Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

2013-12-25 Thread Karel Volný
Hi, Dne pátek, 13. prosince 2013 17:42:24 CEST, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: ... Yeah, opt-in sounds like a much better idea. :-) Yeah, it does mean slower, but I think it's good to only have those things in

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2013-12-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 612 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 126 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 68

Re: AppData - how to properly handle them

2013-12-25 Thread Mattia Verga
Il 24/12/2013 03:06, Ankur Sinha ha scritto: On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 02:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: 1) Should the package with foo.appdata.xml require some package that owns /usr/share/appdata? (and do we have such package) It's OK to co-own the /usr/share/appdate directory

rawhide report: 20131225 changes

2013-12-25 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Dec 25 05:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10 LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10

Re: AppData - how to properly handle them

2013-12-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 09:34 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: /usr/share/appdata is owned by filesystem, so I think there's no need of co-own it for every single package, because filesystem is always installed for sure... Oh! What file system package is it owned by? -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur

Re: AppData - how to properly handle them

2013-12-25 Thread David Tardon
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:19:24PM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 09:34 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: /usr/share/appdata is owned by filesystem, so I think there's no need of co-own it for every single package, because filesystem is always installed for sure... Oh! What

Re: AppData - how to properly handle them

2013-12-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 17:13 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: Starting from filesystem-3.2-20 in Fedora 21 (rawhide) /usr/share/appdata is owned by that package. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=463704 Ah. OK. But in F19 and F20 there's currently no package that owns that

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-12-25 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi

2013-12-25 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-15.fc21.x86_64 requires libswipl.so.6.6.0()(64bit) On i386: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-15.fc21.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.6.0 On armhfp:

[Bug 1016253] perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540 is available

2013-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Rose-DateTime-0.540-1.

[Bug 1046506] New: Please upgrade perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C to 3.007

2013-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046506 Bug ID: 1046506 Summary: Please upgrade perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C to 3.007 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: perl-Mail-Box-Parser-C Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com