On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 14:52 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> yum fs refilter
>
> ...the former alters all the yumdb.ts_install_langs and
> yumdb.tsflag_nodocs flags for the installed packages (without having to
> do an actual reinstall), so that those packages are marked as having
> their docs/langs fi
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 22:58 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 22:55:21 +0200,
> > drago01 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
> >> reason why we have to restrict that t
On 05/16/2014 12:02 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 08:26:23 -0300
Henrique Junior wrote:
MOPAC7 is still in good shape despite the age.
Also, I'm active in the field of computational chemistry myself.
So is MOPAC7 viable for Fedora? it's been dormant since 2006; is there a
bett
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:56 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:42 +0300, Marius A wrote:
> >
> > > Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
> > > On Fedora 21, any way to apply these before installing to S
On Fri, 16 May 2014 18:51:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:28:20 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > Are they permitted, and do they work?
> >
> > Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
> > know what hardware will be installed on the
On 05/16/2014 06:24 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
* Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
now asks for the `Upstream URL`
Why? What is this supposed to be useful for?
AFAIS,
- this pkgdb-URL is redundant to the contents of the RPM
=> This pkgd
On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:28:20 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Are they permitted, and do they work?
>
> Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
> know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
>
> Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
That doesn't w
Dear all,
Here is some information regarding the consequences of deploying pkgdb2:
* The first and most annoying one is that PkgDB2 having a new API, it needs
a new packagedb-cli [1] which is necessary to have `fedpkg retire` working.
There is already a bug opened for it [2] but the solution is s
On Fri, 16 May 2014 08:26:23 -0300
Henrique Junior wrote:
> 2014-05-16 6:23 GMT-03:00 Susi Lehtola :
> > Computational chemistry is by no means dead. There are big packages
> > available for real calculations, e.g. NWChem and PSI4 are available in
> > Fedora.
>
> I have to disagree with you. Comp
Quick summary:
- On topic of merge reviews, no big news so far, still in progress.
jreznik mentioned to potentially use this as a template for Ruby
software collections in the future
- pknirsch mentioned in the open floor section that we might get some
more helping hands to help on rel-eng a
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:15:52PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> wrote:
>> > After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
>> > into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>> "Fedora Package Database -- Version
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:15:52PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> wrote:
> > After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> > into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
> "Fedora Package Database -- Version 1.6"
> Shouldn't this read "2.0" or something?
Yeah, I had t
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
"Fedora Package Database -- Version 1.6"
Shouldn't this read "2.0" or something?
--
devel mailing list
dev
On Fri, 16 May 2014 06:08:29 -0400
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 8:28:33 PM, I wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists
> > today?
>
> > As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
> > them at
> > https://lists.fedorapr
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It seems it is not possible to request commit access in a single
branch? It's all or nothing now?
The UI is not very clear...
Click on "Manage the committers" to request a single branch.
I made the mistake of clicking "Request Commit Access" and this automatically
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:51:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>
> pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
> commit access for
On 16 May 2014 00:53, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Too bad I don't have the time to be a packager anymore...
If anyone does pick this up, ghemical needs an AppData file:
https://github.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/blob/master/ghemical/ghemical-2.99.2-24.fc20.log
Richard
--
devel mailing list
deve
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:09:33PM +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
> On 16/05/14 11:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >Are they permitted, and do they work?
> >
> >Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
> >know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
>
2014-05-16 6:23 GMT-03:00 Susi Lehtola :
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:06:59 -0300
> Henrique Junior wrote:
>
> > Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
> > important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, mpqcare...
> )
> > marked as orphaned in F20, is that
On 16/05/14 11:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
I'm not sure if they work but I think a wi
Dne 15.5.2014 22:49, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two “will need to be modified” referenc
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Re
On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 8:28:33 PM, I wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists today?
> As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
> them at
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ppc/2014-May/date.html
> I tried checking my mail opt
On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:06:59 -0300
Henrique Junior wrote:
> Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
> important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, mpqcare... )
> marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct?
> As a chemist I'm very concerned about that.
I intend to retire rubygem-virt-p2v, which was a tool for
converting physical machines to virtual machines.
It is obsolete, replaced by a newly rewritten virt-p2v tool
which is part of libguestfs and will be available in Rawhide soon.
Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be broken at the moment
On 05/16/2014 09:10 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 07:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this up
On 05/16/2014 07:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes f
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
There's a trac instance on the project page to report bugs
https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
