On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on
jansson-devel.
The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from
Compose started at Tue Jun 3 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: hawkey-0.4.16-1.el7
Library providing simplified C and Python API to libsolv
New package: ldapdiff-1.4.1-4.el7
Tool for incremental LDAP directory updates based on ldif files
New package:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this
causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the
-devel
On 3 June 2014 11:29, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
You can file a bug with RHEL rel-eng here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%207component=relengversion=7.0
Of course, supporting Workstation in general would be very
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
773
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
120
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
104
NO.
Feel free to do that.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Till Maas wrote:
gdome2 sundaram
I have retired this already. What more should I do?
You need to retire it in pkgdb. Btw. the retiring reason could be
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially
as a Fedora Remix. Deleting
Hi,
On 06/02/2014 10:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
claim it's deprecated over lcms2
rhel 7 doesn't depends on it for the few package, so it might be an option
not to build lcms support for certain package
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
claim it's deprecated over lcms2
# repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
entangle-0.5.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
FYI the repo you're pointing
On 02.06.2014 23:07, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
python-pillow-2.2.1-4.fc20.src.rpm
This one can be fixed by upgrading to 2.3.0 (or greater. 2.4.0 is current).
2.4.0 is what's in rawhide. Not sure if that's safe to push back to
No agenda, meeting cancelled.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 05/29/2014 06:31 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with an idea of building lua libraries against compat-lua to
allow luajit working with them. My initial motivation for this is that there
are projects which don't work with
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
# repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
cinepaint-1.4-5.fc20.src.rpm
cmyktool-0.1.6-0.6.pre1.fc20.src.rpm
DevIL-1.7.8-16.fc20.src.rpm
Hey folks! Just a note that I've put up the validation matrices for June
2014 (thanks pwhalen and satellit for the reminders):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Rawhide_2014_06_Install
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Rawhide_2014_06_Base
please enter
-- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'frames' is missing'
reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1
('report_uReport' exited with 1)
--- Running report_EmergencyAnalysis ---
Compressing data
Sending
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'frames' is
missing'
reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1
('report_uReport' exited with 1)
I'm seeing the same, and have
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:19 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Docker Container Image =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Docker_Container_Image
Change owner(s): Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org, Dennis Gilmore
den...@ausil.us
This is Fedora
On 06/01/2014 05:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
R-bigmemory spot, spot
RETIRED
log4net spot, cicku, spot
Fixed and built in rawhide:
log4net-1.2.13-1.fc21
netgospot, spot
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen:
The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default.
So we now allow shipping the configuration for third-party repositories,
even enabled by default? Is April 1st still
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, 2:37:49 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/lcms/bugs/all lists a CVE. If
lcms-11 is no longer going to be maintained in Fedora that (and any
other) security flaws won't be addressed. It's therefore advisable
for them to update to the new version of lcms if feasible. The
affected packager would
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:35:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
What Fedora exactly is the image going to contain? Fedora Server?
Fedora Cloud? Will it be a part of either of those products? If not,
what is its status, exactly? Who's responsible for it? Is it considered
a primary or frontline
On 03.06.2014 23:20, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/lcms/bugs/all lists a CVE. If
lcms-11 is no longer going to be maintained in Fedora that (and any
other) security flaws won't be addressed. It's therefore advisable
for them to update to the new version of
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-06-03/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103668
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104075
Bug ID: 1104075
Summary: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-13.fc21 FTBFS: Failed test
'autogenerating and autoreading IV should also
round-trip'
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104134
Bug ID: 1104134
Summary: perl-Test-Unit-0.25-17.fc21 FTBFS: t/assert.t test
fails randomly
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Unit
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104137
Bug ID: 1104137
Summary: perl-YAML-0.92-1.fc21 FTBFS: t/release-pod-syntax.t
fails if perl_bootstrap is enabled
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-YAML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104137
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104137
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104137
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103670
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813532
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47763
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47763/0001-Ticket-47763-winsync-plugin-modify-is-broken.patch
Thanks to Carsten Grzemba for the patch. Made minimum changes such as
replacing the direct access to the bv_len in Slapi_Value with
Outside any header requirements or directive documentation requirements,
are there any changes to PEP8 that folks want to make? If so, please
list the exceptions and why you think they should be adopted.
E251 =
libtaskotron/directives/bodhi_comment_directive.py:247:67: E251
But if there's a strong desire for more columns, I'll manage. Can't hinder
the team, can I? :)
Also, we should mention that by default the maximal line length is set to 79,
not 80.
Let's just set it to 80 (as we already use it in the code), and forget about
the heretic 100 idea :)
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Outside any header requirements or directive documentation
requirements, are there any changes to PEP8 that folks want to
make? If so, please list the exceptions and why you think they
should be adopted.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2014 02:01 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
Of the concerns you raised, I'm not terribly opposed to most of
them other than E128 and E122. I'm not crazy about dropping E265,
though.
One thing to watch with pep8 is it has the notion of ignored by
39 matches
Mail list logo
