The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
567
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
81
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
57
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
567
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
81
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
42
Compose started at Sat Nov 9 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an OSGi 5
specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
specification, whose license is not compatible with Fedora, as far as I
know (http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks).
Is there any OSGi 5
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
So it does! My mistake.
Though I do hesitate to not run it past FESCo first. They're
intimately involved in several areas, and that is the group that the
WG liaisons ... liaise to. Getting a FESCo ack would probably go a
long way
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:21:34 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
So it does! My mistake.
Though I do hesitate to not run it past FESCo first. They're
intimately involved in several areas, and that is the group
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:16:08PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
I cannot login with the user 'fedora'. I'm connected to the console (it is a
CloudStack cloud), and have tried all combinations of ec2-user/fedora
/passwords/without-passwords.
You've solved it, but for reference
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
For bonus points, we ought to tell file and rpmlint about the new bytecode
format for .pyc files.
rpmlint 1.5 already knows the 3.4 bytecode magic value, but an old
one. Fixed/updated in git:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
let me introduce Copr:
This seems like a good message to go to
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, especially with all the traffic here
these days. Maybe you could resend, or else wait a little while until you
feel like it's a
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 04:55:32PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
I have recently joined the Red Hat Security Technologies Team,
and will help co-maintain the gnutls and nettle packages.
Hi, and welcome. Glad to have you on board and contributing to Fedora!
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with
my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a
particular set of packages (minimal install, or some variant thereof)
does not
[Apologies for late replies to a long, wandering thread. I've been at a
confernece and am just catching up.]
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 08:47:44AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Where's the benefit of creating a handful of workgroups that now
have some sort of power over the distribution? After
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:45:46PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't really have a problem in believing that but it would be useful to
know in more detail how the initial proposals came to be (who were
involved? what problems are we trying to solve? what are failures of the
current model?
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:16:08PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
I cannot login with the user 'fedora'. I'm connected to the console (it is
a CloudStack cloud), and have tried all combinations of ec2-user/fedora
/passwords/without-passwords.
Oh hey. I missed that this was in CloudStack --
Hi
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
I did discuss the idea with my manager (Denise Dumas, Director of Platform
Engineering) to make sure she would support me in spending time developing
it. She has promised (including to everyone at Flock) to provide resources
where we
Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
snip
But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which is
unacceptable!
Just don't use GNOME? More seriously, this is the bug with the
instructions on how to write the terminal chooser patch for glib:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
No, we want to move to a forum where the working group members have a
chance to discuss things without being drowned out by 100+ mails/day
from you. The other working groups are doing the same on their
respective mailing lists.
And of course the problem is the person
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is
an application
is by looking for a .desktop file. So in theory you
Il 09/11/2013 15:25, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an OSGi 5
specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
specification, whose license is not compatible with Fedora, as far as I
know
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:04:17 +0100
punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 09/11/2013 15:25, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an
OSGi 5 specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
specification, whose license is
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 22:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something
is an
Am 10.11.2013 01:35, schrieb Les Howell:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 22:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
level and not a package level. The current
On 9 November 2013 21:47, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On i386:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On armhfp:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017577
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Perl-Critic-Lax-0.010-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023710
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026013
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DB_File-1.830-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022678
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Math-NumSeq-66-1.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010057
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016248
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Object-InsideOut-3.98-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914295
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-8.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017576
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.015-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026219
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026067
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026218
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MIME-Lite-3.030-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014197
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Getopt-Long-2.42-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017482
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-9-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914310
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Padre-0.90-10.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914307
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PDL-2.6.0.90-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828221
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993353
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026220
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|or...@cora.nwra.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014206
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-threads-1.89-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023400
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-lib-abs-0.93-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023711
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-Table-1.128-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016246
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Math-NumSeq-65-1.fc19
61 matches
Mail list logo
