On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:05:21PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
As all such schemes it works as long as you ignore the fact that apps
process data and communicate with other apps.
That's not being overlooked. Probably the presentation already addresses
this concern.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026715
Bug ID: 1026715
Summary: perl-Test-Class-0.40 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Class
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:19:48PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I disagree with the premise that to get anywhere, we would need to bend over
backwards to the proprietary market and adopt their inferior software
distribution strategies. If that were true, we could give up right here,
we'd have
Łukasz Trąbiński wrote:
when i boot machines with many ethernet devices I got
random number ethX. Once eth0 is eth0, after reboot eth0 is eth1.
After again boot eth1 is eth1 and so on.
I had a problem like that, which began when I upgraded to Fedora 17. I
worked around it by writing these Udev
Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 23:02, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
The problem is not to get code in the hands of developers. You don't need
distros for that. The problem is to get the code to end-users and
developers spend more time fighting the constrains it involves than trying
to understand this
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 23:02, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
The problem is not to get code in the hands of developers. You don't need
distros for that. The problem is to get the code to end-users and
developers
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 23:02, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
The problem is not to get code in the hands of developers. You don't need
distros for that. The problem is to get the code to end-users and
developers
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:53:15 +0100
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on what you mean by power user (I hate this meaningless
term) if it means software developer then
yes. If it means someone that spends his whole day in config
dialogs then no.
Maybe?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:53:15 +0100
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on what you mean by power user (I hate this meaningless
term) if it means software developer then
yes. If it means someone that spends his whole
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:35:30 +0100
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
And if that is the case, there is a huge disconnect between GNOME
goals and Fedora Workstation goals. GNOME speakers repeat all year
round their software is not aimed at power users, but developers
are the
Compose started at Tue Nov 5 09:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (2013-11-01 13:52:31)
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:09:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Fri, Nov
Thank I will try this solution and i will try catch ooops from kernel.
2013/11/5 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se
Łukasz Trąbiński wrote:
when i boot machines with many ethernet devices I got
random number ethX. Once eth0 is eth0, after reboot eth0 is eth1.
After again boot eth1
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Right, because that's a model for success that shouldn't be either
emulated or improved upon, it's better for each little fiefdom's paradise
to erect walls to ensure cross influence isn't happening.
Your insulting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026708
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Reporter:
e36fc3c25a71b2ceba2ae21c6a2e02fc Test-Reporter-1.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 00647923a7b0a583abb8f1b9513d6d8d83ffd35c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 5 14:37:26 2013 +0100
1.60 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Reporter.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026716
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fixing release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop Live, and the 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
Beta RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-afcc94c6 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-a5cd95cc : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
monnerat:BADURL:openca-ocspd-1.5.1-rc1.tar.gz:ocspd
The URL is not available anymore.
I've just packaged 1.9.0 for rawhide/f20/f19/f18. It is not the latest
version, but it's the latest that doesn't use libpki. I've submitted a
review request for this library, but nobody
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:29:35AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
I started working on updating python3 to 3.4.0. So far, this is only in
a private branch python3.4 in dist-git, since I'll need to get a Change
approved for Fedora 21. I already created the Change [1], but I was told
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 15:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
The other
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 15:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at
The term 'Power user' is not meaningless if you use it to refer to users of
Fedora on IBM Power architecture ;)
But apart from that I do agree that the term as generally used doesn't provide
a very clear target for development.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: drago01
commit 7842d063cfab19f636149dbe69bf86ca062ce41a
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 5 16:37:13 2013 +0100
0.4008 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
Summary of changes:
dd82ca2... Update to 1.001002 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Simple-1.001002-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
dd82ca2... Update to 1.001002
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Simple-1.001002-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
dd82ca2... Update to 1.001002
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Ryan,
I been discussing the possibilities of doing some surveys with Langdon White,
so hopefully yes.
We just need to rustle up the budget first :)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lerch rle...@redhat.com
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 08:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such
issues -
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I think it is a very bad idea to try to explicitly and officially support
third-party software, especially proprietary third-party software.
The thing is, making third-party software easier to maintain and
deploy will in
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 08:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Adam Williamson
awill...@redhat.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't
Am 05.11.2013 17:22, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
Look at all the software that has been written for GTK1 and obsolete
libraries that hasn't been ported and therefore no longer runs on
Fedora. Wouldn't it have been nice to continue to have a practical
option to use that software, even if it
The Printing Test Day for Fedora 20 is today.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-11-05_Printing
This test day is for testing all aspects of printing, including setting
up the printer, sharing printers on the network, and printing jobs.
The changes in Fedora 20 are relatively minor:
Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for Fedora? I
checked the netbeans package, which was last built for fc17.
Is there any technical or license reason for this or is just nobody packing it
right now?
--ManuelFaux
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote:
Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for Fedora? I
checked the netbeans package, which was last built for fc17.
Is there any technical or license reason for this or is just nobody
packing it right now?
Someone
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 12:35 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 23:02, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
The problem is not to get code in the hands of developers. You don't need
distros for that. The problem is to get the code to end-users and
developers spend more time fighting
On 11/05/2013 09:46 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Someone from Sun used to be the maintainer and noone is doing it right
now. No technical or licensing issues if anyone is interested in
packaging it afaik.
I've been loving using netbeans however I've been using the upstream
package.. I looked
Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55)
Hi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote:
Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for Fedora? I
checked the netbeans package, which was last built for fc17.
Is there any technical or license reason for
On Fri 18 Oct 2013 17:59:31 Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 17:56:57 Barry Scott wrote:
I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not
build
on F19.
cd . env
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-11-05)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:02:38 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Hi All,
This review is new proposal to implement CI test cases inside 389-DS.
The layout of the tests will be:
head/dirsrvtests/
tickets/
ticket_abc_test.py
ticket_xyz_test.py
...
finalizer
testsuites/
acl_test.py
Hello everyone.
I'm searching for volunteers willing to review the prboom-plus engine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Anybody want to help with that?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--
Jaromir Capik
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
Software Engineer / Secondary Arch
Email:
Hi!
I would like to invite all of you who are interested in helping defining
the scope (i.e. what we will do document) of the Environments and
stacks WG to join the discussion [0] at our new env-and-stacks mailing
list [1]. If you have an idea/expectation/suggestion, please write it
up.
We
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:21:15AM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
I think this is a pretty good starting point for our development
direction, and sets the stage for us making positive progress in the
new working group model.
I do think we should keep it open to tweaks in the future as things
play
hi
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetBeans_7.3 (should be update)
problem(s):
- latest NB releases use some libraries available in java8 e.g.
https://github.com/furosys/nashorn
Nashorn for Java 7 https://bitbucket.org/ramonza/nashorn-backport (used by
NB)
Il 05/11/2013 18:56, Jaromir Capik ha scritto:
Hello everyone.
I'm searching for volunteers willing to review the prboom-plus engine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517
Anybody want to help with that?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--
Jaromir Capik
Red Hat Czech,
Hi,
- Original Message -
We should be enabling the user to get the things
done he/she cares about, not forcing them to learn the things we care
about.
There should be no You must be this tall to ride Fedora Workstation
signs.
[...snip...]
Is it the intent that the
Hi All,
Here's the second draft of the charter. I think I captured most of
the discussion to date, but there's always a chance I missed
something. Please read this over and provide any feedback you have.
Please pay particular attention to the (NOTE:) items.
Thanks.
josh
== Fedora Workstation
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
- What about watching films, listening to music? I think it is a basic
requirement for students (at least for me).
Maybe we should add a that a student should be able to play videos and
listen to music. It should be easy to install
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
- What about watching films, listening to music? I think it is a basic
requirement for students (at least for me).
Maybe we should add a that a student should
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
- What about watching films, listening to music? I think it is a basic
requirement for
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:13 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:03:45 +0100
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Apps shipping from upstream direcly does not have to be closed
source. Firefox for instance
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 21:03 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
that's all true but you can be pretty sure
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:15 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux
Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent
environment. Let it be 10, 100 or 1000 different packages but
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a
working title and indicative of the conversation at Flock. Peter Jones had
suggested
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:44:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Promote as the Proper Way To Get Apps On GNOME / Fedora Desktop would
NOT be great. Having spent a lot of time thinking about both sides of
the debate I'm still firmly in the 'coherent distribution is the ideal
state' camp.
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:04 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:44:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Promote as the Proper Way To Get Apps On GNOME / Fedora Desktop would
NOT be great. Having spent a lot of time thinking about both sides of
the debate I'm still firmly
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 21:03 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
bad outcome as low as possible. Let's just try it and see what
happens! is not a mature approach to risk management.
Ehr, instead of promoting something as supported, just start off slow.
Call if alpha, write down all the
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 23:50 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 04 novembre 2013 à 21:02 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
that's all true but you can be pretty sure if
I just took a look at making AppData xml files for the packages I
maintain. I started with the alphabetically first one (why not?):
abe. Here is my first attempt:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
application
id type=desktopabe.desktop/id
licenceCC0/licence
summaryAbe's Amazing
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 15:23 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
- What about watching films, listening to music? I think it is a basic
requirement for students (at least
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 15:23 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
- What about watching films,
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 22:15 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
bad outcome as low as possible. Let's just try it and see what
happens! is not a mature approach to risk management.
Ehr, instead of promoting something as supported,
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 15:23 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22
Hi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I would like that too, to be clear. That is why I used the term
upstream distribution and not the term sandboxed apps. Sandboxing is
a desirable technology for both upstream and centralized distribution,
I am not sure that is a good
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:15 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux
Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent
environment. Let it be 10, 100 or
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Right, that's exactly what I was saying. I just think this is all the
_original poster_ was talking about, not any kind of automatic
configuration of such repositories. (Or at least, you can read it that
way).
OK. I guess that's
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 13:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
If
distros move away from the gospel of centralized distribution
Some people working on technologies in this area may have that as a
goal, but I think it's absolutely crucial to continue to support the
package model of application
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I just took a look at making AppData xml files for the packages I
maintain. I started with the alphabetically first one (why not?):
abe. Here is my first attempt:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
application
id
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/08/how-to-take-169-screenshots/
I was confused until I got to the comments. :-) Thanks for the
pointer. That cleared things up for me. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I would actually like to go a little further, and make it easy to enable
'clean' third-party repositories. If we imagine a future where e.g.
valve is hosting a repository with their steam client, or say, the
chromium web browser is available from the a fedora people
Matthew Miller wrote:
I really would like all my desktop applications to run in a sandbox,
whether they come from upstream directly or from us.
Why? This artificially restricts what your applications can do and also
hurts performance. It doesn't buy us anything other than problems! And what
I wrote:
So now after the good balance, you bring up the Change with a capital
'C' (plagiarized from Barack Obama). Can you please cut down on the
buzzword-loaden rhetoric bullshit?
PS: Since it has been pointed out to me that it can be misunderstood as
such, please don't take this as a rant
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Right, that's exactly what I was saying. I just think this is all the
_original poster_ was talking about, not any kind of automatic
configuration of such
drago01 wrote:
Depends on what you mean by power user (I hate this meaningless
term) if it means software developer then
yes. If it means someone that spends his whole day in config dialogs
then no.
A power user is somebody experienced with computers who uses them regularly
and who wants to
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the
various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees
we want to offer? I'll stop short of paraphrasing you.
The fact that bundling is even being explored as a technique at all
Simo Sorce wrote:
* and *ideally* I mean SELinux sanbdboxed with specific APIs that must
be used to interact with the rest of the system, so that the application
doesn't have free reign over users files.
So you want to remove my freedom to disable SELinux? SARCASMWay to go…
/SARCASM
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Look at all the software that has been written for GTK1 and obsolete
libraries that hasn't been ported and therefore no longer runs on
Fedora. Wouldn't it have been nice to continue to have a practical
option to use that software, even if it doesn't integrate that well
Olav Vitters wrote:
Various concerns have been raised. Just write them down, make a plan to
address them, done.
But many of those concerns are inherent to the concept of sandboxed
applications or the methods of delivery they'd enable and cannot possibly
be addressed, ever. The whole concept
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:26
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:52 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:23:01PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
So let me step into my handy Tardis and bring back a vignette from the
Real World after Fedora and other distributions bless upstream app
distribution as a preferred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
Beta RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-c3e3bbaa : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-d3e2baba : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
Hi,
drago01 already answered your screenshot question, but...
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:25 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
I just took a look at making AppData xml files for the packages I
maintain. I started with the alphabetically first one (why not?):
abe. Here is my first attempt:
?xml
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 11:19 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 08:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't think we'd
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
drago01 already answered your screenshot question, but...
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:25 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
I just took a look at making AppData xml files for the packages I
maintain. I started with
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 20:14 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:25 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
application
id type=desktopabe.desktop/id
I'm pretty sure it
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
* and *ideally* I mean SELinux sanbdboxed with specific APIs that must
be used to interact with the rest of the system, so that the application
doesn't have free reign over users files.
So you want to remove my
On Nov 4, 2013 12:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
- My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last
Il 05/11/2013 18:59, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
hi
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetBeans_7.3 (should be update)
problem(s):
- latest NB releases use some libraries available in java8 e.g.
https://github.com/furosys/nashorn
Nashorn for Java 7
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-11-06 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026704
Bug ID: 1026704
Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL-4.025 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026705
Bug ID: 1026705
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.82 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026708
Bug ID: 1026708
Summary: perl-IPC-Cmd-0.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IPC-Cmd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026711
Bug ID: 1026711
Summary: perl-Module-Build-0.4008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Build
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026716
Bug ID: 1026716
Summary: perl-Test-Reporter-1.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Reporter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
