The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
583
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
98
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
40
WG meeting will be today at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
== Open Floor ==
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first option.)
Thanks, Mikolaj.
On 26.11.2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not require exact maching binary rpm
Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not require exact maching binary rpm
Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Alex GS wrote:
I'm a computer science major interested in Linux software engineering and
just beginning to learn programming so I'm use-case #1 and #2. Currently
out of all my peers I'm the only one using Linux as far as I know. Most
students and developers even those working on Linux
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is kind of why I keep coming back to: Why do we have
python-django at all? I don't really see any reason why we shouldn't
kill off the python-django package and just carry
Compose started at Tue Nov 26 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
On 26.11.2013 11:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
for
example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
Debug info RPMs do not require exact
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
Ant or Gradle.
On 26.11.2013 11:50, Christopher Meng wrote:
Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM?
It is just a proof of concept/idea. Will hardly be implemented like
this, if something similar is going to be implemented.
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/21/2013 08:57 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
These two steps make it rather non-simple; one would also determine
which parts of the code base have not been exercised.
If the test suite is so weak that it doesn't cover such basic issues,
you will have trouble with *any* change, not just this
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is kind of why I keep coming back to: Why do we have
python-django at all? I don't really see any reason why we shouldn't
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:07:55AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hey,
recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
the corresponding bug is [1].
As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
at least
- python-django-openstack-auth
-
Hello,
On 16 November 2013 02:09, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Simone Caronni wrote:
Bareos is currently in standby following some legal issues:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#Bareos
Can we know what the issues are? Switching would look like a no-brainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is kind of why I keep coming back
tflink added a comment.
yeah, one of them was supposed to be for upgradepath. Can you change the title
of one of them depending on which task you were intending to take?
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T16
To: jskladan, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink, jskladan
=
#fedora-meeting: (2013-11-26)
=
Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:00:25 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-26/environment_and_stacks.2013-11-26-13.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 08:59 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500,
Dne 24.11.2013 00:34, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
There is pros and cons of each.
Agreed. And therefore forcing someone to use one of them or cricitice
someone for having Fedora project on Github is something I don't like.
Unless it's a proper policy and if such policy is proposed I would be
Hi everyone.
As i've been having a few discussions myself and following several of
them as well as plans about release cycles in the different WGs over the
past weeks and after FESCO discussed this in during their meetings and
in a FESCO ticket[1] i get the feeling that we should be
#438: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label
---+-
Reporter: kparal| Owner: mkrizek
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: minor |
On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
As i've been having a few discussions myself and following several of
them as well as plans about release cycles in the different WGs over
the past weeks and after FESCO discussed this in during their meetings
and in a FESCO ticket[1]
26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy.
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired
Summary of changes:
51e5db9... Update to 1.4.2. (*)
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
51e5db9... Update to 1.4.2. (*)
b40cc69... Update to 1.4.3 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi fedora ! Im reviving this thread about vagrant images.
I'd like to use packer.io to build vagrant images as part of the fedora builds.
I assume this means first we will need vagrant and packer packeged in fedora?
Or does fedora
allow the use of nonpackaged utilities to build
At the KDE SIG meeting today, we made the hard decision to push
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
change/feature back to f21. There were simply too many sddm-related
blocker issues that would not be safely resolvable in time for f20 release.
As such, effective
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Need-to-add-locking-around-config-area-.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets
Hi all,
as the Fedora 20 schedule[1] states the Final change freeze is upon
us. As of now only updates that fix an accepted Final Blocker bug or
Freeze exception will be allowed in.
we are at the post beta stage of release, so the Pre-release[3]
stage of the updates policy applies.
Regards
#359: Create Ansible Playbooks for Deployment and Updating
---+-
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 09:31 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 08:59 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/2013 08:34 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 12:02 +0100, Matthias Runge
Simone Caronni wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html
Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of
the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims the community
version is not dead. (Is that credible?) (He
Sandro Mani wrote:
[1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepackage.spec
Yeah, that hack looks like it could work, sorta. If you have multiple
subpackages installed, having only one subpackage of the correct version and
the others of wrong versions will still be satisfying the dependency in the
26.11.2013 20:00, punto...@libero.it пишет:
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:39:38 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Here is a quick and dirty spec implementing the idea I described:
[1]. From what I can see it behaves correctly with any combination
of packages and subpackages installed. Am I missing something?
[1]
Il 26/11/2013 20:57, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 20:00, punto...@libero.it пишет:
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
26.11.2013 15:06,punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
W dniu 25.11.2013
Hi,
Per the unresponsive package maintainers policy, I've opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029728 .
It has now been two weeks with no response, so I'm posting to the list to ask
if anyone knows how to contact Chitlesh.
Thanks.
-Ben
--
devel mailing list
On 26.11.2013 19:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
[1] http://smani.fedorapeople.org/somepackage.spec
Yeah, that hack looks like it could work, sorta. If you have multiple
subpackages installed, having only one subpackage of the correct version and
the others of wrong versions will
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2013-11-27
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Freeze is now upon us and tomorrow (2013-11-27)
we'll be having another Blocker Review Meeting for Fedora 20.
There's plenty to review this time
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop and LXDE Lives are over their respective size
limits.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:8 .
Check this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
Check this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
The review is being done here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456. He needs to be
sponsored first! Any takers?
--
Arun S A G
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-XSpp:
c44ad3281df81319d02833a4e42282ac ExtUtils-XSpp-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a271c30fd6a154a9110f1ff955d37b223334cbe0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 09:30:21 2013 +0100
0.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec | 46 --
sources |2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033066
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032078
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-IsDev:
5645c9006031cc1fed8dce70095e312e Path-IsDev-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 177d5ee5b57b300e6930ff20a5613672a31bd5d7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:05:55 2013 +0100
1.02 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Path-IsDev.spec | 16
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033066
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI:
396afa921d7ce76aa3a5dc4ff744bf3d CGI.pm-3.64.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6eb8dc39ade1bca3376aac09ebf4609b8c25a70a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:31:45 2013 +0100
3.64 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-CGI.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
commit cd2c1389969deab7ecf4e8b6743c32f41176486b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:32:13 2013 +0100
Remove old Obsoletes statement
perl-CGI.spec |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI.spec b/perl-CGI.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is pure bug-fixing release suitable for F≥19.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit b2955478bf117f1d2407647ef294ec0aa0e98b47
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:31:45 2013 +0100
3.64 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-CGI.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit efb4598c1cb3120a79a191dee421a935fc1ad2df
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 24 16:19:44 2013 +0200
Update dependencies and license
perl-CGI.spec | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI.spec
commit 8c74715f4dc03fdedbd2440e384c95a1a81d1a5a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:31:45 2013 +0100
3.64 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-CGI.spec | 14 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034099
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.64-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-3.64-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.64-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-3.64-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor:
5c5dea74f00ad37c5119dd22b28a5563 Class-XSAccessor-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cc7956de59114ab754f7c43cbab710f5f53ce6db
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 11:06:31 2013 +0100
1.19 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec | 18 +-
sources|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034104
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034099
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3:
87f6fa1231a878ca6b3beed88eb8ece7 ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1dda88963a6ff36fb962ee7410891089fd5f0b25
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Tue Nov 26 10:19:56 2013 +
Update to version 1.14
.gitignore|1 +
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Markdown:
1d485b736ec62127748b65b2d6866f31 Pod-Markdown-1.500.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6b9d90790251722b326c1024a72c114c0d44ede1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 12:13:40 2013 +0100
1.500 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-Pod-Markdown.spec | 24 +---
sources|2 +-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034104
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit b9497b8d780a54ff5be6661c5f24d70135e0bb79
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 14:08:09 2013 +0100
Document the Storable and encryption is not secure
...urity-notice-on-Storable-and-reply-attack.patch | 105
perl-PlRPC.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Readonly:
875c911ed43d0ecf2c5abed60ee6ae18 Readonly-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 63844185cea5650895489e8d5a27101fea1d6e9e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 26 14:33:11 2013 +0100
Add a security warning about use of RPC::PlClient
DBI-1.630-Security-notice-for-Proxy.patch | 55 +
perl-DBI.spec
commit a342c6972eeadba1d6800c4c5c35d8bec2ca3f1d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 13:44:21 2013 +
Update to 1.04
- New upstream release 1.04
- Module now maintained by Sanko Robinson; please see TODO for a possible
set
of changes to this
The lightweight tag 'perl-Readonly-1.04-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
a342c69... Update to 1.04
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetPacket:
9ca7dfe00957a3bcb54f3bb10671eaef NetPacket-1.4.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
37e02a0f553beff38869d2fa308860db IO-Socket-SSL-1.961.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b40cc695ab480c4198299ef09c356c1c349477e7
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:55:03 2013 +
Update to 1.4.3
.gitignore |1 +
perl-NetPacket.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
commit c150007ab90652e50ea3fcfb5ff8226115f941e1
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:55:35 2013 +
Update to 1.961
- New upstream release 1.961
- IO::Socket::SSL::Utils::CERT_create can now create CA-certificates that
are not self-signed (by
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-NumSeq:
734b315dc880865380c18d329af5c2ba Math-NumSeq-67.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 70843fc1a8b3d6ebc976a867da1c9f88ba290d6a
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Nov 26 17:13:31 2013 +0100
New version 67 (#1030911)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-NumSeq.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.961-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
c150007... Update to 1.961
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2a18677ffd7ad9b2c6b3bed076b400db9c151804
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Nov 26 17:19:12 2013 +0100
New version 111 (#1030912)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Math-PlanePath.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030911
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
commit cb12aa5c997cacfcafd448aba781c58029c2f699
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Nov 26 17:23:49 2013 +0100
New version 0.14 (#1014201)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp:
f3d6ad08127f62eed9baef131870f450 Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030912
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014201
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849703
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-245.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028949
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-245.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030907
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Archive-Extract-0.70-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031298
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031298
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Email-Send-2.199-2.fc1
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
