Re: PkgDB2 is now in production

2014-05-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap. It's not that there are many broken redirect it's that we didn't put in place any redirect atm :) Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PkgDB2 is now in production

2014-05-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 09:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: It seems it is not possible to request commit access in a single branch? It's all or nothing now? The UI is not very clear... Click on Manage the committers to request a single branch. I made the

Re: Intent to retire: rubygem-virt-p2v

2014-05-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be broken at the moment (bug 1098462) so I cannot retire this package at the moment. You can do it via the UI directly. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PkgDB2 is now in production

2014-05-17 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:30:10AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: There is a ticket opened for this [1] that I am thinking to fix by adding a confirmation step on the Request Commit Access button asking something like: Are you sure you want to request commit access on all branches? (if not

Upstream developer has some questions regarding Gsettings and Dconf

2014-05-17 Thread quickbooks office
I filed the below bug and the upstream developer has some questions regarding Gsettings and Dconf. If anyone knows the answers to the below questions please email back. Thanks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094052 --- Comment #3 from François Agrech --- Hello, I'm the main

rawhide report: 20140517 changes

2014-05-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Broken deps for i386 -- [MegaMek] MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires libgcj_bc.so.1 MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat [PyKDE]

Re: Intent to retire: rubygem-virt-p2v

2014-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be broken at the moment (bug 1098462) so I cannot retire this

Re: Intent to retire: rubygem-virt-p2v

2014-05-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens

Re: Intent to retire: rubygem-virt-p2v

2014-05-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 May 2014 18:44:08 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200 Pierre-Yves

tinyxml2 API/ABI change

2014-05-17 Thread François Cami
Hello, I will update tinyxml2 in a week in rawhide. cppcheck, dvblinkremote and libmediainfo will need to be rebuilt afterwards. As far as I can tell no change will be needed to rebuild at least the last two. A scratch build is available at:

Re: Incompatible change in libgc with no soname bump

2014-05-17 Thread Rex Dieter
Jerry James wrote: %{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like so:

Re: Incompatible change in libgc with no soname bump

2014-05-17 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Jerry James wrote: %{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like

[Bug 1094169] perl-Params-Validate make check error

2014-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1094712] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-83 is available

2014-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094712 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-83-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1095104] If truncate(to='week') fails, it will clobber the object

2014-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095104 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.06-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1095104] If truncate(to='week') fails, it will clobber the object

2014-05-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095104 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DateTime-1.06-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving