Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>
> Maybe, true but I doubt that simpler set of rules, that never get
> audited, written by inexperienced users are more secure than "complex"
> rules in FirewallD which at last had chance to be
On 09/17/2013 06:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for
I am no longer able to dedicate the time that the plone and zope packages
need to be able to run on Fedora. I am orphaning these packages as of today
and hope another community member is able to pick them up.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:06:42PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
> xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
> the stand-alone package xorriso bundles a bunch of libraries.
It is now block
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
> > summary of what I'm doing:
>
> While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:52:51PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
>
> >I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
> >were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
>
> >autotrust
>
> >They might also lack a dead.package, but I will
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8737
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12680
--
Hello guys,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
the stand-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-0d256e64 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-3f256e56 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
http://dl
I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:30 PM, David Timms wrote:
> In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
> an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
> upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
> on the builder ?
>
> Does
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
autotrust
They might also lack a dead.package, but I will write a separate mail
about this.
Indeed. fixed. (autotools was merged int
In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
on the builder ?
Does the build system keep the build logs of old packages, ie that sho
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2013-09-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Go/No-Go #2 will be on this Thursday, so it's time for what will
hopefully be the last last blocker review meeting for F20 alpha.
We'll be runni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1008300
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Bug ID: 1009094
Summary: RFE: Upgrade F18's perl-Try-Tiny to >= 0.12
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Try-Tiny
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter: rc040...@fre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
There's a buildroot override in place for this too.
koji wait-repo f18-build --build=perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
5cc9e37... Update to 0.12 (documentation fixes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hi,
I'd like to retire the python-jinja package, containing the Jinja1
template engine, which has been superseded by Jinja2 for a very long
time. Jinja2 is packaged as python-jinja2 in Fedora.
However, there's one package left that depends on it: olpc-library.
Can anyone comment on the status of
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler:
fd04ee3f4c2164b7f7909d85f11e467a Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
> summary of what I'm doing:
While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have
noticed all 3 of the following:
- ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
- Excl
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I'd be quite happy if someone would take perl-IO-AIO off my hands. My only
> interest in it is as an (optional) backend and test dependency of
> perl-AnyEvent, which I co-maintain - I picked it up when a previous
> maintainer orphaned it.
>
> I
What a mess! I sure do seem to be attracted to bundled library issues, like
insects are attracted to shiny lights. :-(
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:03:48 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>> I adopted libeio back when Node.js still bundled it
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time a
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
> In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
>
> 1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/120
On 17.09.2013 15:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> P J P wrote:
>> Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
>> than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
>
> +1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
> Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
> >
> > This still doesn't boot. (We're
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1209703/
2. xulrunner seen 10191 times (6% of all reports)
https://retrace
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 16:43 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> You definitely need the fsync before doing the fiemap.
> We saw this on certain file systems including ext4 when adding
> fiemap support (efficient reading of holes) to cp.
> This is a bug in the fiemap interface IMHO in that it returns
> fa
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 12:24 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:31:22AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Other things like reading from remot
Dennis Gilmore writes:
> [...] Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for
> stable Fedora's [...]
Can this be mechanically enforced?
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://f
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for stable
> Fedora's we have no way to remove them and If you retire it they will
> be in a weird state where the package will be in the repos and
> available to install but koji will say its blocked. It will create
> con
P J P wrote:
> Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
> than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
+1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out of my way to disable that "feature"
immediately af
On 09/15/2013 08:52 PM, P J P wrote:
Why are there so many chains? Most are empty. Those which have rules, jump
from one chain to another and that jumps to yet another.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907375#c2
Multicast DNS is allowed in the internal network(chain IN_internal_all
> > ABRT provides per component customization.
> >
> > https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#component-specific-bugzilla-bug-formatting
>
> Excellent. Given that almost no packages are shipping these, is there
> any guideline or guidance how to do so? Just add them to our packages?
> Anything we
On 09/16/2013 11:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Jakub Filak wrote:
I wonder if someday it would make sense to customize this per user?
Possibly too much complexity...
kevin
ABRT provides per component customization.
https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#
On 17.09.2013 12:31, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>>> connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>>> network nam
Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>>connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>>network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkMa
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha.
This is the second attempt to release Fedora 20 Alpha.
Thursday, September 19, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public relea
On 09/17/2013 11:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
and for net
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:26:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > >
> > > > For example if you use mutt then all
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
>and for network "CoffeShowHotSpot" one assigns Public z
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
>
> This still doesn't boot. (We're working on it.)
Matt,
any news on this?
Thanks
Jaroslav
> --
> Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
> --
>
Hi Mateusz,
- Original Message -
> From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>
> Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
> connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
> network named "MyHomeNet" one can associa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008407
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1008856
--
You are receiving this
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 00:04 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
> I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer.
>
> The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedo
commit 413aa8a8f28b9394106c9d4587cde1aeae3ebc34
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Tue Sep 17 10:14:50 2013 +0200
New version 64 (#1008403)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-NumSeq.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
dif
On 16.09.2013 07:55, P J P wrote:
>Hello Tomasz,
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Tomasz Torcz
>> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>> You seem to have missed this Fedora *18* feature:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default
>> firewall-cmd is supposed to isol
53 matches
Mail list logo
