On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:18:30PM +0100, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense to rename the cloud-utils
(sub-)package for EPEL7 and F21.
Upstream (Ubuntu) used to have a
Compose started at Mon Feb 24 08:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
On 02/19/2014 08:57 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
* Open floor (t8m, 19:45:44)
* AGREED: FESCo expects the Tech specs/docs from working groups by
March 3rd at the latest (+7, -0, 0:0) (t8m, 19:50:38)
* ACTION: t8m will update the weekly reports ticket with this request
(t8m, 19:53:08)
Am 24.02.2014 04:59, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
how can people pretend installation went smoothly, no issue detected
during basic document manipulation for packages which are not installable
at all due dependencie problems?
Indeed, people giving +1 after manually installing
Thanks. Fixed.
1.15-2.fc21 didn't fix the file conflict problem.
file /usr/share/man/mann/fifo.n.gz from install of tcllib-1.15-2.fc21.noarch
conflicts with file from package memchan-2.3-4.fc20.i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com writes:
I've got a few comments and questions about the recently filed bugs asking
us to switch from Requires: java to Requires: java-headless. First, the
bugs list some web pages to view for more information. Number two on that
list is this:
From: awill...@redhat.com
Date: 02/21/2014 17:05
Subject: Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21)
meeting minutes and logs
Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 16:38 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
With the best of intentions, we'd
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:16:59PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
2) Report packages which *don't* have any test suites at all.
Could you provide the rationale for 2? Why do you want to do it and
what does Fedora gain by doing it?
Better code quality, less risk of regressions,
From: li...@colorremedies.com
To: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
Date: 02/22/2014 17:38
Subject: Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21)
meeting minutes and logs
Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 03:37:40PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 19:08:15 -0700,
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
The idea of what Anaconda can do to create powerful storage stacks
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 17:08 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Installer is still a hot topic, but thats nothing we could resolve
during our meeting and which might have to be brought up with FESCO again.
So, as cmurf has been trying to point out on desktop@ , we
- Original Message -
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 03:37:40PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 19:08:15 -0700,
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
The idea of what Anaconda can do
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
# additional repository
fedora-{incubator,ugly}
* better name than ugly based on content of repo
* github-like frontend for copr
* discuss policies/procedures for accepting copr repo
#SCL in Fedora
* base on needs for
Hello,
I would like to unretire NDOUtils in Fedora, I'm currently using it at work.
NDOUtils was orphaned in Fedora in 2012 [1], but since the EPEL 5 6
branches cannot be retired, those branches were still there. The previous
owner gave the branch ownership to me, so I'm missing only the Fedora
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
8 packages were orphaned
ghc-IOSpec [devel,f20] was orphaned by petersen
A pure specification of the IO monad
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ghc-IOSpec
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:06:47 +0100
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de wrote:
Hi,
finally, I found some time to update one of my bigger packages (zorba)
to the latest release and to adapt it to build successfully on f21.
However, the package (still) fails to build for armv7hl. The
Am 24.02.2014 16:49, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:06:47 +0100 Martin Gieseking
martin.giesek...@uos.de wrote:
Hi,
finally, I found some time to update one of my bigger packages
(zorba) to the latest release and to adapt it to build
successfully on f21. However, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr: FESCo needs to know what is going to need extra time to deliver
Fedora.next in the Fedora 21 cycle.
Now that the Fedora.next product PRDs have been approved, the next
phase is to plan our execution. First of all, this will mean planning
out
On Feb 24, 2014 1:46 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/19/2014 08:57 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
* Open floor (t8m, 19:45:44)
* AGREED: FESCo expects the Tech specs/docs from working groups by
March 3rd at the latest (+7, -0, 0:0) (t8m, 19:50:38)
* ACTION: t8m
Slightly off-topic: fedora-review is telling packagers NOT to add
Requires: jpackage-utils to javadoc subpackages because that is added
automatically, but I see no mention of this on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java.
Guidelines state that package must have R: jpackage-utils
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
# additional repository
fedora-{incubator,ugly}
* better name than ugly based on content of repo
* github-like frontend for copr
*
On 24 February 2014 10:44, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
As a non-exhaustive list of example things we expect will need
attention and would like input (particularly time-estimates) on:
* Quality Assurance: Coverage increases and automation such as
Task-o-Tron[1]
*
Hi,
sorry that i am replying so late. I checked your suggestions, replaced
/usr/bin with
%{_bindir}. I also gave there 0%{?el5} shortcut
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 2014-02-21 10:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:28:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/21/2014 01:14 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:24AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
+1 I still have an application that is slowly moving to 1.5 but
not there
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser in Fedora EPEL 6 was orphaned by mmaslano
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by mmaslano
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 650b6075293bb84393eff4ac7137864c6dc0d14b
Author: Jan Holcapek holca...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 24 11:42:52 2014 +0100
Fix formatting of Changes
Changes.patch | 1294
perl-DBD-ODBC.spec |8 +-
2 files changed, 1301
Summary of changes:
650b607... Fix formatting of Changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
650b607... Fix formatting of Changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
650b607... Fix formatting of Changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
650b607... Fix formatting of Changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-NumSeq:
c5543cd98a432c779263de4ab7de548a Math-NumSeq-69.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2be0e02c7bb0b5ed03ab5ab2eeb0f5c94074dd09
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Mon Feb 24 12:25:38 2014 +0100
New version 69 (#1066371)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-NumSeq.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
8b7289a... Updated to upstream version 1.47 (*)
650b607... Fix formatting of Changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066371
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
commit 016f1b17450070914b5b9ddd2c45b5628f91d669
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 24 13:22:30 2014 +0100
Document Build's run-time dependencies
perl-Module-Build.spec |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Build.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061604
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067185
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.76
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061604
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060360
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068742
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-DBD-ODBC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBD-ODBC-1.47-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(the)
On i386:
perl-DBD-ODBC-1.47-1.fc21.i686 requires perl(the)
On armhfp:
perl-DBD-ODBC-1.47-1.fc21.armv7hl requires perl(the)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
Hi
I noticed that some shell scripts have bashisms in them, on Debian and
it's derivatives /bin/sh is dash. A quick list of scripts shipped by
389-ds-base having this issue:
monitor
ldif2db
ldif2ldap
db2bak
vlvindex
dn2rdn
restoreconfig
saveconfig
upgradedb
suffix2instance
dbverify
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47699/0002-Ticket-ticket47699-Propagate-plugin-precedence-to-al.patch
taking into account Rich and Mark reviews
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
IPA team filled this ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553.
It requires an ACI improvement so that during a MODDN a given
user is only allowed to move an entry from one specified part of
On 02/24/2014 02:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
IPA team filled this ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553.
It requires an ACI improvement so that during a MODDN a given
user is only allowed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2014 06:10 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
That being said, I'm not sure there is enough benefit to fight the
common usage of the term unit testing. While they are checks by
the definitions I listed above, the cost of re-defining all unit
tests as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr: FESCo needs to know what is going to need extra time to deliver
Fedora.next in the Fedora 21 cycle.
Now that the Fedora.next product PRDs have been approved, the next
phase is to plan our execution. First of all, this will mean planning
out
56 matches
Mail list logo
