NOTE: The 64-bit Live Desktop is over its size target of 1 GB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:16
. Please see the
Hey guys..!
I am Aditya Bhardwaj, a final year engineering undergraduate from India. I
have long been a FOSS user and enthusiast, and lately I started to get
involved in its development as well.
Recently, I started looking into Fedora to get involved and I could
identify these opportunities for
As it may be interesting and I have the data on hand, here's the package
diff between a minimal install of F16 and a minimal install of F19. F16
has 203 packages (I think it's really 202 but I somehow got an extra one
into my test), F19 TC6 has 238.
--- 16min.txt 2013-06-19 09:06:52.075305098
Thanks Lars, I'll do as you suggest!
Best,
Mario
On 19 June 2013 23:35, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:42:30PM +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote:
does anybody know if it is currently possible to do GPU passthrough in
kvm?
You might want to ask that on the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
I just create the update to PHP 5.5.0 final.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.5.0-1.fc19
Very very short before F19 release !
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
Thank you very much! It's a great feature :)
2013/6/20 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
I just create the update to PHP 5.5.0 final.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.5.0-1.fc19
Very very short before F19 release !
Hi,
Marcin Dulak: working with RedHat/Fedora systems for 6 years, and a
Linux user for about 10.
Here is my fist package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973084
I have packaged several software for internal use, mostly python and
science oriented:
On 06/20/2013 09:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As it may be interesting and I have the data on hand, here's the package
diff between a minimal install of F16 and a minimal install of F19. F16
has 203 packages (I think it's really 202 but I somehow got an extra one
into my test), F19 TC6 has
Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit :
$ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c
no package requires json-c
Probably should try
$ rpm -q --whatrequires \
libjson.so.0()(64bit) \
libjson-c.so.2()(64bit)
= pulseaudio, abrt, libreport, ...
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit :
$ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c
no package requires json-c
Probably should try
$ rpm -q --whatrequires \
libjson.so.0()(64bit) \
libjson-c.so.2()(64bit)
= pulseaudio, abrt, libreport, ...
On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit :
$ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c
no package requires json-c
Probably should try
$ rpm -q --whatrequires \
libjson.so.0()(64bit) \
libjson-c.so.2()(64bit)
= pulseaudio, abrt, libreport, ...
Le 20/06/2013 12:18, Harald Hoyer a écrit :
On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit :
$ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c
no package requires json-c
Probably should try
$ rpm -q --whatrequires \
libjson.so.0()(64bit) \
libjson-c.so.2()(64bit)
Freeze exception required for this update.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/976306
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 17 Jun, 2013 at 15:29:39 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote:
One problem with that is, one cannot blindly run autoreconf -fi and
expect it to be 100% compatible with the multitude of Autotools' based
projects. Typically one will need to update the configure script, m4
macros as well as
Indeed. This was a concern I raised when we first began the bootstrap. Blindly
rerunning autoreconf in every case is a really bad idea. But doing it in a
discretionary way, allowing the package maintainer to influence what happens
(they in theory know whether this will work for their package
Compose started at Thu Jun 20 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686
Heya!
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
wrote) should be added which is supposed to save the old runlevel
configuration of sysv scripts before we replace them with systemd units.
Now we are
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
wrote) should be added which is supposed to save the old runlevel
Revised fix based off of Rich and Ludwig's comments
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47329
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47329/0001-Ticket-47329-Improve-slapi_back_transaction_begin-re.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
On 06/20/2013 01:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
wrote) should be added which
On 2013-06-20 14:19, Jonathan Masters wrote:
Indeed. This was a concern I raised when we first began the bootstrap. Blindly
rerunning autoreconf in every case is a really bad idea. But doing it in a
discretionary way, allowing the package maintainer to influence what happens
(they in theory
On 06/20/2013 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
As much as I'd like to see it go, I don't think we should until we're
a lot farther along the SysV-systemd migration path, just as a
practical matter. I don't think removing this tool now will help us
travel farther along it. There are other
Hmm...
Subversion uses it...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/20/2013 03:27 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Thanks Lars, I'll do as you suggest!
Best,
Mario
On 19 June 2013 23:35, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com
mailto:lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:42:30PM +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote:
does anybody know if it is
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:54AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
And why is NetworkManager and firewalld in the minimal install?
We are on track to replace the legacy network and firewall init scripts
with these. It's a slow track, but that's the direction.
Overall, I'm in favor of having a single
On Thu, 20.06.13 15:42, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
wrote)
On Thu, 20.06.13 08:48, Jon Ciesla (limburg...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 05:08:48PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
We are on track to replace the legacy network and firewall init scripts
with these. It's a slow track, but that's the direction
*do not* remove iptables.service for a lot od reason explained
often enough as well as NM is utterly
Am 20.06.2013 16:02, schrieb Christopher Meng:
Hmm...
Subversion uses it...
why does *anything* still use sysv-init stuff and packages
whichare not converted simply not dropped to wake up the
maintainer which does *clearly* not his work?
it is very poor push F15 out with a halfbaken systemd
Am 20.06.2013 17:01, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:54AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
And why is NetworkManager and firewalld in the minimal install?
We are on track to replace the legacy network and firewall init scripts
with these. It's a slow track, but that's the
Can I offer to maintain it then? Who would I need to email to make that happen?
Daniel
Daniel Newkirk
Graduate Student
Yokomori Lab, Xie Lab
Dept. of Biological Chemistry, UCI
tel: 949-824-2158
email: dnewk...@uci.edu
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
On 06/20/2013 10:37 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Well, like I just said, it's a slow track. I certainly am vigorously opposed
to removing it before the replacement has the same functionality and
reliability.
... and resource usage. Having Python fully loaded for a firewall isn't
my first choice.
Fedora 19 Test Candidate 6 cloud images are now available from:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-TC6/Images/
in either qcow2 or raw.xz format. You should be able to use Glance in
OpenStack to just import the qcow2 images directly and go.
They're also in Amazon EC2 in the US East
commit bcc9c8d75b847340927b6609ad7c84d12b8eac60
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jun 20 18:41:08 2013 +0100
BR: perl(Fatal) for the test suite
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2013 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2013 17:01, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:54AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
And why is NetworkManager and firewalld in the minimal
install?
We are on track to
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.118-4.fc20' was created pointing to:
bcc9c8d... BR: perl(Fatal) for the test suite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way to do it with
NM on F17, but I haven't yet tried it on F19.
With the old-style network configuration, it
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com said:
Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM
currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static
NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN support for enterprise
use-cases.
I think most
Once upon a time, Eric Smith brouh...@fedoraproject.org said:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way to do it with
NM on F17, but I haven't
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:13:54PM -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way to do it with
NM on F17, but I haven't yet
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:15 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
I think most traditional system admins see a running NM daemon as an
additional point of failure in a static network. If my server's network
setup is static, I don't want a daemon running attempting to manage
it. If it has a bug, gets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976544
Bug ID: 976544
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.032 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs?
Yes. You can easily do this in the GNOME Control center, just try it.
Click Manual, and then the + will allow adding multiple
Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) said:
Once upon a time, Eric Smith brouh...@fedoraproject.org said:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:15:37PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM
currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static
NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN support for enterprise
use-cases.
I think most
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way to do it with
NM on F17, but I haven't yet tried
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
No, it does not support that at this time. Also note that (if I'm
remembering right) NM adds all aliases as secondary IP addresses, not as
':x' style additional devices.
I prefer the modern secondaries vs. the old-style eth0:123,
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
Hence, the RFE -- a mode which sets up the above, and then goes away.
I had not seen that mode (or a request for it). That would be nice. In
a perfect world (hah!), replacing ifup and ifdown with scripts that
just make the
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:59 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
No, it does not support that at this time. Also note that (if I'm
remembering right) NM adds all aliases as secondary IP addresses, not as
':x' style additional devices.
I
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 14:06 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
Hence, the RFE -- a mode which sets up the above, and then goes away.
I had not seen that mode (or a request for it). That would be nice. In
a perfect world (hah!),
From: Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net
I prefer the modern secondaries vs. the old-style eth0:123, although I
have run into vendor software (such as the Plesk web hosting control
panel) that can't handle it. I expect if that was the one true way in
some future version of RHEL, they'd adapt.
Am 20.06.2013 20:01, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
*do not* remove iptables.service for a lot od reason explained
often enough as well as NM is utterly useless on servers and
workstations with several *static* configured NIC's
Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The
Am 20.06.2013 17:37, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 05:08:48PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
We are on track to replace the legacy network and firewall init scripts
with these. It's a slow track, but that's the direction
*do not* remove iptables.service for a lot od reason
Am 20.06.2013 20:55, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:15:37PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM
currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static
NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN support
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:59:16 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because i do *not* need it?
becuase i maintain around 30 fedora machines
because they are all wroking perfect
Thats great that that is your use case.
Keep in mind that this list is talking about development of
Am 20.06.2013 22:14, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:59:16 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because i do *not* need it?
becuase i maintain around 30 fedora machines
because they are all wroking perfect
Thats great that that is your use case.
Keep in mind
Thanks Don, for your answer. How can I follow progress in this area? Is
there a mailing list, or a wiki page for that?
@Lars: I'll try the preview repo nonetheless and report the result tomorrow.
With best regards,
Mario
On 20 June 2013 16:39, Don Dutile ddut...@redhat.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:17:13PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does *anything* still use sysv-init stuff and packages
whichare not converted simply not dropped to wake up the
maintainer which does *clearly* not his work?
Like. /etc/init.d/network?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora
Am 20.06.2013 23:13, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:17:13PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
why does *anything* still use sysv-init stuff and packages
whichare not converted simply not dropped to wake up the
maintainer which does *clearly* not his work?
Like.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
yes - why was such a basic service *not* a systemd-unit
at the F15 release-day?
in my understanding of develop quality software this
would not have happened and systemd at all not be
shipped as replacement until the
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Eric Smith brouh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
That's one development model. Another is to do a more gradual
transition, instead of a sharp cliff. We could debate the relative
merits of the two models until the cows come home, but it's a moot
point as the
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
yes - why was such a basic service *not* a systemd-unit
at the F15 release-day?
Because it's not a service in the traditional sense at all. To
move it to systemd requires one of:
- adding a minimum wrapper that just execs the same pile of shell,
Am 21.06.2013 01:05, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
yes - why was such a basic service *not* a systemd-unit
at the F15 release-day?
Because it's not a service in the traditional sense at all. To
move it to systemd requires one of:
- adding a
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 14:06 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
Hence, the RFE -- a mode which sets up the above, and then goes away.
I had not seen that mode (or a request for it).
Matthew's post about it was precisely what kicked off
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 10:00 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
You don't need a special trigger. You need your requirements to match the
constraints declared at the rpm level, then incompatibilities will be
caught at
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 16:17 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
i say it again:
Please, please, don't.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 23:27 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
but how F15/F16 in context of
systemd was released is a sign of poor or absent QA
Ahem. It is absolutely not QA's job to dictate strategic decisions. The
project as a whole decided that a gradual conversion from sysv to
systemd was the
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
Matthew's post about it was precisely what kicked off this sub-thread. I
wonder if there is a theorem covering the topic of the minimum number of
messages required in a thread before one is posted which is clearly
unaware of the first
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:29:36PM -0700, Daniel Newkirk wrote:
Has someone had an opportunity to look into this? Would it be helpful to
have another person to help maintain BioPerl (and related dependencies)?
The perl-bioperl package itself is orphaned. I'm sorry but unless somebody
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Getopt-Long:
4eee16a3575d85b1f13478080b0ab772 Getopt-Long-2.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9648e46057523b2adb5548842aa8601b25a90489
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 08:26:33 2013 +0200
2.40 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Getopt-Long.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976012
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Tiny:
50dd79987cc43d3a8ef9f920c672bb96 HTTP-Tiny-0.031.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 92bb3862f7be558c8aa596f0c35648562adb96fd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 08:37:07 2013 +0200
0.031 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976014
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976015
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976006
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Symbolic:
d3eadccffb7bca7e2f5d9201d52366e5 Math-Symbolic-0.612.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7096ed9b527999c74e257a673604b6a431769766
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 09:59:01 2013 +0200
0.612 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Math-Symbolic.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976015
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976008
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:
fa7b8e490342bd02cb36933f122737d6 App-cpanminus-1.6921.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 734fc8aeff66ca5589ea92b05b2c2e55490185ce
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 10:36:36 2013 +0200
1.6921 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-cpanminus.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976007
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor:
a1e84d23febccd57388bc22a1510ba2a Class-XSAccessor-1.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4676c0a0798ac0e467e6cd8b24be057734034ed0
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 10:43:32 2013 +0200
1.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec | 20
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976006
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976009
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976008
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Bzip2:
bd7afcd949023ed2f3e9d9294848ad19 Compress-Bzip2-2.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a0497b0698da6e9e1f0ba71b4d47efccf6db0a6d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 10:59:51 2013 +0200
2.16 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Compress-Bzip2.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Package perl-Compress-Bzip2 in Fedora 19 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Compress-Bzip2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Compress-Bzip2 in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Compress-Bzip2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976009
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xml...@redhat.com
---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Package perl-Compress-Bzip2 in Fedora 18 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Compress-Bzip2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Compress-Bzip2 in Fedora 17 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Compress-Bzip2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976009
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-Tar:
8d24ebfc08dbe908d5b0192e4f6459dc Archive-Tar-1.92.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bec287503887d88a5056a70d93a66977357e2dcb
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 20 11:24:21 2013 +0200
1.92 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Archive-Tar.spec | 19 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+),
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
