Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I've filed an update with some 20 packages, only removing excess baggage from /usr/share/doc (duplicate docs, large ChangeLog files, etc). It touches

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I've filed an update with some 20 packages, only removing excess baggage from /usr/share/doc

F-19 Branched report: 20130623 changes

2013-06-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Jun 23 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 09:44 +0200, drago01 wrote: 2) We don't have to set a limit at all. Just include the stuff we want to include (and try to optimize that to be as small as possible). Let's be realistic: 'trying to optimize that to be as small as possible' only happens when we have a limit

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:24:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Just because someone decided there has to be a size limit and if we don't meet that target we block the release does not mean that this is the right thing to do (note: it isn't). A limit only makes sense if you target a CD.

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:24:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Just because someone decided there has to be a size limit and if we don't meet that target we block the release does not mean that this is the

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread drago01
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 09:44 +0200, drago01 wrote: 2) We don't have to set a limit at all. Just include the stuff we want to include (and try to optimize that to be as small as possible). Let's be realistic: 'trying

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:22 +0200, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 09:44 +0200, drago01 wrote: 2) We don't have to set a limit at all. Just include the stuff we want to include (and try to optimize that to be

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:20:20PM +0200, drago01 wrote: 1) no one really uses the desktop image as a basis for cloud Some classes at a large university where I used to work do. Also see http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/09/vm-from-live-cd/ -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:01:20PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:20:20PM +0200, drago01 wrote: 1) no one really uses the desktop image as a basis for cloud Some classes at a large university where I used to work do. Also see

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So here's some results. f2e707287dd82cccb05a3fef6b75cb356744ca58 (Jun 14), no update: 1019215872 f2e707287dd82cccb05a3fef6b75cb356744ca58 (Jun 14), update: 1017118720 1a0c28fdf638796bda60ed2785f95eac16a85b65 (Jun 22), update:

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: - Both festival and flite are getting pulled in by speech-dispatcher. Possible savings: 9M. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799140 The festival package needs to be update to the latest version, a possible F20 feature.

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:04:55PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: come F20. Here are some sizes as found on the current desktop spin: These are on-disk sizes, right, not RPM size? translations 402M On my F19 desktop, I have 530MB under /usr/share/locale; this compresses down to 94MB with xz

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 20:17:23 -0400, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On my F19 desktop, I have 530MB under /usr/share/locale; this compresses down to 94MB with xz -- 67MB with xz -9. And we're xz-ing the livecd and RPM payloads, right? The live images get compressed at the

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 18:04:55 -0400, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: rpm db 82M I vaguely remember a discussion about dropping this for live images because it gets rebuilt every boot when needed. My memory is that we ended up removing this data while building live

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:25:50PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On my F19 desktop, I have 530MB under /usr/share/locale; this compresses down to 94MB with xz -- 67MB with xz -9. And we're xz-ing the livecd and RPM payloads, right? The live images get compressed at the end, so looking at the

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-23 Thread Glen Turner
On 21/06/2013, at 4:28 AM, Dan Williams wrote: It's supported that for 4 or 5 years. You don't need aliases at all, Consider an anycast service where the alias interface reflects the availability of the service on the server. An OSPF or BGP daemon then advertises the address of the alias

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-23 Thread Glen Turner
On 21/06/2013, at 10:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Current network information is available from the kernel and doesn't require guessing. Why would you code something to talk to some random daemon API (that may change) when you could talk directly to the source via the kernel netlink API? The

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-23 Thread Glen Turner
On 22/06/2013, at 7:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: (2) Write a shell script that contains the ifconfig/route add (or ip ...) commands they need and have it run at boot. Most simple static network configs are 2 or 3 commands at most. If you have a server in the tradition of UNIX

Re: rawhide report: 20130623 changes

2013-06-23 Thread Jens Petersen
[ghc-Agda] I opened a ticket asking releng to block this newly retired package. [hedgewars] Bruno rebuilt this yesterday - thanks! Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review request:

2013-06-23 Thread Renich Bon Ciric
Dudes, I need help from a PHP packager if possible! ;) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977208 -- It's hard to be free... but I love to struggle. Love isn't asked for; it's just given. Respect isn't asked for; it's earned! Renich Bon Ciric http://www.woralelandia.com/

[Test-Announce] CANCELLED: 2013-06-24 Fedora QA Meeting (blocker meeting still on)

2013-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
One more time, let's cancel the weekly meeting - I'm not aware of anything in particular that needs discussing, please reply to this mail if I'm missing anything. Hopefully we'll get back to meetings next week with an F19 post-mortem! Once again we'll just go straight to F19 blocker review at

[Test-Announce] 2013-06-24 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Final Blocker Bug Review #8

2013-06-23 Thread Adam Williamson
# F19 Final Blocker Review meeting #8 # Date: 2013-06-24 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Time for one last (hopefully!) F19 Final push - we have just a couple of proposed blockers to look at right now, and three accepted blockers to

[Bug 972110] abi-compliance-checker-1.99.1 is available

2013-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972110 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pkgdiff-1.6-1.fc18

[Bug 967783] abi-compliance-checker-1.99 is available

2013-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967783 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-1.99

[Bug 959206] gcc-c++ should be set as Requires

2013-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959206 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|abi-compliance-checker-1.99

File Future-0.14.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Future: af14e85d07c84a0ecf2c24ef519da334 Future-0.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Mojolicious-4.16.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious: 2a495bdfd3b06725c0dad027dd658822 Mojolicious-4.16.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File URI-FromHash-0.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-URI-FromHash: 2034041b86ac2a71fb7b488d6f0370f8 URI-FromHash-0.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Future] Update to 0.14

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit dc64c90e4daf03609f92965dd364b151046bda97 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 23 11:12:36 2013 +0200 Update to 0.14 .gitignore |1 + perl-Future.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff

[perl-Mojolicious] Update to 4.16

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 2a5cb5de98aad4eb4b0553e913fbbf563daf664f Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 23 11:16:30 2013 +0200 Update to 4.16 .gitignore|1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2

[perl-URI-FromHash] Update to 0.04

2013-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 664f9c33f5ca087dec64827649b0298e71bfee79 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr Date: Sun Jun 23 11:24:17 2013 +0200 Update to 0.04 .gitignore |1 + perl-URI-FromHash.spec | 10 +++--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-06-23 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-06-23 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2013-06-23 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-06-23 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-06-23 Thread buildsys
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite) perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq) On i386: perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires

[Bug 971096] CVE-2013-2145 perl-Module-Signature: arbitrary code execution when verifying SIGNATURE

2013-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096 Bug 971096 depends on bug 971099, which changed state. Bug 971099 Summary: CVE-2013-2145 perl-Module-Signature: arbitrary code execution when verifying SIGNATURE [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971099 What

[Bug 971096] CVE-2013-2145 perl-Module-Signature: arbitrary code execution when verifying SIGNATURE

2013-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Signature-0.73-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are