rawhide report: 20130602 changes

2013-06-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Jun 2 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [ekiga] ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

2013-06-02 Thread enclair
I'd like a tool similar to portaudit in FreeBSD or debscan in Debian. This tool should list all packages which have a security issue. Currently there is yum-security-plugin but it lists packages only if an update is available. The new tool would list vulnerable packages even if no update is

F-19 Branched report: 20130602 changes

2013-06-02 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Jun 2 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [bochs] bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) = 0:0.0.18

Co-maintainer request

2013-06-02 Thread Michael Schwendt
Hello packagers! Is there anyone with enough interest in Audacious (packages audacious*) as to help out as a co-maintainer? Then please sign up via pkgdb. I'm facing a serious lack of time due to house'n'roof renovation and accompanying things to do, and I cannot keep up with Fedora duties for a

Re: Packaging alien, debhelper and po-debconf

2013-06-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 14:07 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: On Wednesday 01 May 2013 22:21:20 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190 I'm prepared to take debhelper. But: (1) It looks like the

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

2013-06-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need FedoraHosted? It was created before there was GitHub or Gitorious but frankly we are not funded or staffed to make it bigger and better than it is now. The

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

2013-06-02 Thread seth vidal
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:39:20 -0400 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need FedoraHosted? It was created before there was GitHub or Gitorious but

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

2013-06-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
HI On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, seth vidal wrote: I actually disagree with that. I think freedom of the service does matter. The debacles with google reader and google talk recently should be pointing that up to all of us. While DVCS do remove the possibility of our code getting

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

2013-06-02 Thread Rex Dieter
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need FedoraHosted? I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora- specific projects. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packaging alien, debhelper and po-debconf

2013-06-02 Thread Tom Callaway
On 06/02/2013 03:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: it is possible use Chained_builds ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#Chained_builds https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides Chained builds only work in rawhide, but you can manually do the override tags for

New pkg SCM approval

2013-06-02 Thread Wei, Gang
How long will it usually take to get the approval for a New Package SCM Request? And is it true that the package SCM requests will only be touched in working days? I just got a new package[1] pass review in last Friday afternoon US time but the SCM request has not been handled by far. Just

[Test-Announce] 2013-06-03 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2013-06-02 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2013-06-03 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again today/tomorrow! Not a lot of new business, so I thought about cancelling,

Re: New pkg SCM approval

2013-06-02 Thread Christopher Meng
SCM will be ready in a few hours, don't hurry. BTW a note, I hope you can change some items in the SCM comment. Description of yours: package for OpenAttestation project However I think it should be Attestation Service Host Agent based on OpenAttestation SDK, yours seems not good. And no need

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-06-02 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-06-02 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-06-02 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve

File Exception-Base-0.25.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2013-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Exception-Base: 7aad69250044146a641fe34a2f8642dd Exception-Base-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Exception-Base] Update to 0.25

2013-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 606c6ff8e8fe1728279e98222ebbd1a0e89e29d2 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 2 15:24:50 2013 +0200 Update to 0.25 .gitignore |1 + perl-Exception-Base.spec | 14 +- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 11

File Mojolicious-4.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2013-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious: bf1cf2dd79688a63db5e5ceff3e91d0d Mojolicious-4.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Starman] Remove ugly hack for the man page name

2013-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 68c592cf0c97e7762403283a890e74c6777917f8 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 2 15:33:02 2013 +0200 Remove ugly hack for the man page name perl-Starman.spec |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Starman.spec

[perl-Mojolicious] Update to 4.10

2013-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit ef0955a31064908798e110c2ffadac4416404d10 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 2 15:42:58 2013 +0200 Update to 4.10 .gitignore|1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec |8 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3