Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-09 Thread Ravindra Kumar
Hi Bill and others, Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for comps-f19.xml.in: --- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700 +++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700 @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ _descriptionLocal X.org display

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 02/05/13 05:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 20:26:13 -0400, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Bill Nottingham writes: Anyway, here are my suggestions: valgrind eclipse gimp kdegames I don't think gimp is that great of a choice to drop. That's a tool

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 03/05/13 11:50 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: Of course there is. Yet, we remove things like GCC from the default install. Why? or a design suite I don't think this is needed on the DVD. This should be a separate spin (I think it is already). One can always yum install gimp after having a working

[Fwd: How to make a gnome shell extension Click to do Alt+Tab]

2013-05-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Someone have some suggest to this my personal request? Many thanks --- Messaggio inoltrato --- Da: Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it Reply-to: Community support for Fedora users us...@lists.fedoraproject.org A: Fedora Users us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Oggetto: How to make a gnome shell

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Dan Mashal
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: -1. Design Suite package is for those lacking online access and wanting to use available applications. I see a lot of stupid justifications for lacking online access. AN ENTIRE SPIN is not enough? Would you like

timeliness Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread Ian Malone
On 9 May 2013 05:44, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed: On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed: you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread

rawhide report: 20130509 changes

2013-05-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu May 9 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [ekiga] ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)

F-19 Branched report: 20130509 changes

2013-05-09 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu May 9 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [cinnamon] cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that lots of unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing media. Here's everything new in the F19 DVD, sorted by size. I've dropped java-1.8.0-openjdk in

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net said: So everyone who cannot maintain currency has to catch up 100% prior to writing a response coming to mind while reading, lest he be publicly chastised by temporal relevance police? Well, yes. That is common courtesy in any form of

Re: Packaging directory in /mnt - how to do so?

2013-05-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 09.05.13 07:51, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:24:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: owfs is suite of program for accessing 1-wire network, which is simple hardware protocol. One of the program is FUSE module, giving the access to

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 16:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: If they do decide to keep the change, you could escalate it to FESCo. However, (speaking only for myself here) I would be VERY reluctant to override maintainers on their packages on something that is a design decision/judgement call. Where

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread Felix Miata
On 2013-05-09 08:00 (GMT-0500) Chris Adams composed: Felix Miata composed: So everyone who cannot maintain currency has to catch up 100% prior to writing a response coming to mind while reading, lest he be publicly chastised by temporal relevance police? Well, yes. That is common

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
The discussion on what to drop from the install DVD and some of the live images is possible going to heated as people argue the case for packages they want to keep on the media. Please treat your fellow developers with respect during this discussion. Please try to provide reasoned arguments

Re: Build control-center in mock fail

2013-05-09 Thread Luke Macken
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:43:11AM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/control-center-3.8.1.5-1.fc19?_csrf_token=348752c9889bf273010d694694059fece3649eae I need bugfix of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955257 In stable source FC19 with small patch I

Review swap

2013-05-09 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, I'm looking for a packager to swap a review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960771 with. Thank you, Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

MinGW review party

2013-05-09 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi all, Need a review swap? Look no further, plenty of options here! :) All fairly simple and standard procedure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 (mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961402 (mingw-giflib -

Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Rave it
Hi, i've have some open reviews which need a reviewer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 They were already asigned but the

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread John . Florian
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed: you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no longer active? A: The thread was started on a Friday night.

Re: [Fedora-spins] F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 08:38 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that lots of unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing media. Here's everything new in

Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee

2013-05-09 Thread Tom Callaway
On 04/17/2013 12:51 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: The Fedora Packaging Committee has one open seat and is accepting submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC. The FPC is proud to announce that it has offered the open seat to Remi Collet, and he has accepted. A big thank you to

Re: Review swap

2013-05-09 Thread Alex G.
On 05/09/2013 09:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a packager to swap a review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960771 with. Me! Me! Me!! :P I'll take it in exchange for (fx2lafw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922246 Alex -- devel mailing list

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 09/05/13 02:05 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: -1. Design Suite package is for those lacking online access and wanting to use available applications. I see a lot of stupid justifications for lacking online access. AN

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi Wolfgang, On 05/09/2013 05:10 PM, Rave it wrote: Hi, i've have some open reviews which need a reviewer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Rave it
Am Thu, 09 May 2013 21:06:08 +0200 schrieb Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com: Hi Wolfgang, On 05/09/2013 05:10 PM, Rave it wrote: Hi, i've have some open reviews which need a reviewer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages? REVIEW SWAP

2013-05-09 Thread Rave it
Am Thu, 09 May 2013 21:06:08 +0200 schrieb Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com: Hi Wolfgang, On 05/09/2013 05:10 PM, Rave it wrote: Hi, i've have some open reviews which need a reviewer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924310

Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation

2013-05-09 Thread Matej Cepl
On 2013-05-07, 15:16 GMT, Paul Wouters wrote: I wouldn't be much worried about that project. See the date of that page and state of the (non-)consolidation in the current Fedora. We should be worried. The proliferance of basement crypto is a real problem. I haven't said or meant that the

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Alex G.
On 05/09/2013 02:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Wolfgang, They were already asigned but the reviewer told me that he has any time to review them, so i reset them to sero. It would be very nice if someone has the time and motivation to review them. The usual way to deal with this is to ask

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

2013-05-09 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 07:04 +0200, Stef Walter wrote: On 06.05.2013 21:51, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:37 +0200, Stef Walter wrote: On 06.05.2013 18:38, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:43 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 05/06/2013 10:48 AM, Miloslav

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Michael Scherer
Le jeudi 09 mai 2013 à 14:48 -0500, Alex G. a écrit : On 05/09/2013 02:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Wolfgang, They were already asigned but the reviewer told me that he has any time to review them, so i reset them to sero. It would be very nice if someone has the time and motivation to

Self Introduction : Pierre-Yves Luyten

2013-05-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Luyten
Hello all, I'm just starting as a new packager, thanks to my sponsor Kalev Lember but also thanks to help from Mathieu Bridon and Matthias Clasen. Its care regarding upstream made me discover fedora. Stayed for the community ! The first package is bijiben, a GNOME note editor, offered as a

Re: Self Introduction : Pierre-Yves Luyten

2013-05-09 Thread Casper
Pierre-Yves Luyten a écrit : Hello all, I'm just starting as a new packager, thanks to my sponsor Kalev Lember but also thanks to help from Mathieu Bridon and Matthias Clasen. Its care regarding upstream made me discover fedora. Stayed for the community ! The first package is bijiben,

Re: Reviewer needed for some packages?

2013-05-09 Thread Christopher Meng
I've made a lot of RPMs but now I can't say when they all can be reviewed. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Self Introduction : Pierre-Yves Luyten

2013-05-09 Thread Christopher Meng
在 2013-5-10 AM6:09，Pierre-Yves Luyten p...@luyten.fr写道： The first package is bijiben, a GNOME note editor, A funny Chinese Pinyin named program. ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-09 Thread Dan Mashal
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org wrote: You can call lacking online access justification stupid if you want, you forgot there are users who still prefer DVD installation rather than spin. You wanted to remove the entire Design suite package set

[Bug 960048] Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so' - undefined symbols

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960048 --- Comment #6 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com --- Thanks, Petr! As stated in the debian bugreport: ... the *right* fix is to fix perl ... so that everything is linked against libperl. All other solutions are workarounds,

File Pod-Spell-1.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

2013-05-09 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Spell: 8e74b6ef83c9582fcd14d503557d7671 Pod-Spell-1.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Pod-Spell] 1.04 bump

2013-05-09 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
commit da6492ff8f0dde3e28c48fa9726d114f0ff83abe Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com Date: Thu May 9 09:26:46 2013 +0200 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Pod-Spell.spec | 20 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7

[Bug 960942] perl-Pod-Spell-1.02 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960942 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 960048] Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so' - undefined symbols

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960048 Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

File Coro-6.29.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro: e5419bcca3b248afa5294693eb4caa2d Coro-6.29.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 960048] Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so' - undefined symbols

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960048 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openldap-2.4.35-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.35-4.fc19 -- You are receiving

[perl-Coro] 6.29 bump

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6498017fd8d1529ff0de36e95490d19b34bbab0e Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu May 9 11:11:14 2013 +0200 6.29 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Coro.spec | 25 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) ---

[Bug 960937] perl-Coro-6.29 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960937 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

File DB_File-1.828.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DB_File: 519c2056754a3b1897c6d8b3bc82d6f5 DB_File-1.828.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-DB_File] 1.828 bump

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit ed9bee091ca8a615caa31c400333ccb3b359852c Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu May 9 11:39:31 2013 +0200 1.828 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-DB_File.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 960939] perl-DB_File-1.828 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960939 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

File POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP: a83d96ea20030eae7b3db33ebd553fdf POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP] 0.948 bugfix bump

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 1ff6052eff969353b1b4f1765cbf3b63a90040d6 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu May 9 11:51:31 2013 +0200 0.948 bugfix bump .gitignore |1 + perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec | 18 +- sources |

[perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP/f19] 0.948 bugfix bump

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Šabata
Summary of changes: 1ff6052... 0.948 bugfix bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP/f18] (2 commits) ...0.948 bugfix bump

2013-05-09 Thread Petr Šabata
Summary of changes: 62682f7... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*) 1ff6052... 0.948 bugfix bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 960445] perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960445 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.

[Bug 960445] perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960445 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.948-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-05-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-05-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve

[Bug 849703] Regular Expression matching in signal handler causes side-effects

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849703 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 960048] Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so' - undefined symbols

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960048 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openldap-2.4.35-4.fc18.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.35-4.fc18.1 -- You are receiving

File Module-Metadata-1.000014.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2013-05-09 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata: 052128bf5cbaad1ffd273c8c5df866f5 Module-Metadata-1.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Module-Metadata] Update to 1.000014

2013-05-09 Thread Paul Howarth
commit be7da438bcfeafe4a7ccf95c40b2fd23e07c06f8 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Thu May 9 15:39:42 2013 +0100 Update to 1.14 - New upstream release 1.14 - Fix reliance on recent Test::Builder - Make tests perl 5.6 compatible - This release by

[perl-Module-Metadata/f19] Update to 1.000014

2013-05-09 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: be7da43... Update to 1.14 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000014-1.fc19

2013-05-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.14-1.fc19' was created pointing to: be7da43... Update to 1.14 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000014-1.fc20

2013-05-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.14-1.fc20' was created pointing to: be7da43... Update to 1.14 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Schedule-RateLimiter-0.01.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by averi

2013-05-09 Thread averi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Schedule-RateLimiter: e90052ab44db83a0404c29dffd5c2b3d Schedule-RateLimiter-0.01.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Schedule-RateLimiter] First package upload.

2013-05-09 Thread averi
commit e2debd36a43e33daef4fd43357be1b3fa98a917b Author: Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org Date: Thu May 9 18:06:06 2013 +0200 First package upload. .gitignore |1 + perl-Schedule-RateLimiter.spec | 50 sources

[perl-Schedule-RateLimiter/el6] First package upload.

2013-05-09 Thread averi
Summary of changes: e2debd3... First package upload. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Schedule-RateLimiter/f18] First package upload.

2013-05-09 Thread averi
Summary of changes: e2debd3... First package upload. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Schedule-RateLimiter/f19] First package upload.

2013-05-09 Thread averi
Summary of changes: e2debd3... First package upload. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 960048] Can't load '/usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so' - undefined symbols

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960048 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED

[Bug 957931] perl-Carp-1.26-242.fc18.noarch remains following fedup f18 -- f19 upgrade

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957931 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Digest-1.17-244.fc19, perl-Carp-1.26-243.fc19, perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61-243.fc19, perl-Version-Requirements-0.101022-243.fc19,

[Bug 958180] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.04 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958180 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.04-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 958178] perl-Encode-2.51 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958178 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Encode-2.51-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 958481] perl-Pod-Coverage-0.23 is available

2013-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958481 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Pod-Coverage-0.23-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --