packages are in CORE for several reasons
because they are expected to be used from most users
please leave core be what core means
and as i clearly statet that i have open-vm-tools on nearly any
of
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-05-08/fedora-meeting-1.2013-05-08-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
gnome-applet-sensors - probably should be blocked.
openbox -
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Umm hi,
Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
gnome-panel. If you want
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
gnome-panel. If you want to keep gnome-panel alive for some reason
(although
Hi
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
The new version of cinnamon does not depend on it. Fighting with it to
get to compile. Thanks for your reply. There were some other packages
though that seemed affected.. (i.e. openbox) and some gnome packages
too.
Openbox has some
I spent a bit of time recently trying to clean up the oldest package
review tickets, making sure links are accessible and the submitted
packages actually build. At this point I think all of the tickets in
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html older than May
2012 should actually be
* Dan Mashal [08/05/2013 11:47] :
Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still
have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through
library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:09:13 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
make decisions and
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less
times a week.
A + B = perfectly
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
FOUR DAYS is no longer active for you? Seriously?
You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_?
Pete,
There is no constructive discussion going on here any more. 4 days is
certainly enough time for a mailing list thread to go inactive.
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:25 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I
On 5/8/2013 10:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
B: Some people don't get to read mail every day,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:59 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the
Hi
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
was actually written down in the guidelines somewhere.
It is not written down as policy and since the tools themselves enforce
this, I don't think it has been
Huh! Today this problem not present..
--
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
09.05.2013 8:12 пользователь Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com написал:
Hi
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
was actually
On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
longer active?
A: The thread was started on a
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 00:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:24:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
owfs is suite of program for accessing 1-wire network, which is
simple hardware protocol. One of the program is FUSE module,
giving the access to network and devices on it through filesystem.
The /mnt/1wire
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-FailWarnings:
b73257948f9b656487216f3a95812d32 Test-FailWarnings-0.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 915a739e6c4147929f48c5396e554266ffbba32b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Wed May 8 11:46:06 2013 +0200
Update to 0.005
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-FailWarnings.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
commit 1b9070b17d7d5214f50d2e518e75dc75d32322c3
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Wed May 8 12:37:36 2013 +0200
Update to 1.4.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Data-Validate-Type.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960937
Bug ID: 960937
Summary: perl-Coro-6.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Coro
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960939
Bug ID: 960939
Summary: perl-DB_File-1.828 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960942
Bug ID: 960942
Summary: perl-Pod-Spell-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Spell
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
commit fb2a90f98b279bb126a2f925236057dbc9242a34
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Wed May 8 12:58:44 2013 +0200
Update to 1.1.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Type.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753955
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959610
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959610
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960441
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960942
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
On Wed, 8 May 2013 12:27:27 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
As usual, this is rather last minute but I'm in the process of
bringing autoqa and autoqa-stg down for updates.
I don't think there will be any problems, will send out an all-clear
when I'm done.
Everything is back up and
72 matches
Mail list logo
