Dne 16.1.2014 16:38, Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
Would anyone mind sharing their mock configurations for EPEL 7?
I've got this http://ur1.ca/gfot7
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
I created an EL6 branch of qt-creator and submitted the build on koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6401118 ), but it
hasn't shown up the testing repo yet? Is there something I need to do to
get
On 17/01/14 04:38, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Jeff Sheltren
j...@tag1consulting.com mailto:j...@tag1consulting.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an EL6
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 07:11 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've been trying to do this for a new package, cajun-jsonapi
bodhi refuses to let me request the update, it always gives the
message:
cajun-jsonapi-2.0.3-1.el6 not tagged as an update candidate
It is in the Git repository
On 01/14/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 18. A previous reminder was sent on
December 18th [0].
How does this affect Copr?
On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
repositories. Options which comes to
- Original Message -
On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
Dne 15.1.2014 18:12, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches.
Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have
in your local git repo into dist-git,
Dne 15.1.2014 17:51, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a):
I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain.
These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think
On 2014-01-15, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
Thanks Petr. I knew that was the older method, but from what I read
in the guidelines, I didn't think it was known to be broken. The Perl
guidelines say:
In the past, several other methods were given for doing this
filtering.
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
gtk3 port.
Thanks!
ma.
[1]
On 01/14/2014 06:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it possible to split the NSAPI components out into a sub package
and hence remove the dependence on gtk2 for those people that don't
use NSAPI plugins?
You can build your own package at copr. We can add some config flags to
firefox spec to make
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
QT firefox to get
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
personally if a GTK user does
On 01/16/2014 01:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3
Hello,
I am working on a draft common crypto policy for Fedora. The idea is to
be able to set a security level for all TLS/SSL connections in a system
(which will of course allow the user to use any application-specific
overrides).
The draft change is at:
On 01/15/2014 05:31 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Also FYI, /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires (or -provides) is not what's used
during rpmbuild unless specifically overridden to use that legacy
mechanism.
Thanks Panu. Is there a way to get rpmbuild to be more verbose about
the
I saw the announcement a week or so ago but it didn't appear to answer my
questions...
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
wondering, are some packages automatically added or did
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 22:31:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
If anyone overrides font choices in their browser config and wonders why
an increasing number of sites - inc. github, and the wordpress admin
interface - seem to display weird hieroglyphs all over the place,
Am 16.01.2014 14:55, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
Also sort of related is people who use MS 1252 but claim the character set is
iso-8859-1
blame the firefox developers first and the fools (also Mozilla)
who ignores doctypes and follow HTML5
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=890478#c1
On 01/15/2014 11:17 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 01/15/2014 08:28 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/15/2014 02:56 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi all,
[I posted this to the packaging list a few days ago, but haven't gotten
any responses, so I want to open this to a wider audience in the hope of
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
old repos?
If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills their
source
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
wondering, are some packages automatically added or did
On 01/09/2014 04:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/09/2014 01:23 PM, William Cohen wrote:
On 01/09/2014 01:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/09/2014 10:48 AM, William Cohen wrote:
PAPI-5.3.0 came out at the beginning of December 2013
(http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/news/news.html?id=331). I
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr to
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/
I deployed it mostly to get rig of few tracebacks we get regularly.
But there is some enhancements as well:
* https is available. Self signed certificate right now. Final
certificate is on the way.
* no need to
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/15/2014 05:31 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Thanks Panu. Is there a way to get rpmbuild to be more verbose about
the finding requires stage? I tried using -vv with rpmbuild and didn't
notice any additional output.
Just added this:
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
old repos?
If someone else uses GPLed binaries
Would anyone mind sharing their mock configurations for EPEL 7?
/etc/mock/epel-7-i386.cfg
/etc/mock/epel-7-x86_64.cfg
It looks like mock-1.1.35-1.fc19.noarch doesn't ship these files yet.
- Ken
___
epel-devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:03:14PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
I am working on a draft common crypto policy for Fedora. The idea is to
be able to set a security level for all TLS/SSL connections in a system
(which will of course allow
Related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052181 that i filed
some days ago.
feel free to update with info on that on :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Would anyone mind sharing their mock configurations for EPEL 7?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:24:04PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
gesture to at least keep the source RPMs around.
The thing is those copr repos will likely depend on EOLed Fedora
repos. Do we keep *those* around? I guess the answer will be different
for each mirror. Some will keep those
commit 4c7ba402487c10921ba047c6287de0da368bd06c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:41:58 2014 +
Update to 1.007
- New upstream release 1.007
- Added 'android' as a Unix-type OS
- Update stopwords patch
...ords.patch =
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-OSType:
7b0795b82471322ec32d267c333dc895 Perl-OSType-1.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
* Another individual thought that all web authors are stupid for
wanting to use fancy fonts and that I am wasting my time. (He might
be right about that last bit... :-P)
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47675/0001-Ticket-47675-logconv-errors-when-search-has-invalid-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
mkrizek claimed this task.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T52
To: mkrizek
Cc: kparal, qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
contains working NPAPI plugin support,
That is a good new,
about drop gtk 1 , IIRC gtk 1 just exit because someone want maintain
xmms in Fedora .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
* Another individual thought that all web authors are stupid for
wanting to use fancy fonts and that I am
Le Jeu 16 janvier 2014 18:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
* Another individual thought that all web authors are
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:33:48 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
be a
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:52:09 -0500,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
We've been discussing this as an option for rendering symbolic icons in
GTK+ too.
But hopefully you won't be claiming the character set is unicode and
relying on a specific font containing glyphs for bogus
On Jan 16, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
At least in a toolkit you can implement the kind of thing suggested on
the Firefox bug, but still - does this look like awesome pseudo-code to
you?
if $thing is Unicode character;
render_unicode($thing);
OH OOPS
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 18:37 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 16 janvier 2014 18:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I have some trivial cleanups I want
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at
Hello,
Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
I know I have not...
I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
ifcfg-Bridge_connection_1
ifcfg-bridge0_slave_1
The contents seem
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
I know I have not...
I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-01-15)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
gtk3 port.
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
I know I have not...
I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
two file in
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on:
journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
The log is at:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so
I'm
wondering, are some packages automatically added or did someone else
request
them as a dependency to one of their packages? I
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:10:31 -0600
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I would've expected anything that exists in epel6 and doesn't exist
in rhel7 to get an epel7 branch. It seems a bit ludicrous doing it
manually
It's not. There's a bunch of things that are in epel6 that are
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:44:34AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
be a friendly gesture to
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on:
journalctl -b
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
the people who want to do this get together and get a set of agreed upon
generic icon
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
the people who want to do
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
characters as text, otherwise it's just
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, it does seem that they're using the Private Use Areas, which are
specfically reserved for basically this purpose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Use_Areas
Well, kinda. That still only works as long as you can be
On 16/01/14 15:38, Dan Williams wrote:
I bet ya the hang has something to do with these messages:
info (bridge0): IPv4 config waiting until carrier is on
info (bridge0): IPv6 config waiting until carrier is on
info Activation (bridge0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete.
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
the people
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 20:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
i know that will not happen, but on the KDE desktop *any* GTK2 or GTK3
application is much more disturbing as the difference GTK2/GTK3
When
On 01/16/2014 01:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The other thing -- getting unicode to include standard symbols -- is
happening. That's why we have . Yay standards!
Oh man. Change that to 144pt. Is it chocolate soft
On Jan 16, 2014 10:19 AM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052859
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org ---
So, in your git commit, I see:
# Don't package
+%exclude %{perl_vendorlib}/auto/share/dist/Plack/#foo
Unfortunately, because you don't also exclude this file from the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-Zip:
e804985def2c1f0ed640ab4ca6aa85a1 Archive-Zip-1.37.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ccc5fa367bed7e85d2301b0c147e3943256fc0da
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 16 09:28:51 2014 +0100
1.37 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Archive-Zip.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052859
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #7)
It probably doesn't matter much, but should it be excluded in both then?
Yep, this is a mistake.
It had been excluded before and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053090
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054111
Bug ID: 1054111
Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL-4.026 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hi Jochen,
On 15/01/14 20:09, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask you, if you will able to provide perl-MIME-tools for EPEL-7.
I do plan to build it, but there are quite a lot of other packages that
need to be built first. For instance, it uses Convert::BinHex, which
needs
Dear package maintainers,
I rely on Perl module packages you maintain being in EPEL. Now that
EPEL-7 is open for branch requests, I'd like to kindly ask you to either
request an epel7 branch for your packages or let me know that you're not
willing to do that (so that I can request the branches
Hello,
I would like to ask you, if you will able to provide perl-MIME-tools for EPEL-7.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967719
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1054061 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054061
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|967719 |
Referenced Bugs:
commit cf200bc89738b2c611a4579afa0c93a5b2975ce8
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:55:38 2014 +0100
Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test.
perl-Plack.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 5f0af47e1e3dd873c329892ec4ad36c9475061b2
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:55:10 2014 +0100
Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test.
perl-Plack.spec | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 77152cb5acbd3c9296b54e1b284ce4fcc9af8875
Merge: 9a62e75 cf200bc
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:09:36 2014 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
perl-Plack.spec | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4
Summary of changes:
5f0af47... Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test. (*)
cf200bc... Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
5f0af47... Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test. (*)
cf200bc... Move misplaced %exclude-line from base-package to *-Test. (*)
77152cb... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f20' into f19
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052859
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Plack-1.0030-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-1.0030-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052859
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Plack-1.0030-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Plack-1.0030-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
commit 4e70561955c153368b849c4c41f0796cacc11ebe
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:30:47 2014 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-LWP-Protocol-https.spec | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054233
Bug ID: 1054233
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-No-Worries
Assignee: massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Reporter:
commit 7be537aa6d485cf1e64a3e7efb5ea7d8426cc240
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:46:18 2014 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-Mozilla-CA.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054233
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053440
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
This bugfix is suitable for the stable releases, too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SOAP-Lite:
760a8d839232f62d439a0bdc069cc11e SOAP-Lite-1.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a3309870a9bdab76066ad926256355293a63393f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:07:26 2014 +0100
1.09 bugfix bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054061
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053440
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-OSType-1.007-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
4c7ba40... Update to 1.007
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bcb9513f56ced2fcbd25ad493691c333274b91e3
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 17 11:30:01 2014 +1000
add file perms
perl-XML-Catalog.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Catalog.spec
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
