Il 05/01/2014 00:13, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 21:41 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2014-01-04 21:31, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/04/2014 08:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel difference (unfiled? )
I found 976704, closed with
Am 05.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Mattia Verga:
Il 05/01/2014 00:13, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 21:41 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2014-01-04 21:31, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/04/2014 08:56 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel
Am 05.01.2014 09:40, schrieb Reindl Harald:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
and that is clearly a regression
how likely is that somebody want to delete
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree.
The running kernel should not be
Il 05/01/2014 10:27, Lars E. Pettersson ha scritto:
Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree.
I agree in your disagreement! ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
why did they change remove into erase?
Yum actually offers both erase and remove for the same purpose. I
don't know which is an alias of the other, but rpm uses erase.
From the
On 01/05/2014 12:02 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
why did they change remove into erase?
Yum actually offers both erase and remove for the same purpose. I
don't know which is
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove
shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps erase was an afterthought,
to mimic the rpm behavior. If rpm has erase, and yum also can use
erase, perhaps
Am 05.01.2014 12:21, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove
shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps erase was an afterthought,
to mimic the rpm behavior. If rpm
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Bob Richmond b...@lorez.org wrote:
No, the EFL is distributed as one big tarball now. All the old releases
could be found here:
http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/
Starting with 1.8.0, they're distributed in:
Compose started at Sun Jan 5 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Bob Richmond b...@lorez.org wrote:
No, the EFL is distributed as one big tarball now. All the old releases
could be found here:
http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/
Starting with
On 01/02/2014 05:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing I
would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20 forces on me it
will be my main installation and forces me to choose between installing Grub on
On 05.01.2014 04:29, Bob Richmond wrote:
I have no desire to become a package maintainer for Enlightenment, but I
Even in this case, after the hard work already done by you, now it is
possible binaries be delivered to the end users - Are you aware of the
new COPR [1] service?
After repo
The autogen thing was because I patched configure.ac to look for the
pkg-config name for tslib as tslib-0.0 (as shipped in Fedora). Which
means configure needed to be regenerated. I guess an alternative would
be to patch configure directly, but eh... :)
On 01/05/2014 04:02 AM, Dan Mashal
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
Yes, I have read
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 12:34 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.01.2014 12:21, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove
shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
Am 05.01.2014 19:07, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way.
This is explained here:
On 01/05/2014 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase
kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?),
They
On 01/05/2014 07:24 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of
the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this is a
bug. I will file one.
Pressed send a bit too early. Should of course be 'erase' here, not
A solution may be for someone to write a plugin that restores the
protected packages feature.
Fedora users are clearly used to such a feature and expect it while
upstream doesnt want to add hand holding features, but provide a
method to do the same.
On 5 January 2014 18:32, Lars E. Pettersson
Orion, is it possible that you missed h5py? We are getting this
1. Warning! ***HDF5 library version mismatched error***
2. The HDF5 header files used to compile this application do not match
3. the version used by the HDF5 library to which this application is
linked.
4. Data
Am 05.01.2014 20:06, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
Frankly, that's a dumb feature to have the package manager know
magic things about some
Hi all
I'm an IT university student. With Fedora I have a total experience about half
a year, my primary distribution is Archlinux (about four or five years
experience).
Currently, I'm preparing a Fedora package as part of my bachelor thesis:
A library for RdRand (the instruction used in Ivy
On 01/04/2014 03:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 10:50 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
This is the first time I heard of DNF.
Looking at the page where differences between DNF and yum are
explained (http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html) my question
is: do we really need
Welcome in Fedora :)
Out of curiosity, are you only packaging it or also developing it ?
Anyway, it will be a useful library (no trolling about the rdrand
instruction ;))
Best regards,
H.
Le 5 janv. 2014 21:14, Jan Tulak jtu...@redhat.com a écrit :
Hi all
I'm an IT university student. With
I uploaded a new version of the efl srpm that patches configure directly
to look for the correct tslib pkg-config and removes the call to
autogen. Also corrects a cut paste error I made that erroneously
included libemotion in the ephysics package.
Thank you :-)
I'm also developing it (https://github.com/BroukPytlik/RdRand).
ReadMe still needs to be filled with reasonable texts, I have to copy it from
man pages (why write the same things twice). :-)
About the security concerns... I have done some statistical testing of it
(PractRand,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 01:06:16PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
Frankly, that's a dumb feature to have the package manager know
magic
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
i say the same thing to the autopager and cutted output of
systemctl and journalctl and the repsonse there is we are
not Unix, we are Linux
Yeah, I dislike that as well. If I want paged output, I'll page it; if
I want cut output,
Am 05.01.2014 23:33, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
i say the same thing to the autopager and cutted output of
systemctl and journalctl and the repsonse there is we are
not Unix, we are Linux
Yeah, I dislike that as well. If I want paged
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
where would it be useful to uninstall base-package and YUM/DNF itself
bringing your system in a non-recoverable state?
I already offered a couple of examples that you ignored (just a couple
that came to mind, certainly not an
Am 05.01.2014 23:53, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
where would it be useful to uninstall base-package and YUM/DNF itself
bringing your system in a non-recoverable state?
I already offered a couple of examples that you ignored (just a
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 19:24 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/05/2014 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf
Hi,
I am Tom Hodder, long time fedora user, ex-RHCE, and tolland on IRC.
I noticed that ghemical was listed as an orphaned package, and I had an
email chat with the previous maintainer, and he suggested that there are
some updates pending in upstream. However he was too busy to continue as
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
border cases where you can use --nodeps
What does --nodeps have to do with this?
this is *really* a border case where download and rpm -Uvh --force
is the way to go
No, you should do it correctly. First, AFAIK rpm doesn't have the
Am 06.01.2014 02:12, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
border cases where you can use --nodeps
What does --nodeps have to do with this?
border cases are not usual behavior?
this is *really* a border case where download and rpm -Uvh --force
On 01/05/2014 11:54 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Orion, is it possible that you missed h5py? We are getting this
1. Warning! ***HDF5 library version mismatched error***
2. The HDF5 header files used to compile this application do not match
3. the version used by the HDF5 library to
On 2014-01-02 16:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
[Third try to send this email. The Gmail Android app has a lovely UI
to select the sender address, but it doesn't do anything :(.]
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Garrett Holmstrom
gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:32 PM,
This is not the problem. THe problem is: a user of another distribution will
not want to touch Fedora with a ten foot pole pnce he discovers Fedora messe up
with his booter setup. And the parttitionner is equally bad. These are two
areas a distribution not only in the area of bugs but in
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 02:33 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.01.2014 02:12, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
border cases where you can use --nodeps
What does --nodeps have to do with this?
border cases are not usual behavior?
His
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 23:32 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last
thing I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20
forces on me it will be my main installation and forces me to choose
between installing
On 01/05/2014 11:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
where would it be useful to uninstall base-package and YUM/DNF itself
bringing your system in a non-recoverable state?
I already offered a couple of examples that you ignored (just a couple
On 01/06/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 19:24 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of
the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this is a
bug. I will file one.
dnf has no auto
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 22:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 23:32 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last
thing I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20
forces on me it will be my
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:01 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/06/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 19:24 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party of
the auto completed commands. If remove should
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 23:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't see what needs elaborating. I'm not aware that the 11th
commandment is Every Subcommand Must Be Documented, Even Ones You Just
Put In So People Still Using Syntax From The Old Tool You're Replacing
Won't Have A Problem. If
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-01-06
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again soon! Still not an awful lot on the agenda that
I can see, to be honest, I
On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Jean François Martinez jfm...@free.fr wrote:
This is not the problem. THe problem is: a user of another distribution
will not want to touch Fedora with a ten foot pole pnce he discovers Fedora
messe up with his booter setup. And the parttitionner is equally
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 22:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 23:32 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last
thing I would want is a
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 00:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 22:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 23:32 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
427987a3d564958d174f8229905b294b Mojolicious-4.66.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e0f1a688c9075b27c5277be78ee90a6499544aab
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 5 11:17:51 2014 +0100
Update to 4.66
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Random:
9604ddc45eff8fc95803f34a7553c93b Data-Random-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d086921ef084daef9615ecf92c3d965154430306
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 5 11:36:12 2014 +0100
Update to 0.11
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Data-Random.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047282
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
commit 3bd91e3c579c426739f09993dcbc5098dbaea628
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 5 18:02:21 2014 +0100
Update to 1.00
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC.spec | 14 +-
sources |2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914265
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820663
--- Comment #15 from Peter Lawler redhat-bugzi...@bleeter.id.au ---
Oh hey, I had forgotten about this bug until I updated to F20 and GnuCash was
on the 'featured' list of the in-distro Software Installer.
Did Bill and Marcela sort out the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048134
lnie l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Pluggable:
15a539c8d0b5e61d8a475949127fc682 Module-Pluggable-5.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit af2df40337baf1b3ff3d3d1d2a79e738abd0e96c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 6 08:10:58 2014 +0100
5.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Pluggable.spec |8 +---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048455
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
67 matches
Mail list logo
