The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
574
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
49
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
574
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
89
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
65
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
I didn't see that Equinox satisfies the OSGi 5 part, since I didn't
use this package anymore, as soon I recognized that NetBeans does
not build with it.
Is this still true? I know that jtulach(one of
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
I didn't see that
While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
installation tool), hooks for getting command line tools to pop up as
GUI icons and behavior correctly,
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message
Compose started at Sun Nov 17 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
On 17 November 2013 04:33, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:11PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Oh, hey, look. That place is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know
where to put this' dumping ground for GNOME 3, isn't it?
It has been there since 3.0 AFAIK, so
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:25:17 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Manuel Faux wrote:
I little bit more feedback would be welcome.
You don't agree to give the option to manually download the file at
all, or don't you agree with NOT packing the file
to /usr/lib/jvm/...?
On 17.11.2013 14:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
...
So step back, and let's think how can we make
Compose started at Sun Nov 17 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
Great! I appreciate any and all input.
Regards,
Jeff
On 11/16/2013 08:06 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
This package is in my plan, I will help do an *informal* review.
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 3:33:40 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message
Hi,
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I
maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
which caused the .desktop file to get installed to
/usr/share/applications/%{name}.desktop/%{name}.desktop
I fixed
Hi,
I bumped glew in 1.10 in rawhide, I haven't rebuilt all the dependencies but I
can if anyone wants, but I thought I'd give
a headsup to the maintainers so they can rebuild their packages.
Dave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
which caused the .desktop file to get installed to
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
which caused the .desktop file to
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain,
i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
Am 17.11.2013 22:12, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain,
i.e.
On 17.11.2013 22:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:12, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect
If you don't want to do mass rebuild, maybe you should send this email
directly to the owners of glew dependent packages, so they don't miss
it. Especially when the traffic on devel is so high.
Ne 17. listopad 2013, 21:48:31 CET, David Airlie napsal:
Hi,
I bumped glew in 1.10 in rawhide, I
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:33:09PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 05:33 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:11PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Oh, hey, look. That place is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know
where to put this' dumping ground
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64
however fails with
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/applications/xflr5.desktop from install of
xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from
Actually I feel guilty now, I'll do a mass rebuild in rawhide.
amanith-0.3-26.fc20.src.rpm
avogadro-1.0.3-20.fc21.src.rpm
blender-2.69-1.fc21.src.rpm
bzflag-2.4.2-7.fc20.src.rpm
calligra-2.7.4-2.fc21.src.rpm
cegui06-0.6.2-15.fc20.src.rpm
cegui-0.7.9-5.fc20.src.rpm
If you haven't done it yet, skip openscad and opencsg, I've rebuilt
those once I read your email.
Po 18. listopad 2013, 01:39:00 CET, David Airlie napsal:
Actually I feel guilty now, I'll do a mass rebuild in rawhide.
amanith-0.3-26.fc20.src.rpm
avogadro-1.0.3-20.fc21.src.rpm
- Original Message -
From: Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, 18 November, 2013 10:54:38 AM
Subject: Re: glew 1.10 in rawhide
If you haven't done it yet, skip openscad and opencsg, I've
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 07:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
installation tool), hooks for getting
Hi owners,
I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop changes,
Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
something else.
Dave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
/usr/share/xsession.
Interesting, when I looking into more window manager in Fedora, I found that:
openbox installs desktop file to /usr/share/xsessions
pekwm installs desktop
Il 18/11/2013 04:13, David Airlie ha scritto:
Hi owners,
I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop changes,
Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
something else.
Dave.
hi
Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
can you please
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile?
regards
gil
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=479029:
Checking for libhdfs ...
Il 18/11/2013 04:40, Christopher Meng ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile?
regards
gil
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-11-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We're into Final validation already,
so that's the main topic.
- Original Message -
From: punto...@libero.it
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, 18 November, 2013 1:54:06 PM
Subject: Re: root rebuild failed after glew update
Il 18/11/2013 04:40, Christopher Meng ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it
On 11/18/2013 01:23 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
/usr/share/xsession.
Interesting, when I looking into more window manager in Fedora, I found that:
openbox installs desktop
mån 2013-11-18 klockan 04:26 +0100 skrev punto...@libero.it:
Il 18/11/2013 04:13, David Airlie ha scritto:
Hi owners,
I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop
changes,
Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
something
commit 8066adff94c52c4fc26c2dfd5132d500f3b3d455
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 17 09:13:34 2013 +0100
Update to 1.04
.gitignore |1 +
...-hash-ordering-bug-in-what-I-think-is-CGI.patch | 32
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback:
e205460a9344207047d77350a238882e Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8f829f907319d1cca1a27263e38c1c07a28bb821
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 17 09:18:59 2013 +0100
Update to 0.07
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
9ed3e4fbee5ad7fa2805d2d27cafe7d9 Mojolicious-4.57.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c7c9aba8527935c9e30c5a32ea308bdec61ca664
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 17 09:30:42 2013 +0100
Update to 4.57
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Software-License:
14522397d2b34562b3a30be9e411267f Software-License-0.103008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 001cbe8fd092096aa3a5437cff3876bd0c38063b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Nov 17 12:37:50 2013 +
Update to 0.103008
- New upstream release 0.103008
- Faster!
- Add new_from_short_name to LicenseUtils for spdx.org-style short names
-
Summary of changes:
001cbe8... Update to 0.103008 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031298
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Software-License-0.103008-1.fc20' was created
pointing to:
001cbe8... Update to 0.103008
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Software-License-0.103008-1.fc21' was created
pointing to:
001cbe8... Update to 0.103008
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
52 matches
Mail list logo
